Usuyal problem with the cant and 'phacts' of the whole welfare reform opposition is that they seem to be based not even in anecdotal evidence byut in man down the pub level stories ...
Unlike your full-frontal assault on grammar in general? .
And those are merely the ones which even the DWP investigation couldn't deny - that doesn't include cases of indirectly yet significantly hastening the death, or exacerbating an illness which was already severely limiting longevity or quality of life.One in five claimant's deaths linked to benefit sanctions, says secret dwp investigation into 49 deaths.
http://www.disabilitynewsservice.co...related-deaths-involved-sanctions-admits-dwp/
... the problem is a genuine right party would be too radical in the UK ( or much of europe) as the british are relucantant to let people fall by the wayside int othe gutters and trailer parks as seen in the US
Lletsa got banned for similar stuff to this. And unlike this sad wanker he was a decent poster most of the time.where are the coroner's verdicts and comments saying that rather than pity based wailings of left and the guilt ridden pleadings of family who couldnl;t be bothered while the person was alive ?
One in five claimant's deaths linked to benefit sanctions, says secret dwp investigation into 49 deaths.
http://www.disabilitynewsservice.co...related-deaths-involved-sanctions-admits-dwp/
Lletsa got banned for similar stuff to this. And unlike this sad wanker he was a decent poster most of the time.
Yes.Is that zippyRN cunt still here?
He should get a permaban imo. A fucking nasty piece of work.Yes.
Not even interesting or entertaining.<snip> A fucking nasty piece of work.
zippyRN Why have you come here to shit all over this thread?
One in five claimant's deaths linked to benefit sanctions, says secret dwp investigation into 49 deaths.
http://www.disabilitynewsservice.co...related-deaths-involved-sanctions-admits-dwp/
I suspect that if he responds, it'll be along the lines of it having been compiled by leftie Civil Servants, thus proving he's never worked in a central government department, or met a Civil Servant.
It's really not that good....I was looking forward to using my mighty banhammer, as though I were a Norse thundergod sent to smite the unworthy.
'OOOOO-DIIIIIIN!'
Fuck, yeah...
how aobut the following , far more correct in terms of the rules of scientific evidence comments
1. potential / actual bias of source - i.e. the editorial spin of the
2. correlation / causation issues - or does previous sanctions indicate issues with playing by the rules ? can;t tell that without access to the source materials
i also note how they hide the comments from Anne Begg pointing out the correlatiuon / causation issues ...
it;s also interesting how secrtetive some people are, yet i nthe next breath demanding that others ' personal information is published far and wide .
Thank youThread ban = happy to oblige. Hang on while I find the button.
Thread ban = happy to oblige. Hang on while I find the button...
Thread ban = happy to oblige. Hang on while I find the button
.
First time for everything (shame his previous posts on there were remarkably similar to those on here. He's been pulling this shit for years).He's pitched up on the atos support thread now, with none of this nastiness so far.
I know, and he should be ashamed of himself.First time for everything (shame his previous posts on there were remarkably similar to those on here. He's been pulling this shit for years).
thread ban thank you ma'mThread ban = happy to oblige. Hang on while I find the button
It's really not that good.
Lletsa got banned for similar stuff to this. And unlike this sad wanker he was a decent poster most of the time.