Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Noam Chomsky: 9-11: Institutional Analysis vs. Conspiracy Theory

Jazzz said:
He is not, and there's nothing anti-semitic in those quotes either.
Either way, he's a fucking nutta.

"Son of God" and a "channel for the Christ spirit," my fucking arse.

Do you believe in his "reptilian humanoid bloodline," Jazzz?
 
editor said:
Either way, he's a fucking nutta.

"Son of God" and a "channel for the Christ spirit," my fucking arse.

Do you believe in his "reptilian humanoid bloodline," Jazzz?
I think David Icke is quoted in 2003 as saying 'we are *all* sons and daughters of God', which is something akin to the message of the Essene version of Jesus, who is called Yeshua.

and potentially, yes, we are all channels for the Christ spirit, which is Love.

it's not that I *know* what you are going to post up Ed, but the fact that you would dub me or my views 'conspiraloon' indicates to me that you have little respect for me or my views. there is only so far a discussion can go, on these terms. I have respect for myself, and for you.

I don't think that swearing helps yr argument, by the way. it's not big and it's not clever!:p
 
Badger Kitten said:
Hmmm, controversial....


In that case, I chellenge with Bologna, citing the Gladio Clause, section 18 (b).

What clause do the Dublin and Monaghan bombings fall under?
 
snouty warthog said:
and potentially, yes, we are all channels for the Christ spirit, which is Love.
Only if you believe in that mumbo-jumbo claptrap, of course.
snouty warthog said:
I think David Icke is quoted in 2003 as saying 'we are *all* sons and daughters of God', which is something akin to the message of the Essene version of Jesus, who is called Yeshua.
You seem to be a bit forgetful.

In 1991 he appeared on the Wogan Show and quite emphatically declared himself to be the Son of God.
 
Problem is, ed, this is going to go nowhere except the same way as the now-terminated arguments with Azrael23 and squeegee.

They're not rationalists (by their own admission): therefore they just won't accept what we would regard as the most logical explanation, and they'll entertain possibilities that we would regard as absurd. And then when we say, 'oh nonsense' they'll start harping on about how our lumpen rationalism just oppresses their freedom of, like, thought and stuff maaaan.

May as well write this one off now IMO.
 
snouty warthog said:
nah- the thing about operation northwoods is that it's *on record* that the government were planning to blow up one of their own ships and blame it on the Cubans. it's documented fact...

"oh, but it never happened..."

no, and why? because JFK opposed it, and was also planning to disband the CIA... and then conveniently within a year he was dead. nothing to do with those nice CIA people of course... in fact, given the level of denial on this board, I'm surprised that people don't think he paid for his own hit-man...

So Operation Northwoods led directly to the Kennedy assassination? That's just making up history by joining the dots between conspiracy theories - I suppose the Kennedy assassination must have led directly to faked moon landings...
 
Jazzz said:
But when you know they are true, they don't seem at all remarkable.


Yes! You must believe, and accept the belief in the Illluminati into your heart! *Then* it will all make sense! Hallelujah!
 
snouty warthog said:
pk, you miss Jazzz's purpose in quoting Goebbels. he is making a point about propaganda, and those who would use it to control the thinking of the masses.

also, I don't think Icke is anti-semitic. that's a smear. what he is, is anti-extra-terrestrial lizard. there is a slight difference. in fact, I don't think he even dislikes all the lizards, just the 'bad' ones. which is understandable. I'm not so keen on the 'bad' lizards either. they are very naughty.

peace:)

Even if we take the charitable interpretation, that Icke genuinely believes he is not an anti-semite, he is still an ideological Typhoid Mary.

By granting the Protocols the oxygen of publicity, he gives fresh life to a libel that should have died decades ago.
 
Badger Kitten said:
One of my favourite conspiracies is that that David Shaykler and David Icke are government-funded to discredit conspiracies, by, erm, being loons.

Thats just a rumour put about to make Shayler-sceptics look like loons! :x
 
I had an enthusiastic email from David Icke's missus once. Nice lady, bit excitable.(It was when me and various other bloggers were pushing the lone masss protest demo. I had a link on David Icke's newsletter, for one day all my hits were from Icke fans. They must have been a bit gutted when they read all the anti CT stuff on me blog.)
 
From what I've read about Northwood, it wasn't a fully drawn up plan. It was a list of possible methods for increasing support for invasion of Cuba. It included lots of different things. To make out it was a detailed plan for "false flag" ops is misleading as far as I can tell.
 
It's mad. It's like saying because there were plans to nuclear-bomb Russia during the 70's , there must have been many secret nuclear-bomb strikes that we don't know about.
 
snouty warthog said:
pk, you miss Jazzz's purpose in quoting Goebbels. he is making a point about propaganda, and those who would use it to control the thinking of the masses.

Yes, but he wasn't using it in the same context.
 
david_icke_turquoise.jpg


"It was the Jews what done it, honest!"
 
No it's not 'the Jews'. :rolleyes: Icke refers to a ruling elite comprised of a few families, some of which happen to be Jewish. He gives whole day-long lectures without mentioning the word 'Jew' - rather curious for an anti-semite. It may appear by isolating stuff about Jewishness from many millions of words he has written that there's some hidden issue but it really isn't. As for the Talmud, I think it's a racist load of nonsense too (among other religious institutions which he will also criticise).
 
Jazzz said:
No it's not 'the Jews'. :rolleyes: Icke refers to a ruling elite comprised of a few families, some of which happen to be Jewish. He gives whole day-long lectures without mentioning the word 'Jew' - rather curious for an anti-semite. It may appear by isolating stuff about Jewishness from many millions of words he has written that there's some hidden issue but it really isn't. As for the Talmud, I think it's a racist load of nonsense too (among other religious institutions which he will also criticise).
From Blagsta's link"
Icke has strongly denied that he is an anti-Semite, stressing that the Rothschilds are reptiles, not Jews
So that settles that one, then.
 
Idris2002 said:
What clause do the Dublin and Monaghan bombings fall under?

That'll be the Top Sikrit Chequers Convention of 1974.

Invoking the "Some like it hot" rules, I call Marilyn, in the kitchen, with the pills.
 
..... aaaaaaaannnnnnddddd......

... we're into 20 pages. And none the fucking wiser. Still, it's something to do innit.

I'm quite tempted to write a program to generate these threads. Wouldn't be too hard. Kindof like a bunch of turing-test machines sitting in a circle, talking fairly intelligent sounding bollocks to each other until the end of time.
 
Back
Top Bottom