It's not one sided, it's down-the-line theology 101 but you're right it may not be the right thread for it.
I disagree, but appreciate the reply.
It's not one sided, it's down-the-line theology 101 but you're right it may not be the right thread for it.
Er I think you'll find that the jewish, christian or muslim god is in fact alien to these fair isles as those religions emanate from palestine and arabia respectively
Of course not but they don't need to. Scholastic justifications for their strain of Islam already exist. I'd link to one but I really don't want to, nobody needs to read that crap (and those kinds of commentaries aren't hard to Google for)
Of course not but they don't need to. Scholastic justifications for their strain of Islam already exist. I'd link to one but I really don't want to, nobody needs to read that crap (and those kinds of commentaries aren't hard to Google for)
Didn't know you were a British Israelite nixon.
I'd say that we DO need to read such crap, if we want to understand where Islamists are "coming from". If we read such stuff in context - both original, and modern interpreted context - we get a good picture of how corrupted from the original message the Islamist version is, and why it is corrupt.
It's not one sided, it's down-the-line theology 101 but you're right it may not be the right thread for it.
My only disagreement here is with the idea that an original idea existed, and even if it did, it would be possible to reconstruct, access or even understand any such construction. Renan's positivism just isn't available anymore here.
The lost Britain of yore for which Doubledown pines doesn't have room for any of that imported nonsense, Jesus being a bloody foreigner too of course. Just oak trees and heroic mists, maybe some bunting.
Where do the gospels tell us jesus lived? And the arabian peninsula well-known as the birthplace of islam. So unless you think matthew, mark, luke, john, thomas and indeed judas, not to mention the author of acts were lying, less of your misinformed gobshitery.No. They may not be indigenous, but your locating origin is problematic.
There's always an original idea, albeit often deeply buried, but of course that idea is going to be historically situated and, therefore, possibly not amenable to modern-day analysis even by "experts", let alone laymen.
pisspoor platitudesThe unfairness of it is what burns
one people's religions and culture
let not one hair be put out of place
and every woman kept in theirs
Politeness has become a curse
punishable to criticise an alien God
that is on the rise
Nothing about your culture be changed
let your theocracy prevail
But my heritage has just much right
not in the Koran but in the heritage of Britain
its history, its and great people and way of life
But to say so is trodden on
I won't call them do-gooders
because they do not do good
or love Islam they just hate the critic's of Islam more.
By doctrine driven as a communist directive
all facts forced a fit the party line.
Defeat the Tories through open borders
up the numbers, pander to get their vote
I do not dwell on the past, what is done is done
All have a right to exist
But there is painful grieving to be done
for the Britain which is no more.
Where do the gospels tell us jesus lived? And the arabian peninsula well-known as the birthplace of islam. So unless you think matthew, mark, luke, john, thomas and indeed judas, not to mention the author of acts were lying, less of your misinformed gobshitery.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.My advice to you is to stop now. It is well meaning advice.
No. They may not be indigenous, but your locating origin is problematic.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
What happens if I have the temerity to ignore your well meaning advice, bnp?
b&p then.First I am going to ask you to stop using the short form 'bnp'. It implies and suggests, by way of association, a relationship about which I am uncomfortable and disagree with strongly.
b&p then.
I'd say that we DO need to read such crap, if we want to understand where Islamists are "coming from". If we read such stuff in context - both original, and modern interpreted context - we get a good picture of how corrupted from the original message the Islamist version is, and why it is corrupt.
Why do you consider this stuff as 'crap'?
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
What happens if I have the temerity to ignore your well meaning advice, bnp?
I've read quite a lot of that kind of thing in the last few years and I find it hard going. Knock yourself out .. IMO it's a waste of effort but by all means ruin your day on google. I'll still not link to anything because I wouldn't link to nazi crap either.
Because it's violent, delusional, psychopathic and awful.
the identification of 'Islam' with Arabia is problematic
I've read quite a lot of that kind of thing in the last few years and I find it hard going. Knock yourself out .. IMO it's a waste of effort but by all means ruin your day on google. I'll still not link to anything because I wouldn't link to nazi crap either.
Okay - what is violent, delusional etc.?
I've been an anti-fascist for nearly 40 years, and I've found that you can't understand how these variants spring up, unless you're prepared to immerse yourself in the mire. I have copies of "Mein Kampf", "The Protocols..." and many other "crap" texts on my bookshelves, because I believe that "know your enemy" is a rational approach.
I've already said I'm not going to be linking to anything.
Try some intelligent internet searching if you need edifying in such a way.
Is the fact also problematic that the Koran and Hadiths are written in medieval Arabic and generally studying outside of that language is frowned upon, if not roundly condemned?