chilango
Hypothetical Wanker
Yeah, was trying to come up with something where that would be the punchline.Just come straight from that wearing your wetsuit.
Yeah, was trying to come up with something where that would be the punchline.Just come straight from that wearing your wetsuit.
Yes I think the illustration bit is great and that should be encouraged. TBF the only place I've seen the image is online where there are links for further info and dates etc...It's quite an unusual and pretty poster, approve of the birdlife, even with the pelican wearing a flat cap. Could they have made the location any harder to read though? Date would be better bigger as well.
Yes I think the illustration bit is great and that should be encouraged. TBF the only place I've seen the image is online where there are links for further info and dates etc...
Wot, no Jackdaw/Stormy Petrel?I'm very much looking forward to all the anarchist and birdlife puns etc.
Pelican and gannet (?) adding nicely the 'anarchist birds' subgroup of Ravens, Crows, Jackdaws, Petrels and of course Sea GullsIt's quite an unusual and pretty poster, approve of the birdlife, even with the pelican wearing a flat cap.
Secretary bird has a much shorter beak, is very differentHmmm, I always thought it was a secretary bird.
TBF Roumm's Wildcat also didn't look much like a real wildcat. Perhaps he was subverting bourgeois realism.Secretary bird has a much shorter beak, is very different
My invitation probably in the balance this year.Will any actual anarchists be allowed to attend or will they have to sign a declaration of submission to the committee?
It’s all a bit “it’s my ball and you’re not playing.”
Embarrassing really.
i've been signing myself off with 'no kind regards' all todayOn one hand I think it'd be better to provide a proper answer to enquiries and avoid any ambiguity, but also as someone who's not feeling particularly motivated at my own job today, I can fully sympathise with the temptation to just reply to all emails with "disinclined".
perhaps we should have continuity bookfair in conway hall and the new bookfair in red lion square.Lisa’s stall request has been vetoed and she is not happy.
“disinclined” lol
there's generally been a deadline in the past before which people could get stalls - perhaps there is one this year, i don't know. but under the auld regime the collective would do their best to accommodate. now there's been a changing of the guard things are different. last time round the acg were barred. this time it's lisa. there seems to have been some decision made about the sort of people the organisers want and the sort of people they don't. and that's not healthy for the movement. back in the day i think there were stalls in the main hall at conway hall and also in the large room at the 'back' (backing onto theobalds road) plus meetings up the windy staircase. might have been windy meetings up the staircase. maybe the organisers can expand and resolve any space issues that way. i think they ought to come clean if there's some other reason behind the refusal or disinclination to give lisa a stall.I do think if people/groups are refused a stall it'd be generally useful and polite to explain why. If it's just a stall selling a book that can be bought elsewhere and there's limited stall space, for example, I think that might be fair enough.
Now the only possible reasons she can think of are that the anarchist bookfair people don't like working class people or genuine collectives, neither of which strike me as the likely reasons that the project has had a stall request rejected.
Perhaps that odd bloke from last time could come back and we could have ten pages of coy back and forth.
That'll learn 'em.i've been signing myself off with 'no kind regards' all today