bcuster
Well-Known Member
Pliosaur discovery: Huge sea monster emerges from Dorset cliffs
Scientists marvel at the fossilised head of an underwater 'killing machine' from the Jurassic.
www.yahoo.com
A million miles from Swindon.adding this to my list
Wayland's Smithy
Neolithic Chambered Long Barrow
East of Ashbury, Oxfordshire OS Map Ref SU28098539
near swindon
View attachment 404356
Sensational report that Indonesia’s Gunung Padang site is 25,000 years old
the previous record holder, Turkey’s Göbekli Tepe stone monuments, are thought to be about 11,000 years old.
And the Guardian throws in some irrelevant information just to cast doubtBut Gunung Padang could be more than twice the age of these ancient megaliths, say the authors in a paper in Archaeological Prospection. “Evidence from Gunung Padang suggests advanced construction practices were already present when agriculture had, perhaps, not yet been invented,” they claim.
Controversy has been fuelled by the discovery that the paper was proofread by the controversial British writer Graham Hancock. He argues that a once sophisticated, ancient culture – subsequently destroyed in a cosmic incident – brought science, technology, agriculture and monumental architecture to the primitive people who populated the world after the last ice age. Gunung Padang could be an example of their handiwork, he has suggested in his Netflix series, Ancient Apocalypse.
Natawidjaja told the Observer last week that he considered Hancock’s ideas to be “a reasonable working hypothesis”.
The Gunung Padang claim or the one about Gobekli Tepe?I think that this claim is very implausible.
Gunung Padang. The Gobekli Tepe claims are not that out of line with what was already known, and as far as I know they are not contested.The Gunung Padang claim or the one about Gobekli Tepe?
Hard agree if it's the first. Young Shippy almost fell for some of that stuff. Got a few of those 10000 year old lost civilisation books. Very skeptical about that kinda stuff nowadays.
Didn't think Gobekli Tepe was controversial nowadays. Cool to hear about painted statues though.
Gunung Padang. The Gobekli Tepe claims are not that out of line with what was already known, and as far as I know they are not contested.
and is even more of a loon in his spare timeGraham Hancock is simply someone who does what he does for fame and fortune.
Oh, is he on this thread? That explains things.Or is it just because I have twatface on ignore?
As for even older "civilization", it isn't impossible, but if it existed it wasn't widespread. We'd see evidence of farming in the pollen record, and it would be strange indeed to not have found any archaeological remains.
I thought that part of thrill of this is that it is pre-agraculture?
Absolute bullshit.The consensus seems to be that GT was deliberately destroyed and concealed.
Only ones he's allowed on for now. Probably won't take long till he pulls his usual bullshit tho. He seems as ignorant on the subject as he is about most things.Oh god he’s discovered the non politics forums
Can people just stop interacting with him. It makes threads unreadable.
The "deliberate burial" hypothesis is outdated. More detailed stratigraphic analysis and C14 dating of charcoal fragments embedded in mud mortar has revealed a layered history of the site, with older buildings collapsing, being abandoned, parts reused, buildings re-excavated, repaired/restructured and re-used.Good to see you Crispy.
The consensus seems to be that GT was deliberately destroyed and concealed. If that practice was widespread it would explain the absence of remains.
And I believe there is evidence of ultra-ancient farming in the pollen record, in California among other places. David Graeber writes about it in The Dawn of Everything.
Any agricultural pollen in ancient California is still within the Holocene though, just by considering the earliest evidence for humans in the Americas. As you say, small-scale farming was often practised alongside hunting/gathering and pasturalism. And as GT (and many other similar sites) show, you don't need agriculture for complex societies to develop. But as soon as you scale agriculture up to a collective endeavour, the resulting surplus makes it far easier for such societies to form. And when it does happen, it leaves a massive mark. The agricultural revolutions in the middle East, China, America etc. are blindingly obvious in the archaeology and there's just no sign of it at scale before then. Maybe it will be discovered one day and that would be fascinating.