Thank you!Great posts kabbes
Thank you!Great posts kabbes
Just looked at their summary of ESFJ-A, a "Consul" apparently. It definitely isn't me.Apparently at the moment I am a ESFJ-A which is odd because I am pretty sure I have never been one of those when I took the tests before.
I totally agree with you about Myers Briggs. Whichever angle you come at it from, it has serious conceptual problems.
The problem with the idea of things like OCEAN, though (and even more with MBTI) is that it places ideas like "preference" and "attitudes" entirely within the individual rather than in the situation, the relationships within the system containing that situation and the nature of the cultural tools that individual has absorbed in order to interpret a given situation. Even to say that somebody is "open minded about food" makes a whole host of assumptions about common-sense and cultural notions of what food is, the context food is eaten in, who food is eaten with, how it is cooked and so on. "Open-minded" is almost certainly bounded within those notions, so it isn't really about the individual being "open-minded" as a static property of that individual, it's about what the range of cultural contexts are that contain the pre-requisite level of contextual affinity for that individual.
I said it was complete bollocks (or words to that effect) in front of a training bod at work. Don't think it went down too well.Absolutely this. They have no merit or basis in any kind of proven science. An utter waste of time.
I’m alright with that, actually. I’ll buy the idea that within a given context, people will have had different past experiences that could (if you had perfect information) provide a level of predictability as to how they would then individually react to a novel situation. I think that the label of “personality” is unhelpful for this predictability, not least because it implies common-sense characteristics for the way it works that I don’t see any reason to think are true (such as innateness or essentialism or being static or context-free). However, there is not nothing.I don't see OCEAN as placing preferences and attitudes entirely within the individual, and if it does it's a quick fix to change it. You can view it as how the individual tends to act in a world in its various contexts. In answering a question about how open minded about food you are, you could compare yourself with others of similar background in similar cooking contexts and make some reasonable sense of the question.
You, me and Mation have the same four letters, what other four letters do we have in common?INFP. I think it's most likely bollocks but it feels very true for me
DickYou, me and Mation have the same four letters, what other four letters do we have in common?
? Was just thinking that there may be something in it after all, but that it also may be a stick to beat us with too.Dick
Am relieved to see that my previous post on this thread reflected my feeling that this is a horoscope, in which we see lots of generic things and thence recognise them.You, me and Mation have the same four letters, what other four letters do we have in common?
Four letters innitWrong thread/post?
I agree mostly with this TBF...but I will say that I've correctly predicted friends having the same outcome to this as I have. Infp's I get on v well with.Am relieved to see that my previous post on this thread reflected my feeling that this is a horoscope, in which we see lots of generic things and thence recognise them.
However. Yeah
Stop embarrassing me by leaving off the very potentially correct related-to-sex optionsYeah sorry...was just joking...should have written D I C K
Ok ok we all like dicksStop embarrassing me by leaving off the very potentially correct not-related-to-sex options
'scuse my erroneous 'not'.Ok ok we all like dicks
Me too (((cwtch)))'scuse my erroneous 'not'.
I think. Confused now.
I only like one!Ok ok we all like dicks
It's the only one you've tried though I'm guessingI only like one!
You, me and Mation have the same four letters, what other four letters do we have in common?