Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

McLibel leaflet co-written by undercover cop

I always assumed after Ian Tomlinson that he was the Mets poodle


He may well have been their poodle before a copper killed Ian Tomlinson, but a few people were surprised when he accepted the job of poodle in chief.

I feel a bit shitty about having posted on this thread, without expressing my respect to Helen and everyone else who have dragged themselves through the courts over this. Fair play to them all.
 
One of the issues driving this is the persistent revolving door between the public (police) and private intelligence gatherers.

For instance, former senior Special Branch detective Rod Leeming, who in the late 1990s ran the Animal Rights National Index (ARNI), an intelligence gathering unit based at New Scotland Yard which subsequently became the National Public Order Intelligence Unit (NPOIU), left the police in 2001 and the same year established Global Open private security agency.

ARNI, which specialised in monitoring animal rights and environmental groups and activists, was the source of much of the intelligence on London Greenpeace supplied by Special Branch to the McDonald's UK 'Security Department' run by former Met coppers Sid Nicholson and Terry Carrol in the early 1990s before McDonald's were able to identify and then serve writs on five LGP members. During the trial it was established that the police had passed on personal information on LGP activists - including the McLibel Two defendants - to the McDonald's 'Security Department'; subsequently the Met were forced into making a large out-of-court settlement and agreed to "remind" officers that such disclosures are inappropriate (not to mention illegal).

The NPOIU was the unit competing with the Special Demonstration Squad (SDS) in placing undercover police assets into political campaigns and activist groups from the late 1990s onwards. Mark Kennedy, AKA 'Mark Stone', was an NPOIU officer so deployed; on exfiltration, he was assisted in setting up his own arms-length private security company (Tokra) by Global Open and, it is believed, also worked for GO.

Meanwhile, the success of animal rights campaigns such as those against various test animal breeding facilities (closing down Hill Grove Cats, Newchurch Guinea Pigs, Shamrock Farm (monkeys) and Consort Beagles) - which looked to culminate in the campaign against Huntingdon Live Sciences - led to great corporate pressure on the government, which in turn placed pressure on the police. The National Extremism Tactical Coordination Unit (NETCU) was duly set up in 2004. It closely monitored activists, maintained databases and briefed companies with privileged police intelligence. Eventually the SHAC group was neutralised through a combination of draconian new statute, extreme harassment and extensive surveillance.
 
Why does the Royal Mail need access to the PNC? And what will happen when it is privatized by Joe Bloggs Cheapo Deliveries Corp. et al.
 
Why does the Royal Mail need access to the PNC? And what will happen when it is privatized by Joe Bloggs Cheapo Deliveries Corp. et al.


Good point. I think they have a pretty vigorous internal security division to track down theft from the mail. Seem to remember it has a statutory footing.

ETA:- https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/post_office_investigation_branch_2

ETTA:- Apparently they pre-date the police and used to get people executed:-

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/28410/response/73875/attach/4/Brief History of Security in Royal Mail.pdf
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/requ...4/Brief History of Security in Royal Mail.pdf
The investigators in particular are trained to rigorous standards and operate in accordance
with all requisite legislation, including the Police & Criminal Evidence Act, the Regulation of
Investigatory Powers Act and the Postal Services Act. Security managers normally have
experience in a wide range of operational and commercial areas, and develop technical
competence in fields such as crime risk management and modelling, electronic and
mechanical security, behavioural security and so on. At present (2010) there are a total of
287 investigators and security managers employed within Royal Mail Group.
Although bound by the provisions of the acts detailed above and others, and accorded certain
privileges in the use of police facilities and access to criminal records and communication
networks, these days Royal Mail investigators have no special powers or rights. Suspects
are interviewed and searched on a voluntary basis, and where arrests are required the
support of police officers or other statutory law enforcement officers is usually sought.
Royal Mail Legal Services, the successor to the Post Office Solicitor’s Office continues to be
recognized by the Ministry of Justice as a private prosecutor and prosecutes on Royal Mail’s
account in England and Wales. Royal Mail Security teams report alleged criminal activity to
the Procurator Fiscal in Scotland, and to the Public Prosecution Service in Northern Ireland,
following the same processes as police services in those two countries.
Royal Mail Group continues robustly to protect the mail and all other assets that are entrusted
to it and it remains a principle of the Group’s Code of Business Standards and Conduct Code
that those who steal from Royal Mail, or its customers, must expect to be detected and
prosecuted. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/requ...4/Brief History of Security in Royal Mail.pdf
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/requ...4/Brief History of Security in Royal Mail.pdf
 
One of the issues driving this is the persistent revolving door between the public (police) and private intelligence gatherers.

Funny you should mention that. Is there a thread for this yet?


The Serious and Organised Crime Agency (Soca) has withheld from MPs information about the criminal activity of large British firms, it has been alleged.
Soca uncovered illegal activity by insurance and telecoms companies, legal firms and wealthy individuals who paid private investigators to hack computers and steal information from rivals and private individuals.
According to a report leaked to the Independent, Soca compiled a report into private investigators but took no action into the illegal activity they discovered, effectively allowing it to continue.
The report – finished five years ago – was supplied to the Leveson Inquiry into press ethics in 2012 but it was not publicised. Members of Soca later did not mention their report when they appeared before the House of Commons home affairs select committee.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jun/22/hacking-soca-companies-report?INTCMP=SRCH
 
Of related interest:

Bob Lambert's chum & co-director of STREET, Alyas Karmani - also a RESPECT councillor up in Bradford - is back in the news. He's one of five RESPECT councillors who've publicly criticised Gorgeous for his mooting a bid to be London Mayor.

The Grauniad's article is by Helen Pidd, who seems well-versed in West Yorks communitarian politics.

Meanwhile, Galloway's former aide Aisha Ali-Khan (AKA Aisha Kauthar) has been charged in relation to the entry into Galloway's empty home of her 'husband', Afiz Khan - who has also been charged.

Lest you have forgotten, Afiz Khan is a Detective Inspector. With Special Branch - or rather the Met-based SO15 AKA Counter Terrorism Command. And more specifically - some have reported - in the Muslim Contact Unit, which until his suspension pending resolution of this matter, he headed up.

You know, the Muslim Contact Unit? The one set up by Detective Inspector Bob Lambert (AKA Bob Robinson of London Greenpeace and the ALF) and Detective Sergeant Andrew James Boyling (AKA Jim Sutton of Reclaim The Streets).

Ali-Khan and Khan are due to attend a bail hearing at Westminster Magistrates' tomorrow (Thursday 14th August 2013) if anyone in the area fancied popping along.
 
From the Herald today:

The former parliamentary secretary of Bradford West MP George Galloway and a Metropolitan Police officer are due to appear in court today charged with misconduct-related offences.

Aisha Ali-Khan, 33, of Keighley, West Yorkshire, who worked with the Respect MP, faces accusations of encouraging misconduct in a public office, the Metropolitan Police has said.

She is also accused of encouraging the obtaining of personal data without consent on or about August 24 2012.

Detective Inspector Afiz Khan, 46, known as Alfie, is based within the Metropolitan Police's specialist operations unit, and is suspended.

He has been charged with two counts of misconduct in a public office and four counts of data protection offences between May and September last year.

It has been reported that the pair are married but this is unconfirmed.

A force spokesman has said the arrests came as a result of an investigation by the directorate of professional standards into a complaint from a member of the public.

The complaint centred on the actions of the officer, the spokesman said.

One charge of data protection offences in relation to Mr Khan is connected to allegations made by the complainant. The other charges are as a result of information that has been identified as part of the investigation, the spokesman added.

Both were bailed to appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court today.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/...ry-of-george-galloway-due-in-court.1376459792
 
So far, the lengthiest account of yesterday's court action so far appears to be the report in the Mail, which provides the full list of charges, the detail about Choudary, notes Khan headed the MCU, etc.

However, it also describes Aisha Ali-Khan (AKA Aisha Ali AKA Aisha Kauthar) as Khan's "wife" without further comment (elsewhere it is claimed that Khan remains legally married to another woman), and claims both live in Keighley (elsewhere Khan has been described as from Watford whilst Ali-Khan has previously been reported as living in Bradford).

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...jem-Choudary-wife-worked-George-Galloway.html

The briefer Guardian account is more cautious on some of those issues (eg Ali-Khan is said to be "of Keighley" whereas Khan "also gave a Keighley address"; it also notes only that "Ali-Kahn [sic] ...is thought to be [Khan's] wife"), though it too mentions the Choudary-related charge. In addition it reports that one of the charges faced by Khan related to his alleged disclosure to Ali-Khan of personal information about Labour MP Kevin Barron. It does not, however, mention Khan's role at MCU, the unit set up by the paper's former columnist, ex-Special Branch star Bob Lambert - only that he served in SO15.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...-parliamentary-secretary-police-officer-court

Over at the Telegraph we have Choudary; a firm and unambiguous acclamation of matrimony ("wife"); "both from Keighley"; and SO15.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...former-PA-in-court-alongside-her-husband.html

The Sun is now behind a firewall, but what little is available to see for free includes "wife" and Choudary.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/5074223/Cop-leak-rap-over-arrest-of-Anjem-Choudhary.html

The BBC goes with married ("husband"); no mention of MCU (just "specialist operations unit"); her from Keighley with no mention of his domicile; and no mention of the Choudary issue.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23679971

Meanwhile today the Beeb has gone with the jump/push departure of the five 'maverick' Respect councillors in Bradford:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-23716076

For comparison, here's a link to the Bradford Telegraph & Argus version of same:

http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co....cillors_in_Bradford_resign_in_row_with_party/

The Yorkshire Post one appears to have been taken down already:

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news...-quit-party-in-row-over-suspensions-1-5957033
 
Just to reiterate - and this is all rather migraine-inducing - whatever the actual circumstances underlying the charges, there are substantive links between spycop Bob Lambert; his successor as head of the MCU, Detective Inspector Afiz Khan; and the now not-Respect Party councillor in Bradford, Imam Alyas Karmani.

Regardless of whether there was a 'plot' to 'target' George Galloway or not, it is certainly of interest that Khan and Karmani are connected - especially given the connection of each - independently - to Lambert.

To summarise:
  • Lambert was a director of Strategy To Reach Empower and Educate Teenagers (Street UK) Ltd - alongside Abdul Haqq Baker (AKA Anthony Baker), Mohammed Alyas Karmani and Najeeb Ahmed - which was registered at 54 Anson Road in Cricklewood.
  • Lambert was also director at Siraat Ltd - alongside Carey Anderson (AKA Abdur Rahman Anderson) and Raymond Boakye - registered in Coldharbour Lane in Brixton.
  • Lambert's own consultancy, Lambert Consultancy and Training Ltd, featured a board that included himself, his academic collaborator Jonathan Githens-Mazer, plus Gayle Githens-Mazer, and Julia Phillips; and again, it was registered at 54 Anson Road.
  • Meanwhile Baker and Anderson, with Sameer Koomson, were directors of Street Consultancy Ltd (registered at 54 Anson Road).
  • Baker and Ahmed also came together with Valerie Chung as directors of the Southall-registered Initiative For Muslim Progression & Advancement of Community Tolerance (Impact) Ltd.
Feel free to skip through the following excerpts - there may not be anything of great relevance there, bar the connections...

On 54 Anson Road:

Since 1985 the owner of 54 Anson Road – then described as in Willesden – has been Mohamed Ahmed Kagzi. Yet since 2005, Watford-based General Electric subsidiary GE Money Mortgages has loaned on the property.

Mr Kagzi does not have a very wide footprint across company registration; his name throws up only one directorship, Management Ventures, set up in January 2011 and giving 54 Anson Road as its address. Yet Mohammed Ahmed Kagzi only became a director of that company on February 8 – one day after the resignation of the founding director. And who was that? Well, our old friend Graham Michael Cowan – he of paperwork-filling on IMPACT’s registration.

There are at least two other companies trading from 54 Anson Road which have had Graham Michael Cowan as director: Agha Interiors (registered October 2009) and Minerva & Indigo Consultants (registered May 2012).

Anyway, let’s not make mountains out of molehills, and instead move back to Mohammed. Mr Kagzi and his Cricklewood property earned a brief moment in the sunshine in June 2006, when no less an organ of the fourth estate than the Watford Observer reported that 54 Anson Road had “been labelled a sophisticated charitable front with links to Al-Qa’ida.

The article notes that the property was the registered office of Sanabel Relief Agency, “a charity which had its Manchester and Birmingham offices raided by anti-terrorist police last Wednesday” (i.e. 24 May 2006). The Al-Qa’ida connection comes via a February 2006 US Treasury Department report claiming Sanabel’s main work was fundraising for the Bin Laden-linked Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. In addition, Sanabel found itself listed by the UN’s Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee for its purported LIFG links. The assets of five British-based Libyans, including Sanabel volunteer Tahir Nasuf, three Sanabel-linked property companies (Ozlam and Sara in Liverpool, and Meadowbrook Investments in Bristol) and Sanabel itself, which had had charitable status since 2000, were frozen worldwide due to the claims.

Whilst, as the Observer notes, Mohammed Ahmed Kagzi was not named in the US document, and nor was he arrested during the countrywide dragnet, in addition to owning 54 Anson Road, he was also reportedly the registered auditor for Sanabel Relief Agency. It certainly makes him an interesting choice of business partner, and his property an unusual location for your business premises – as the former Special Branch Chief Inspector Bob Lambert did, when he registered his consultancy there little more than two years after it was raided by anti-terrorism cops.

It is not immediately clear why a local paper in Hertfordshire covered a story about a suburban district 14 miles away in Greater London, but the scandal-monger within revels in the Watford connection, being as it is home to Afiz Khan and his (other) family. Anyway, onwards...
 
On the Githens-Mazers, Baker, Karmani, CSTPV, IMPACT and STREET:

...Since December 2010, the Githens-Mazers have been living in a quarter-million pound house in Penryn, Cornwall – somewhat closer to Exeter, where they both work (him at the Uni, her at Peninsula College of Medicine & Dentistry), than Anson Road in leafy NW2.

Lambert, in addition to his work at the EMRC in Exeter, as previously noted also puts in the hours as an online lecturer on the Terrorism Studies course run by the Centre for Study of Terrorism and Political Violence (CSTPV) at the University of St Andrews; so it seems unlikely the ex-copper has the time (or indeed money) for a £650k pied à terre in The Smoke when he lives and works in the toes of England and spends a significant amount of his time Skyping with students up in Scotland.

To make things even more interesting, between May 2008 and November 2009, Lambert was a consultant to another company, Strategy To Reach Empower and Educate Teenagers (STREET UK). He was appointed to STREET on 18 May, twelve days after it was registered. The next day Dr Abdul Haqq Baker – a colleague of Lambert’s from the CSTPV, and according to his biography, the person who initiated STREET – was named as director. In addition, Mohammed Alyas Karmani was added as director in April 2010. The registered address of STREET is… 54 Anson Road in Cricklewood – the same as Lambert Consultancy And Training.[2]

Things now get a bit confusing. According to a paper produced by the Fourth Freedom Forum‘s Center on Global Counterterrorism Cooperation, ‘A Case Study in Government-Community Partnership and Direct Intervention to Counter Violent Extremism‘ (written by Jack Barclay[3], December 2011), STREET “was created and is run largely by members of a Muslim community in south London” and was “[L]aunched in 2006”. The south London location is re-emphasised a number of times: “…Brixton, the immediate south London locale where STREET is based…strong connections to the south London Salafi community…youth in Lambeth and other parts of south London…” and so on. The paper does name Dr Baker as STREET’s founder and managing director, and also names ‘Alyas Karmani’ as a co-director “who joined the programme three years after its inception”.

Are you keeping up? Well, Mohammed Alyas Karmani, AKA Alyas Karmani, AKA Mohammed Karmani, is based in Bradford, where he is now a city councillor for George Galloway’s Respect Party, having beaten the incumbent Labour candidate (and previously the Leader of the council) in the May 2012 local elections. In coverage at the time of the campaign, Karmani was described as “director of Street, a national project working with at-risk young people”. He’s also co-director of a Bradford-registered company called The Diversity Project, along with Saima Butt.

Getting back to the CGCC report… So we have both current directors of STREET quoted in it. We then have a surprise guest appearance by none other than “Robert Lambert, a former head of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) Muslim Contact Unit”. No mention is made of his directorship with STREET, though the author claims that he “has had more than 10 years of close contact with STREET and the south London Salafi community, both as a police officer and subsequently as a scholar at [EMRC]”...

So again, the building up of credentials, and the partial obfuscation of said credentials depending on the circumstances or audience. Next...
 
On Lambert, Baker, Anderson, Boakye and Siraat:

Firebug Bob – or Mr Robert Lambert MBE as he prefers to style himself for the purpose of Companies House registrations – is also director and company secretary of Siraat, set up in January 2009 and based on Coldharbour Lane in Brixton. Hmmm, Brixton, you say? In south London? Why is this ringing bells? His fellow directors are Carey Anderson and Raymond Boakye. Who they? Well, I’d like to know too. The web yields not a lot about Siraat[4] or them, except for a gem of a Telegraph story from February 2011, very Telegraphically entitled ‘Counter-terrorism projects worth £1.2m face axe as part of end of multiculturalism’:
The first to be hit is the Street project, which is associated with Brixton Mosque in South London. The project has received more than £500,000 in three years from the government.

The Daily Telegraph has learned that the Home Office has told the project it will have its money withdrawn this year in the first step towards switching funding away from strains of Islam with which the government disagrees.

The Street project is likely to be only the first to feel the effect of the new policy, with other organisations including Siraat, a £500,000 prison-based mentoring project across southern England and Impact[5] that has received £280,000 and is based in Hounslow, West London, both facing closure.

…[STREET] currently employs 12 staff and received £326,990 in 2009-2010 and £191,310 from 2010 until October this year.

It caters for Muslims from across South London, providing sports and social activities at the mosque youth centre and running classes on Islamic religious precepts, social responsibilities and citizenship. Over the last 18 months, it has completed 12 of the 40 cases it has managed.

The Street project was founded by Abdul Haq [sic] Baker, who is its secretary and one of its directors. Mr Baker is also a trustee of the Brixton Mosque and Islamic Cultural Centre…

Companies Houses notes that there is a proposal to strike Siraat off the register, that the last accounts are ten months overdue, and that the last tax return, which should have been filed in February, hasn’t been. STREET is in similar straits.

So it seems that not everything Dr Robert Lambert MBE turns to gold. The Police Community engagement for Conflict Transformation (PCCT) hub, set up by University of Birmingham academics, seems to be taking no chances and makes no mention of Lambert or the CSTPV, with which (according to Bob) they are in partnership.

Whilst this essay is from last year, the on/off troubles at Siraat continue, as you can see by checking the company's record of CH filings.

Lambert is a man variously described as "displaying a cunning that cemented his reputation as one of the finest spies ever to serve in the SDS", with his "escapades" being "recounted for years to come, burnishing his credentials as one of the most committed ‘hairies’ ever deployed in the field" (Undercover p86/676), and someone who "did what is hands down regarded as the best tour of duty ever" (ex-SDS spy Peter Francis in The Guardian, 23/10/11). So a man who - judged by his police peers - was considered a consummate professional, and highly attuned to convincing deception.

Such skilled deception in the SDS helped him to build the MCU from nothing, with its attendant (if nice) plaudits and professional glory; and from the MCU into private practice - as we shall charitably call it - and a blossoming second career as an academic.

This of course leads us to consider: just what sort of man would be required to fill Lambert's shoes at MCU? And what sort of CV would an annointed successor have? One similar, or dissimilar, to Lambert's own near-twenty years of whispers and lies and set-ups?
 
Oh what tangled webs they weave ...

Some awesome investigation there, Dave.
Cheers - but it is by and large all dribs and drabs from the public domain.

It will be interesting to see how the Khan case goes. Whilst we cannot currently speculate as to his possible guilt or innocence with regards the charges laid before him, we can certainly hypothesise about his duties at MCU, and with luck we shall see more details emerge about his pre-MCU Special Branch career.
 
Cheers - but it is by and large all dribs and drabs from the public domain.

It will be interesting to see how the Khan case goes. Whilst we cannot currently speculate as to his possible guilt or innocence with regards the charges laid before him, we can certainly hypothesise about his duties at MCU, and with luck we shall see more details emerge about his pre-MCU Special Branch career.
But there's a lot of work there pulling together everything that's been reported and making all the connections. A lot of work.
 
In case you hadn't seen it, here's the New Yorker piece which came out today.

You may be familiar with the basic elements of the story, but this is the first time some of the background details have been publicly aired. And some of them are gruesome.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/08/25/the-spy-who-loved-me-2

It tells the story of Jacqui (previously referred to as ‘Charlotte’), the woman who once upon a time fell in love with a dashing animal rights activist named ‘Bob Robinson’.

In reality, ‘Robinson’ was Robert Lambert, a career-long veteran of Special Branch, who in 1983 was sent deep undercover to infiltrate political groups on behalf of the secretive Special Demonstration Squad.

Almost immediately after being deployed on the ground, complete with the stolen identity of a dead child, Lambert sought out Jacqui at a protest, and began to woo her - which helped ease his way into animal rights groups that she was on the periphery of. Pretty soon they were an item, and by Christmas of 1984 Jacqui fell pregnant with Bob's son.

But in 1987 the relationship fell apart, as Bob became increasingly distant, argumentative, provocative. He began an 18 month relationship with another woman, ‘Karen’, who not part of any activist scene. In 1988, he disappeared completely from the lives of Jacqui, ‘Karen’ and all the people he had befriended during his adventure as a spy - ostensibly on the run in Spain to avoid the clutches of Special Branch, who had already arrested two other members of Bob's ALF incendiary bomb gang.

Between 1988 and late 2012, he made no attempt to remain in the life of his son. It was only when Jacqui realised that her long-disappeared ‘Bob Robinson’ was the same man as the former secret policeman Bob Lambert who had been accused of having set off a firebomb that gutted a department store whilst an undercover policeman, and tracked him down, that he showed any interest in his own progeny.

And that, in a nutshell, is the “genuine personal feelings” that the Met Police, recently forced to admit that Lambert was one of its spies, thinks drove Lambert to seek out an impressionable young activist, pester her into a relationship, impregnate her, emotionally bully her, dump her and then disappear from her life and the life of their son.

[Cross-posted]
 
I feel a bit shitty about having posted on this thread, without expressing my respect to Helen and everyone else who have dragged themselves through the courts over this. Fair play to them all.

Indeed, massive respect to all.
 
He may well have been their poodle before a copper killed Ian Tomlinson, but a few people were surprised when he accepted the job of poodle in chief.

I feel a bit shitty about having posted on this thread, without expressing my respect to Helen and everyone else who have dragged themselves through the courts over this. Fair play to them all.
and may all their enemies be confounded.
 
Back
Top Bottom