So, George due up now. This should be tasty.
... ended up being tasteless and dull.
Innit. I was hoping for something juicy to come out of it, but no such luck.
John Major tomorrow. That'll be thrilling.
so basically they are now admitting that the full extent of scrutiny of future likely problems re; phonehacking were a) asking Coulson and then b) asking Brooks. jesus, why didn't Jay and/or leveson really go to town on that one?
What was there to fend off?Osborne was surprisingly assured i thought. Fended off everything pretty easily.
if you are right - and you probably are - then that is, literally, scandalousBecause they already know the answer to that question - IMHO by the time Coulson was appointed, NI knew what had gone on*, as did Labour, as (probably) did the Tories, as did the Police, as did most of Fleet Street (Flat Earth News being published in 2008) and so did many people in Westminster. They didnt conduct a further check because they already knew what Coulson had done, and didnt give a toss.
* ie the full extent of what had gone on, not just phonehacking
see my last 2 posts; atrociously lax scrutiny of their chief spinner, given he'd been forced to resign in disgrace from his previous jobWhat was there to fend off?
ermm...he was the prime mover in getting AC hired, I thought?Nothing to do with Osborne.
Tried to, just couldn't take it in.Anyone else watching this? Oborne is really going for them, its great TV.
nothing to do with leveson.ermm...he was the prime mover in getting AC hired, I thought?
he made the initial approach, recommended him to Cameron with a phrase like "look what he did to us over 'hug a hoodie, now think what he can do for us"...or have I got this wrong?
it certainly is....as L_C just pointed outnothing to do with leveson.
Fair enough. Still don't think there was much to fend off at this point. After all - how could we have done the work that this committee and various police investigations have done at the cost of many millions and god knows how many hours of work. That's always an easy get-out at the end of this i'm afraid. For now anyway.it certainly is....as L_C just pointed out
yeah that's very true ("who d'you think we are - the FBI?"), and he'd willingly use it. more questioning on that matter would have been fun, 'thoThat's always an easy get-out at the end of this i'm afraid. For now anyway.
John Major tomorrow. That'll be thrilling.
wrong. Charges were considered for various soldiers who had obviously lied to the Saville Inquiry. I dont think any were actually brought thofwiw, It's not a courtroom so Murdoch didn't commit perjury.
I have no idea why they wave the bible about at Public Inquiries - may be a reason but otherwise it looks like theatre.
fwiw, It's not a courtroom so Murdoch didn't commit perjury.
I have no idea why they wave the bible about at Public Inquiries - may be a reason but otherwise it looks like theatre.
Sure, it's sitting in court 72 at the High Court. As to why... like I said, you wouldn't think Leveson himself would he comfortable with pure theatre so perhaps there is a reason I'm not aware of. In the meantime, s1(2) here really isn't helpful:I think it is being held in a courtroom, and why bother with the oath if it can't result in perjury?
You talking to me, Butch?I thought this cunt had been sent midlands way?