Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Missing Milly Dowler's voicemail "hacked by News of the World"

Charlie-and-Rebekah-Brook-007.jpg


I've got it bad for this ginger cunt.
 
this already goes way beyond phone-hacking ...

It does indeed. The real killer blow would be if it was shown that NI hacked Labour phones and used that info to aid the Tories. That would be Watergate level stuff and that would bring down the government. Let's hope So.

Cameron has admitted meeting Murdoch executives 26 times in 15 months – but it emerges there were more occasions, many other walks and rides. Labour asks if he ever discussed the BSkyB deal with James Murdoch or Rebekah Brooks? "No," would be an improbable reply. The cabinet secretary Sir Gus O'Donnell has taken an unusually long time to answer Labour MP Ivan Lewis's letter asking if he was informed of private warnings not to employ Coulson. The wobbly, dilatory response to a growing list of questions breeds new rumours: surely it can't be true that News International friends hacked or otherwise stole Labour secrets before the election and passed useful information to the Tories? No, no; that was Watergate.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/18/news-international-ed-miliband
 
God. This is getting close to Cameron.

The Mail on Sunday reported that Cameron intended to hire the BBC's Guto Harri as his press secretary. So close, apparently, was the appointment that the Harri family visited the Camerons one weekend in 2007 at Chipping Norton to discuss it, but the job went to Andy Coulson after Rebekah Brooks "is said to have told Mr Cameron that the post should go to Mr Coulson to strengthen links between the Tories and News International".Is this true? Reviewing the papers on the Andrew Marr programme on Sunday, I pointed out this story and said Harri was well-known in the BBC as a straight-as-a-die, honest man. I was pleased to get a text from Harri just after the show saying "Thanks". Does that mean it is true? I called Harri, who now works for Boris Johnson, to check. Yes, he said he'd heard tell that his name was not acceptable to News International. "I heard it as gossip on the grapevine – but I have no idea whether or not it's true. Yes, I did talk to David Cameron about taking the job – but whilst I lingered they'd clearly approached Andy Coulson." He had a good idea who the source from the Sun was for the story. How Cameron must wish he had given Harri the job. The idea that News International planted their man in the heart of Downing Street is truly shocking.

So Brookes and NI decided who Cameron should or shouldn't have hired! Wow.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/18/news-international-ed-miliband
 
Interesting article in the NYT.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/19/world/europe/19tactics.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&hp

Although most of it is a recap of stuff we already know, there's a few things that haven't been given any focus so far - particularly NI trying to spread the grief.

"Over the last several months, Ms. Brooks spearheaded a strategy that seemed designed to spread the blame across Fleet Street, interviews show. Several former News of the World journalists said that she asked them to dig up evidence of hacking. One said in an interview that Ms. Brooks’s target was not her own newspapers, but her rivals."

Dacre, in particular, seems to be getting on this. Whilst the editor of the fail is unlikely to win any fans here - least of all me - he does seem quite confident of his/The Mail's position.

'Mr. Dacre, The Daily Mail editor, told his senior managers that he had received several reports from businesspeople, soccer stars and public relations agencies that the News International executives Will Lewis and Simon Greenberg had encouraged them to investigate whether their phones had been hacked by Daily Mail newspapers . “They thought it was unfair that all the focus was on The News of the World,” said one News International official with knowledge of the effort. The two men have told colleagues they did not make such calls, but two company officials disputed that.'

Who knows which way all that will go, but at the very least it's a going to be an entertaining spat.
 
It does indeed. The real killer blow would be if it was shown that NI hacked Labour phones and used that info to aid the Tories. That would be Watergate level stuff and that would bring down the government. Let's hope So.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/18/news-international-ed-miliband

Maybe, though it would perhaps be worthwhile to point out that (a) the only safe assumption to make is that everyones phones were hacked at some stage; and (b) it would make sense for NI and the Tories to work very closely together once the NI papers decided to back the Tories, because that is what happened when NI and Labour were an item, after Murdoch backed Blair (to the extent of leaking the election date, leaking Hutton, co-ordinating policy announcements, protecting NI from fallout from its more mindless campaigns* and so on).

* the paedo riots of 2000
 
Maybe, though it would perhaps be worthwhile to point out that (a) the only safe assumption to make is that everyones phones were hacked at some stage; and (b) it would make sense for NI and the Tories to work very closely together once the NI papers decided to back the Tories, because that is what happened when NI and Labour were an item, after Murdoch backed Blair (to the extent of leaking the election date, leaking Hutton, co-ordinating policy announcements, protecting NI from fallout from its more mindless campaigns* and so on).

* the paedo riots of 2000

Yep, it looks like they had this nasty little racket running with successive governments. It just happens that they've been caught at it under a tory one ...
 
Back
Top Bottom