Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Missing Milly Dowler's voicemail "hacked by News of the World"

So, George due up now. This should be tasty.

... ended up being tasteless and dull.

Brown on the other hand was all over the shop, his claim (as elbows notes above) that he didnt know and wouldnt have approved of both the Watson anti-Blair plot, the briefing against colleagues, and the McBride / Draper / Whelan stuff was laughable - and will have damaged everything else that he was saying.
 
so basically they are now admitting that the full extent of scrutiny of future likely problems re; phonehacking were a) asking Coulson and then b) asking Brooks. jesus, why didn't Jay and/or leveson really go to town on that one?
 
Innit. I was hoping for something juicy to come out of it, but no such luck.

John Major tomorrow. That'll be thrilling. :D

Don't forget all the Scallywag stuff, plus there's Aitken getting his knees done by the Grauniad (David Leigh blagging wasn't it?), and Mellor too - plenty of juice ready to be squeezed if Mr Jay is in the mood.
 
so basically they are now admitting that the full extent of scrutiny of future likely problems re; phonehacking were a) asking Coulson and then b) asking Brooks. jesus, why didn't Jay and/or leveson really go to town on that one?

Because they already know the answer to that question - IMHO by the time Coulson was appointed, NI knew what had gone on*, as did Labour, as (probably) did the Tories, as did the Police, as did most of Fleet Street (Flat Earth News being published in 2008) and so did many people in Westminster. They didnt conduct a further check because they already knew what Coulson had done, and didnt give a toss.

* ie the full extent of what had gone on, not just phonehacking
 
Because they already know the answer to that question - IMHO by the time Coulson was appointed, NI knew what had gone on*, as did Labour, as (probably) did the Tories, as did the Police, as did most of Fleet Street (Flat Earth News being published in 2008) and so did many people in Westminster. They didnt conduct a further check because they already knew what Coulson had done, and didnt give a toss.

* ie the full extent of what had gone on, not just phonehacking
if you are right - and you probably are - then that is, literally, scandalous
 
it certainly is....as L_C just pointed out
Fair enough. Still don't think there was much to fend off at this point. After all - how could we have done the work that this committee and various police investigations have done at the cost of many millions and god knows how many hours of work. That's always an easy get-out at the end of this i'm afraid. For now anyway.
 
fwiw, It's not a courtroom so Murdoch didn't commit perjury.

I have no idea why they wave the bible about at Public Inquiries - may be a reason but otherwise it looks like theatre.
 
John Major tomorrow. That'll be thrilling. :D

And, apparently, it is being most considerably thrilling :)

He may wear his underpants on the outside, he may have been touchy about the world knowing that... and he definitely is a Tory. But :) :)

Murdoch's brazen lie to a public inquiry, under oath, definitely speaks to whether he's a "fit and proper person" to own a media corporation.
 
fwiw, It's not a courtroom so Murdoch didn't commit perjury.

I have no idea why they wave the bible about at Public Inquiries - may be a reason but otherwise it looks like theatre.
wrong. Charges were considered for various soldiers who had obviously lied to the Saville Inquiry. I dont think any were actually brought tho

"Northern Ireland's Public Prosecution Service said it was investigating, with crown prosecutors in England, whether witnesses had committed perjury at the inquiry. "The Public Prosecution Service (PPS) has now received a copy of the Saville report, which refers to certain witnesses providing evidence to the inquiry which was knowingly untrue."
 
fwiw, It's not a courtroom so Murdoch didn't commit perjury.

I have no idea why they wave the bible about at Public Inquiries - may be a reason but otherwise it looks like theatre.

I think it is being held in a courtroom, and why bother with the oath if it can't result in perjury?
 
BBC chief political correspondent on twitter:

Downing St confirm there will be a minuted record of phone call between Gordon Brown and Rupert Murdoch where "war" threat made #leveson

or not made (the call that is).
 
Brown would obv. know it was minuted, Murdoch wouldn't - assuming there wasn't another less 'official' call as well. Which there could have been given how close the two had been.

I think it is being held in a courtroom, and why bother with the oath if it can't result in perjury?
Sure, it's sitting in court 72 at the High Court. As to why... like I said, you wouldn't think Leveson himself would he comfortable with pure theatre so perhaps there is a reason I'm not aware of. In the meantime, s1(2) here really isn't helpful:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perjury#England_and_Wales

Is Leveson a "judicial proceeding" for the purposes of the Act ...
 
Back
Top Bottom