savoloysam
Pigman's pigman's ha ha charade you are..
The SNP lost when Nicola resigned. She clearly has a great sense of timing hasn't she? Perhaps her next role will be the conductor of an orchestra?
Senior members of the SNP are braced for Nicola Sturgeon’s imminent arrest in the wake of detectives interviewing her husband and the party treasurer amid an investigation into party finances.
Senior MPs and MSPs claim it is “inevitable” that the former first minister will be interviewed under caution or as a witness in the coming weeks.
Sturgeon is the only senior SNP official named on the party’s most recent financial accounts who has not been arrested. The former first minister appears on accounts for the 2021-22 financial year as one of three registered officers, alongside Peter Murrell, the former chief executive, and Colin Beattie, the treasurer. It is understood she has not been spoken to by police but has previously said she would “fully co-operate” if required.
Whether or not she's actually arrested soon,, if/when she is interviewed, it will surely be under caution, as cupid_stunt suggests?I mean yeah, I expect she will be questioned but arresting her, on what they probably currently have? If the other two have been released without charge so far because more information is needed then I'm not sure if there's anything to be gained at this stage.
I'm not saying never address her, just is now the best time to do so?
The covid act suspended the existing oversight safe guards that exist when it comes to the spending of tax payers money...Hence what happened was 'lawful' the easy access fraudulent loans taxpayers took out maybe not so much.Um, I might be missing something essential but I am honestly baffled by this. I mean, £600,000 is not negligible but compared to Mone and Barrowman, the millions squandered during the pandemic, just about anything the foul Johnson had a hand in, Jenrick, Shapps (well, any of them), Robbing the donation funds and buying a swanky RV is dodge as fuck but the Tory scum have had their noses in the trough since forever...and seemingly consequence free.
Stepping back from the audit committee too...so SNP now has no auditors and no treasurer.Unsurprisingly:
Colin Beattie resigns as SNP treasurer after arrest Colin Beattie resigns as SNP treasurer after arrest
I took that to be the Scottish Parliament’s public audit committee.Stepping back from the audit committee too...so SNP now has no auditors and no treasurer.
Yes, but the SNP still have no auditors and now no treasurer. I understood the public audit committee to be something else, or have I misunderstood?I took that to be the Scottish Parliament’s public audit committee.
This is indeed the case.Yes, but the SNP still have no auditors and now no treasurer
No, you’re right. I think I just read a full stop as a colon or something. That’s on me.I understood the public audit committee to be something else, or have I misunderstood?
I may easily have misunderstood.
Jim’s a well-known activist and Labour Party member. He has no reason to be defending the SNP. He does write on police matters, especially regarding GRT rights. I’d call him a credible source.Do you find that line of argument persuasive?
There’s for sure a lot of questions to answer for the SNP. There’s been rumblings about the unease over their finances for years now.It all seems very odd. The resignation of the auditors and the long silence about that certainly raise questions but may be largely the consequence of ongoing police investigation of complaints which were politically motivated in the first place.
No suggestions of anyone being on the take. The allegation is that donations raised specifically for a referendum campaign were used on general party costs.I haven't been following this story that closely tbf - is this basically about donations to the SNP which should have been used in campaigning but were instead used for day to day costs ? Or has someone been on the take ?
Thanks, pretty much what I thought - and tbf - that doesn't sound that bad - and the cost of the whole Police investigation seems grossly inappropriate over this sort of thing .No suggestions of anyone being on the take. The allegation is that donations raised specifically for a referendum campaign were used on general party costs.
Thanks, pretty much what I thought - and tbf - that doesn't that bad - and the cost of the whole Police investigation seems grossly inappropriate over this sort of thing .
Yep, that's corruption and only to be expected, indeed encouraged.That's not fraud at all.
It is suspected fraud - but at the end of the day, the SNP used it for party rather than campaigning purposes - they didn't buy sports cars , champagne and cocaine .Well it is considered fraud and that's why the police are taking it seriously
Or BBC chiefs arranging personal loans for you.You're right but unlike, say, tory ministers giving lucrative contracts to their donors who have no prior experience and with no competitive tender. That's not fraud at all.
I agree - it now looks like Sturgeon resigned because she knew this was coming - so she had the leaving do she wouldn't have got had she resigned a few weeks later - but this does seem to be a massive deal for some accounting shenanigans - when the Tories misuse of public funds (not donations) is clearly a massive scandal that has been swept pretty much under the carpet.Or BBC chiefs arranging personal loans for you.
I have no sympathy for the SNP. They’re in a mess and regardless of the outcome of this investigation their melt down is a disaster area. But, that’s right, the contrasts in the way this is being pursued is interesting.
It is suspected fraud - but at the end of the day, the SNP used it for party rather than campaigning purposes - they didn't buy sports cars , champagne and cocaine .
As I said may have been if they hadn't considered covid times special circumstances and changed law accordingly...Nothing stopping next government conducting an audit and barring the iffyer ones from receiving future government contracts but that's about as much as can be done on thatYou're right but unlike, say, tory ministers giving lucrative contracts to their donors who have no prior experience and with no competitive tender. That's not fraud at all.
If they sell the teabags, maybe.Well ideally they'd go back to all of the donor's and ask them explicitly if they'd approve of the donations being transferred and if not, return the donations. Hard to do with lots of people but if it was via a crowdfunding website it should all be available.
But that's the run isn't it, do they have the money
If they sell the teabags, maybe.