Well, if Coulson stands up in court and says that Cameron has told the world a pack of lies about him and his relations/work practices etc then he is in serious trouble - potentially killer trouble.
He'll never sue, they filled his mouth with gold.
©No, more brown than 'golden'......
Blunkett? While he was a minister? Isn't that a different charge (like treason?)
Eh? You think people are going to forget about this? A series of trials that no one notices?well done on the CPS getting this in before the olympics .........
several weeks coming of where "its good day .... to bury bad news"
"I am distressed and angry that the CPS have reached this decision when they knew all the facts and were in a position to stop the case at this stage. The charge concerning Milly Dowler is particularly upsetting not only as it is untrue but also because I have spent my journalistic career campaigning for victims of crime. I will vigorously defend these allegations."
Exactly! And why didnt Blunkett say anything? Instead he just took a highly paid job with the company that had just allegedly hacked his phone. Surely a home office minister wouldnt turn a blind eye to illegal practices or allow himself to be brought off? Inconcievable.
I have a inkling that Coulson in particular may yet fall on his sword and plead guilty thereby protecting the government and Cameron in particular, I'm sure they would make it worth his while.
That wouldn't really protect them though.
"Hey Andy, thinking about giving you a job. You never did anything naughty, did you?"
"No, honest!"
"Good show - you're hired!"
...
"Hey Dave, all that bad stuff they're saying about me isn't true, but I'm resigning anyway."
"Sorry to hear that, all the best!"
...
"Hey Dave, all that bad stuff they're saying about me is true after all, and before, when I said it wasn't, I was lying. Sucker!"
"Jumping Jehosaphat!"
'George, I know it's not your birthday, but I saw this Sacrifical Lamb costume and thought of you'.Exactly, who is the real victim here. Poor Dave.
"I am most surprised and disappointed in the outcome. I have always operated under the strict guidance and advice of News International's lawyers and under the instructions of the newspaper's editors which will be abundantly clear when this matter comes to court.
Read this chunk from Nev's statement and tell me it doesn't make you smile with its implicit message:
If Coulson goes down, whether he cops for it or - to borrow that Brooksism - "vigorously defends the allegations" but is disbelieved by the jury, Dave looks a dick who either (i) knowingly hired a crook or (ii) unknowingly hired a crook, on the word of the crook.
That's a straight choice between being bent himself, or just a credulous twat with poor judgement, with varying shades of shit in between.
So Coulson coming over all Abe Lincoln this late in the game would not really work if he wanted to 'protect the government'
What we need is a proper Inquiry into these things, headed up by a judge and stuff, where he could be made to answer these questions ...
Was Blunkett called before Leveson? If not why not? Some research needed here I think.
Rupert Murdoch's News International has approved a confidential payout to the former home secretary David Blunkett over allegations that his phone was hacked.
The exact size of the payout is not clear. However, three well-placed sources familiar with the negotiations suggest the payout to Blunkett and several others is worth around £300,000.
....
His register of interests entry shows that he advises News International on corporate social responsibility issues on a six-month contract, worth £25,000. He also has an advice column for the Times, worth up to £5,000 per financial year. Before October 2009 he wrote a column for the Sun worth around £45,000 a year.
Isn't this a bit like Henry Kissinger getting the Nobel Peace Prize.His register of interests entry shows that he advises News International on corporate social responsibility issues
Isn't this a bit like Henry Kissinger getting the Nobel Peace Prize.
You forgot the signature line!'George, I know it's not your birthday, but I saw this Sacrifical Lamb costume and thought of you'.
L.O.L. Dave
Yep, if I was forced to put a fiver on it now I'd predict not guilty for Coulson and Wade (didn't know, ddn't ask...), though we haven't seen how bad the evidence is yet. Mr Mulcaire may well be revisiting his old haunts though.Many a slip between charge and guilty verdict
Well - as with the other charges agasint the Brookses - you'd expect that the CPS must have some pretty good evidence before talking them on - witnesss from NI prepared to drop them in the shit, evidence on computers (one is reminded of a certain lap top dumped in a bin) , e-mails etc.
Any news on likely trial dates?