InArduisFouette
Well-Known Member
indeedSorry, but .
i'm a Calibri girl for my CV , having flirted with Gill sans in the past ( but not wanting to look too much like Nigel Gresley ... ) serif fonts are apparently harder to read than Sans serif
indeedSorry, but .
how do you find Calibi / Gill sans ( as used by the pre WW2 LNER) / Johnston ( the London Undergrounf font ) ?Speaking as a dyslexic, I find OpenDyslexic harder to read than most normal fonts. Comic sans is no easier or harder, but well, it's Comic fucking sans.
The most important thing for me is white space, large blocks of text are just unreadable. Background colour can help as well, things with less glare are easier to read.
Calibi is fine, Gills sans looks like it would be fine, but to my knowledge never read much using it.how do you find Calibi / Gill sans ( as used by the pre WW2 LNER) / Johnston ( the London Undergrounf font ) ?
It took me two years to get seen on the NHS and during that time, I self-harmed a lot and had at least two suicide attempts.<sigh> Having had a lot of experience around mentally ill people being in hospital, from a personal and (to a lesser extent) professional perspective, I cannot think of anything more obviously abusive and counterproductive than this idea.
Quite apart from the inappropriateness of sending lay people into a psychiatric unit, whose occupants are very likely to react with "Oh, so I can't get any help for my disorder, but there are resources to push me into a job that I probably won't be able to stick for long". And, having encountered some of the kind of people likely to end up doing this work, I strongly suspect that they'll quite possibly undo any good work that might (ideally, ha!) be being done therapeutically.
If the Government REALLY wanted to do something around mental health and work, the only way to do it is to start by resourcing the MH system properly. Too many people end up in hospital after years of the can being kicked down the road, inept and clumsy handling of patients, and a chronic lack of resources to deal with early interventions. Many of them feel betrayed and let down...so having someone breeze in and briskly suggest they write a CV or something is going to go down like a bucket of cold sick. Which, no doubt, will go down on the paperwork as "uncooperative - withdraw benefits".
I really cannot understand how our governments, of whatever stripe, can be so comprehensively ignorant of what needs to be done to improve mental healthcare, or the benefits doing that would have. I suspect it's largely because it would be a long-term project (plenty of those people in acute units will have had difficulties for YEARS), and they're only interested in Quick Wins.
It's obscene.
Speaking as a dyslexic, I find OpenDyslexic harder to read than most normal fonts. Comic sans is no easier or harder, but well, it's Comic fucking sans.
Pale blue is my colour, but for me at least pretty much anything is better than white so pale yellow is probably fine.But I'll get a bollocking if I don't use OpenDyslexic. On a pale yellow background. Although I'm aware that different people do better with different colours; hence coloured glasses, coloured overlays etc which are always person-specific and not one-size-fits-all.
Dominic Penna Political Correspondent
18 November 2024 10:46am GMT
Young unemployed people must take up training or face having their benefits cut under plans being drawn up by the Work and Pensions Secretary.
Liz Kendall has promised to introduce a “Youth Guarantee” that will aim to increase opportunities for adults aged 18 to 21.
Local authorities will offer support to all unemployed people in this group to help them find employment or education.
But The Times reported that Ms Kendall “will not allow” young adults not to be in some form of education, employment, or training, and will strip benefits from those who do not take up offers of support.
A government source told the newspaper that the proposals would usher in “the biggest reforms to employment support in a generation”. The source said: “Conditionality is a fundamental principle of the social security system and has always existed. That’s not going to change.”
The Prime Minister’s official deputy spokesman downplayed suggestions the policy could punish care leavers who could be left without any income if stripped of their benefits.
“Our focus is on making sure we get people into work and that should be a priority,” the spokesman said. “We will approach this in a balanced way and no doubt the department in preparing this will be alive to these issues. The priority is ensuring that we have a system in place that is tackling inactivity.”
Some 874,000 young people are Not in Education, Employment or Training (Neet), according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). The figures represent a rise of almost 75,000 on the previous year, while 41,000 more people aged 18 to 21 are now unemployed than before the pandemic.
Before the general election, Labour promised to introduce “a new Youth Guarantee which will make sure young people are either earning or learning”.
The party said it stood ready to take “the tough action necessary” to boost the career prospects of young people.
The Youth Guarantee scheme will place an added emphasis on giving power to councils and mayors, shifting power away from Whitehall to deliver joined-up plans.
These will bring together work, health and skills resources to tackle economic inactivity, which the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has made one of its top priorities.
Britain’s welfare bill has soared in recent years amid a surge in claims for mental health conditions, meaning one in 10 adults of working age are now on sickness benefits.
No to mention that this is what occupational therapists are for - no doubt, some money-saving exercise has dispensed with them.On the subject. I have been informed by somebody in Lambeth Hospital that there is a dearth of things for patients to do. Such as an acute ward with one pack of cards and a single jigsaw puzzle to keep 25 patients occupied. How about we give them board games instead of DWP job coaches. Cheaper and likely to be way more useful.
They appear to exist but be a scarce resource with pretty much zero access to a budget.No to mention that this is what occupational therapists are for - no doubt, some money-saving exercise has dispensed with them.
Can't waste money on people who aren't being productive perish the very thought.They appear to exist but be a scarce resource with pretty much zero access to a budget.
Exactly. "Why aren't they just locked in their rooms and tranked up until they are practically comatose like in the good old days?"Can't waste money on people who aren't being productive perish the very thought.
Locking people up in rooms is likely to be more expensive, staff costs-wise. This is me being cynical, btwExactly. "Why aren't they just locked in their rooms and tranked up until they are practically comatose like in the good old days?"
“Employers are desperate to recruit,” she said. “People are desperate to earn money and get on in their jobs. So we need big change. We need to see change in our jobcentres from a one-size-fits-all benefit administration service to a genuine public employment service. It’s not fit for purpose and it has to change.
“When only one in six employers use a jobcentre to recruit, that is a major issue. We’ve got to change the way we work to make sure employers want to use us and that people looking for a job have got the skills employers need.”
Armed forces spring to mind . A senior non-commissioned was thought to be a bit mad by everyone and given to ranting and weird obsessions and other eccentricities. Only on his discharge medical was he found to be mentally ill and in need of medication and hospitalisation.And what jobs could anyone who's severely ill enough to be admitted to hospital do, exactly?