Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Missing Milly Dowler's voicemail "hacked by News of the World"

the advertisers aren't being bullied, they are being made aware that people are pissed off and that they should share this huge feeling of disgust

Precisely. Nobody is 'bullying' the advertisers (and the idea that people are bullying Tesco is laughable anyway) - just showing them how disgusted people are with the NotW, and dropping a broad hint that it will do them no good to continue their association with it.
 
Fuck your "regard" you and your type are stuck in the 1970's anyway.

Great that campaigns like this have fuck all to do with Marxist groups and other such cunts.

Yes because the left (including many marxists) have not been invovled in any far reaching critiques and ongoing campaings agasint murdoch and concentration of media ownership have they?

And of course they completly ignored the wapping dispute.
 
How newspapers work:

Cover price, roughly speaking, covers the print and distribution cost only. The editorial budget and promotion and profits are paid for by advertising - the great majority of turnover.

Ad pages are priced according to audited circulation. Drive down the circulation through a boycott, and the advertisers get to pay less per page. So that's merely an indirect way of hitting ad revenue.

That was / is my understanding too ^

2,606,397 average circulation per week - 04 Apr 11 - 01 May 11 so £2,606,397 is the average weekly revenue from sales to readers. So that is an annual revenue (from sales) of approx £135m for the NOTW at current readership.

From the BBC it is less clear:

Like most newspapers, it is heavily dependent on advertising revenue, which provided it with some £40m in the past 12 months - although the paper makes more than three times that from its sales to readers

However their top 10 advertisers spent pretty much £40m over 12 months. That £40 is only their top 10, what about the hundreds of others?

_53899163_news_of_world_advtg304.gif
 
So yes I am loving this, watching this dreadful corporation reap the consequences of what it has sown. This is richly deserved and I am enjoying every second of it. They deserve it.

The past few days have had something of the flavour of the last days of Richard Nixon, and I certainly loved every second of that.
 
Thought she'd been appointed to lead the NoTW internal enquiry? Which, is monumentally aroogant obviously. I'll beleive she's toast when we can smell the burning. A few largely anonamous back room peple or hacks are more likely to sacrifised. Although Today program speculation yesterday, mentioned divisions between a Coulson and Brooks camp. I wonder what the back draught of an internal division might throw out at Cameron.

She cant survive. News International will have to sacrifce her to try and being some closure and protect NIs reputation (good luck with that BTW rupe). And Cameron is under intense pressure from his own side to call for her head. Coulson is already fucked and likely to go to prison.
 
Yes because the left (including many marxists) have not been invovled in any far reaching critiques and ongoing campaings agasint murdoch and concentration of media ownership have they?

And of course they completly ignored the wapping dispute.

Campaigns like THIS have not been anything to do with previous failed attempts to destroy these papers.

The world has moved on. Even Mumsnet has more influence than what's left of the anarchists.
 
Hatred of Murdoch and his organsiation is rooted in hatred of what it has done to its many many victims over the past 30+ years. Direcetly - as in the case of the Hillsborough dead and the families of murdred kids - and indirecitly in its role as cheerleader in chief for all the nastiest poliies and hate campaigns since the 80s - campaings and policies that have created uncountable victims from the smashed communities of Thatchers wrecking ball, to refugees, immigrants and gay people beaten up, to the demonsiation of the poor and disabled to the 100s of thousands of corpses in Iraq.

but this isn't anything like that - this is grubby little hacks doing grubby little hack things, unpleasant but comparatively trivial in the wider scheme of things
 
Labour are covered in shit over this as well, their only saving grace is the shit hit the fan after they lost the election - Alan Johnson was in the Guardian today basically saying they avoided taking action a few years ago - and the press spokesman (can't remember his name) was advising them until a few days ago, not to criticise Murdoch.

Basically every PM since Thatcher has tried to cosy up to Murdoch.
 
I'd say down, maybe by half?

I would guess half too
Dropping their approx paper sales revenue from £2.6m to £1.3m.
Advertising will drop by a lot more that half I reckon
The staff, office, print, distribution and other overheads will be pretty static
 
Cameron's got to walk a tightrope, hopefully the it'll all blow up in his face.


Yep. And there's plenty of opportunity for him to say something self damning while this is going on, even if no effect is seen just yet.

@Marty21 I thought Brooks was friends with the Cameronss. Re that intervention he made on her behalf before.
 
You've got to be joking...

As a one off, maybe. That being said I don't know how much of their distribution is to subscribers and paper boys etc, I don't think may will be cancelling subscriptions.

I think a lot of of their readership will want to make their thoughts clear, if only for one week.
 
Campaigns like THIS have not been anything to do with previous failed attempts to destroy these papers.

The world has moved on. Even Mumsnet has more influence than what's left of the anarchists.

Yes you are right. The relish and speed with which people have put the boot into Murdoch has come from nowhere and has no basis in decades of anipathy coming mainly from the politcal left. In fact its year zero and its all happening in a vacumn.
 
Cameron's got to walk a tightrope, hopefully the it'll all blow up in his face.

tightropes are of course not famous for their explosive quality. i think you meant to say he faces the possibility of being blown off (ooer missus) by a great gust of hot air. which would have made more sense.
 
Yep. And there's plenty of opportunity for him to say something self damning while this is going on, even if no effect is seen just yet.

@Marty21 I thought Brooks was friends with the Cameronss. Re that intervention he made on her behalf before.

they all live close by, I think she lives in Chipping Norton (I drove through that the other day - very posh) next door to Cameron's constituency in Witney, I think someone already mentioned that Murdoch jr was best man at her wedding - they probably have hilarious dinner parties
 
Yes you are right. The relish and speed with which people have put the boot into Murdoch has come from nowhere and has no basis in decades of anipathy coming mainly from the politcal left. In fact its year zero and its all happening in a vacumn.

What is is not is a campaign that Socialist Circlejerker can claim any credit for, not this time.

Though they'll try.
 
Just seen someone from the telegraph really laying into cameron on bbc news 24 - 'his reputation is irritreavably damaged (by this scandal) and he needs to somehow pull himself out of the sewer' - interesting - are the rightwing knives out for disco dave?

The Tory right has been sharpening their knives for him since he became leader. They knew they needed him to get a sniff of power, but if they can use this as a reason for an internal coup, to get one of their own in the driving seat, they will.
 
tightropes are of course not famous for their explosive quality. i think you meant to say he faces the possibility of being blown off (ooer missus) by a great gust of hot air. which would have made more sense.

Nope I deliberatly mixed my metaphors, I'm in a kind of early weekend mood and I'd thought I'd throw caution to the wind and see where it takes me.
 
The Tory right has been sharpening their knives for him since he became leader. They knew they needed him to get a sniff of power, but if they can use this as a reason for an internal coup, to get one of their own in the driving seat, they will.

trouble is - the cupboard's bare of potential leaders - who do they have?

Jeremy Hunt? He was doing ok until this bit him on the arse
The Boy Chancellor? - lol
Michael Gove?
Kenneth Clarke - oh yes, the Right hate him too
 
Back
Top Bottom