Maybe the power bit could be incidental. Like if you just really can't get any sex, and your desperate for it. You might rape someone just to get sex, but not be gratified or enjoy the power or enjoy the violence.
Christ, that sounds well suspect
any description of rape motives is going to sound suspect. but i agree with you, the whole power and domination aspect is overplayed.
i feel this is because that endorses the feminist narrative of rape being about the oppression of women for power's own sake, rather than that domination being the inevitable part of forced sex, where the sex is the only motive.
when viewed this way the question of provocative dress can never arise. do i think women are to blame for sexual assaults because of what they wear?
of course not. it's 100% the fault of the man
would i let my daughter go out dressed just in her underwear?
not on your life
at the dance it would regularly kick off after sexual assaults, where a girl got groped on the dancefloor. it was our number one source of trouble after dealing, and would tend to happen in the daylight hours after we'd been running all night. now did that mean that the longer they were there, the more men wanted to oppress the women present to feel powerful?
or did it mean that after eight hours of being on drugs and dancing with scantily dressed girls they were so visually stimulated that they couldn't keep their hands to themselves?
we all know that male sexuality is different to female, and that men are much more aroused by visual stimulus, whereas for women other factors such as touch will heighten their arousal. speaking as someone who has suffered great periods of loneliness and sexual frustration, the urge to reach out and touch can be pretty overwhelming. i've never groped anyone, but i'm pretty well tied down, more so than any other bloke i know. my dad calls me a monk
so, knowing what can be going through a bloke's mind, understanding the level of stimulation a man can feel being surrounded by something he's supposed to admire but not touch, i tend to see scantily clad girls in the dance as being irresponsible troublemakers, and there's a 50:50 chance i'm going to have to intervene in a fight as a result of their desire to proclaim their sexuality.
and the next dance they tend to dress a bit less provocatively.
some of the people i've seen on the news representing slutwalk talk as though they are living in a vacumn, as though the undeniable absolute freedom to wear whatever you want is without any attendant responsibility for the reaction it causes. to me this is completely wrong headed.
in effect, girls showing loads of flesh like to provoke a response, but my argument is you can neither guarantee or control the response you will get.
i believe it is my basic human right to walk down the road smoking a big fat doobie, but prudence dictates otherwise
anyway, i know i will get roasted, but i speak as someone who has been on the front line in this one, taken and given digs just to be part of someone else's learning the truth about the big bad world.
to me, the basic feminist agenda can seem anti-male. yet why is it that they are so blind to how bad men really are? if you go out wearing skimpy clothes then you either have a naive view of the world, live in a security bubble or are a cage fighter in drag