Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Moronic England fan given 10 years for pushing Polish builder onto tube tracks

editor

hiraethified
_93845457_hi037544650.jpg


Fuck me this guy's a dickhead. The guy he attacked was only saved from being frazzled because he was wearing rubber soles.

_93845139_tube2.jpg


An England football fan has been jailed for 10 years for pushing a man on to live Tube tracks shortly before a train arrived.
Christopher Cole told the Old Bailey he pushed Polish builder David Pietraskzek at Bond Street Station because he was angry at Russian fans' behaviour during Euro 2016.
The victim managed to leap out of the way seconds before the oncoming train.
Cole, 32, admitted attempting to cause grievous bodily harm with intent.
The court heard Cole had got drunk and picked an argument with Mr Pietraskzek, 21, on a Central Line train after mistaking him as Russian on June 9, last year.

England fan jailed for pushing man in front of Tube - BBC News
 
My experience (also non-lawyer) is that the CPS will often bring the charge that it's easiest for them to make stick. They can't prove that he meant to kill, so they won't bring that charge.

I had a car stolen by a drunk, uninsured, unlicensed 15 year old, who told OB that I had said he could borrow my car. They prosecuted him for drunk driving and driving without insurance etc, but not for stealing the car, because they couldn't PROVE that I hadn't lent him the car. Useless fucking wankers.
 
My experience (also non-lawyer) is that the CPS will often bring the charge that it's easiest for them to make stick. They can't prove that he meant to kill, so they won't bring that charge.
That's right. He could have walked free from court on an attempted murder charge. I don't think the sentence for a/m is much heavier than the ten years he got anyway.
 
Maybe someone can explain how someone competent enough to stand trial, can somehow fail to understand that pushing someone in front of a train has a good chance of killing them. Or is "I just deliberately pushed him into a situation highly likely to be fatal, it's not like I was actually trying to kill him" a good enough defence against a charge of attempted murder?
 
Part of the process- he would have taken a GBH with I rather than an AM one and the CPS would go for that to speed things up. what a wanker
 
My thoughts exactly. Getting hit by a train is usually pretty fatal.

Maybe someone can explain how someone competent enough to stand trial, can somehow fail to understand that pushing someone in front of a train has a good chance of killing them. Or is "I just deliberately pushed him into a situation highly likely to be fatal, it's not like I was actually trying to kill him" a good enough defence against a charge of attempted murder?

I'm guessing of course but maybe that charge was easy to prove and I seem to recall you can get a longer sentence for GBH than attempted murder in many cases.

I think I learned that on here actually. Though it was a discussion about causing death by dangerous drivingg IIRC .
 
That's right. He could have walked free from court on an attempted murder charge. I don't think the sentence for a/m is much heavier than the ten years he got anyway.
I understood A.M. was Life sentence stuff. Tbf S18 may be too. All the same, as an occasional tube passenger I,d like people who shove people off platforms to get some serious bird.
 
In civil cases you can use the phrase "further and in the alternative" can you not say that for criminal cases: "attemptive gbh and further and the alternative attempted murder"?
 
hope there's some BIG Polish cellmate waiting for him. With soap ready to be dropped. And no lube.
 
Back
Top Bottom