cesare
shady's dreams ♥
He's more amusing than Blair and his Blairitism - if that's a thing - doesn't detract from the point.Eddie Izzard is a vile Blairite imo
He's more amusing than Blair and his Blairitism - if that's a thing - doesn't detract from the point.Eddie Izzard is a vile Blairite imo
Especially to your Irish colleagues.
I'd back any artificial intelligence over your very real stupidity.
Pst they were movies. I know you have trouble differentiating fantasy & reality.
Yep, and I see no reason to disbelieve IS when they say that the targets were carefully chosen.
There wouldn't have been the same mass grief outpouring and solidarity if they'd restricted their carnage to politicians and others of the ruling class - agreed. Not rocket science though isit "carefully chosen".More good stuff from Kenan Malik.
"The cafes, restaurants, bars and music venue that were attacked - Le Carillon, La Belle Equipe, Le Petit Cambodge, and the Jewish-owned Bataclan - are in the 10th and 11th arrondissements, areas that, though increasingly gentrified, remain ethnically and culturally mixed and still with a working-class presence.
[...] the Stade de France, like France's national football team, also has great cultural resonance. "Les Bleus" - as the team is known - are seen by many as an embodiment of multicultural France, a team consisting of "noir, blanc, beur" (black, white, Arab) players. [...]
What the terrorists despised, what they tried to eliminate, were ordinary people drinking, eating, laughing, and mixing. That is what they hated - not so much the French state as the values of diversity and pluralism."
Exactly.
Especially to your Irish colleagues.
Because, as Malik points out, they may have been 'easy' targets but they weren't random.Why not? Such a statement might have been plausible after the Hebdo murders (and even then it is debatable), but not with these attacks.
One of the points from the long Malik piece I linked to is that it's not about social inequality, but social disengagement.So .. 3 of the people who blew themselves to bits last night were from a place called Molenbeek in Belgium?
Looks lovely from google maps, perfectly tidy, no idea why anyone living there would feel, you know, atomised or go on the internet for a sense of meaning & identity / belonging in the world.
View attachment 79649
Because, as Malik points out, they may have been 'easy' targets but they weren't random.
I am still hopeful that the tactic will backfire, that we will see a strengthening of movements to unite people, that picking on the very people who do not seek division will prove a bad miscalculation.
yeh,stenographyThat is shorthand.
I'd double like your post if i could but sadly ( as in x11 sadly) i think division & polarisation is most of the point of the action last night.Because, as Malik points out, they may have been 'easy' targets but they weren't random.
I am still hopeful that the tactic will backfire, that we will see a strengthening of movements to unite people, that picking on the very people who do not seek division will prove a bad miscalculation.
It wasn't my link.From your link: "Syrian passports are known to be valuable currency amongst those trying to enter Europe, and it is not yet confirmed whether the holder of the passport is indeed the perpetrator."
When we last had proposals for ID cards in the UK, one of the arguments was that it would be harder for terrorists to operate if there were ID Cards in force. Didn't make much difference here did it!Everyone carries ID.
See above.I thought france germany and italy all had national ID card schemes anyway, non passport but state led and good enough to travel on/placate a policeman
They might have been carefully chosen, but instead of entering the stadium and getting close to Holland who could be described as a primary target, the terrorists blew themselves up outside.Yep, and I see no reason to disbelieve IS when they say that the targets were carefully chosen.
I guess the aftermath social engagement resulting from friends and neighbours being mown down is something that governments in the near vicinity, mostly Europe, are now quite anxious to focus on the aggressor rather than the ruling class that caused the conflicts.One of the points from the long Malik piece I linked to is that it's not about social inequality, but social disengagement.
I'd double like your post if i could but sadly ( as in x11 sadly) i think division & polarisation is most of the point of the action last night.
For you, Dumb and Dumber is a reality.
Because, as Malik points out, they may have been 'easy' targets but they weren't random.
Your Malik lecture has helped me make the connection between what just happened and that tidy but uniform street in Brussels, re the search for identity and belonging.One of the points from the long Malik piece I linked to is that it's not about social inequality, but social disengagement.
The terrorists who murdered Lee Rigby explicitly said that they wanted a backlash against ordinary Muslims as a result.
Daesh explicilty want polarisation its a stated part of their strategy.
Lloyd & Harry are in MENSA compared to you.
Daesh explicilty want polarisation its a stated part of their strategy.
Yep, and it can't be said often enough, I don't think. This has to be the response to the challenge of the likes of le Pen - she is doing their work for them, do not give in to this.Daesh explicilty want polarisation its a stated part of their strategy.
Yep, and it can't be said often enough, I don't think. This has to be the response to the challenge of the likes of le Pen - she is doing their work for them, do not give in to this.
This is something that we have to keep repeating. It's depressing to watch people on social media walking right into their carefully set, but anything but secret, trap.Daesh explicilty want polarisation its a stated part of their strategy.
They might have been carefully chosen, but instead of entering the stadium and getting close to Holland who could be described as a primary target, the terrorists blew themselves up outside.
Yep, and it can't be said often enough, I don't think. This has to be the response to the challenge of the likes of le Pen - she is doing their work for them, do not give in to this.
Or to any country who was viciously oppressed by the British say in the last 100 years. Plenty of people around the world associate the Union Jack with imperialism & jingoism.