are they really comparable? I mean the #occupylsx thing is obviously modelled on the #15m stuff in Spain, the idea being to mobilise people against the financial and political classes in general. Now the latter hasn't managed to change anything particularly profound about the Spanish state, but it has developed a very broad base of activists available to help out with a wide variety of more practical things - preventing evictions, supporting a teacher's strike and had the helpful side effect of creating a public space for people critical of the system per se.
With the best will in the world, you're not going to get that out of strike support.
I agree with a lot of what pickman's model says but I want to stress that I think the term "political class(es)" and "financial class" are fairly meaningless. It confuses what 'class' is to mix it or apply it to a group of people on a whim. Does it make sense to talk about a "military class" or "manufacturing class"?
It also leads to two dangerous ideas:
1. If we had MPs only serve one term (i.e. not be a class) things would be better.
If MPs had to perform a non-politics role for X years before they were allowed to MPs things would be better.
2. 'Bankers are the problem' / 'Finance is the problem'.
Back in the 1930s the problem was seen as being an international finance problem, and Britain needed to look to tariff protection within the Empire to sort it out.
In the last recession of the 1980s the idea was that old, heavy 'non-value adding' industry (coal) was the problem. What Britain needed to do was restructure and reform, become like Switzerland or Germany, let money go to new high-tech industries and retail.
Once again this crisis is being blamed on 'finance'
We shouldn't single out a struggle against finance and leave the rest of the capitalist system unexamined or 'leave that for that'. It has to be done at the same time, otherwise the non-finance side the manufacturing, retail, agricultural, services wing of the ruling class can organise itself into action knock out the excesses of finance capital, steal the goodies for itself but impose the costs onto the w/class all in the name of fighting the 'financial class'.
We need to start consolidating our ranks, actually listening to and trying winning back the disaffected young people, expelling the renegades, trying to extend the idea of nationalisation and socialisation in single-hander and small business industries/sectors, trying to isolate those who want to extend jail for 'benefit fraudsters' from our ranks, refusing to talk with Labour councillors unless they talk sense,
applying pressure on those on our side not to start letting houses, take voluntary redunancy, use 'saving for children's university fees' as an excuse, investing in shares, , stopping the boom in small businesses is rent insurance companies, try to get thinking in terms of mass participations (millions ideally) [mass boycotts of university examinations, non-payment of utility bills with specific demands for prices, non-fare taking of public transport, strike sympathy actions]
It's those types of things in Greece that have really allowed people to claw back some things there.
Without some support from the rest of Europe - i.e. us - Greek people will lose.
We need to start thinking as the producers' class - that's not 'the 99%' vs 'the bankers'. Our enemies are much wider than the '1%' for a start the 10% (at leasT0 below them make up the ruling class.
Also, if strikes are going to win, then blockades, protests and sit-downs will have to be a part of them.