Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact
  • Hi Guest,
    We have now moved the boards to the new server hardware.
    Search will be impaired while it re-indexes the posts.
    See the thread in the Feedback forum for updates and feedback.
    Lazy Llama

Libertarian Party Uk

Oh dear. There's little point in continuing a conversation with you, Knotted. You're thinking/assumptions are "all over the place". There's a huge (systems) failure on your part here. You define incorrectly, then you make assumptions - heading for a huge logic-fail. It's acutely sad to watch your car-crash reasoning.
 
I'm really curious about this one. Which anarchists are not communists? I don't mean this as a criticism of anarchists - quite the opposite.

[I can understand that not many would want to call themselves communists after Stalinist abuse of the term.]

I'm really curious about this one. Which cats are not fish? I don't mean this as a criticism of cats - quite the opposite.

[I can understand that not many cats would want to call themselves fish after Silurformes' abuse of the term.]

:eek:
 
Oh dear. There's little point in continuing a conversation with you, Knotted. You're thinking/assumptions are "all over the place". There's a huge (systems) failure on your part here. You define incorrectly, then you make assumptions - heading for a huge logic-fail. It's acutely sad to watch your car-crash reasoning.

I take definitions straight from anarchist theory. Everyone makes assumptions, I state mine so that they can be scrutinised.

I am really interested in who these non socialist/communist anarchists are. Individualist anarchists? I thought they were pretty fringe and close to right wing libertarianism anyway?
 
Only the anarcho/anarcha-communist ones.

I think my idea of communism is less specific than yours. I simply mean a society which has abolished all vestiges of capitalism and the state. I'm not particularly interested in speculating about whether there will be communes or syndicates or collectives in such a society, I'd call all three communist.
 
To repeat:



To expand:
Anarchists don't try to maximise liberty in the immediate. They have a long term strategy of communism in which to realise greater liberty. They are willing to coerce now in order to achieve greater liberty later.

I hope that's clear. I am aware that I am generalising and that anarchists are a diverse bunch and that the above is not applicable to all anarchists. I reach the above conclusion by looking at Kropotkin, who in my opinion is the most interesting and coherent anarchist theoretician. Perhaps it is an odd and dated take on anarchism...

This is not true though.
 
You're genuinely surprised that anarchists are involved in direct action and strikes? :eek: You never read any history? Heard of the CNT at all?

Please don't do that. I am genuinely surprised that anarchists would not agree that they socialists or communists.
 
Please don't do that. I am genuinely surprised that anarchists would not agree that they socialists or communists.

Hang on, it was you who was drawing the distinction! Stop going round in circles and changing the goal posts!
 
I said, "opposing exploitation..." I did not say "opposing your own exploitation..."

Anarchists would argue that opposing the exploitation of your class is also self defence. I thought you'd read the anarchist faq? All the arguments I'm using are in there.
 
You're genuinely surprised that anarchists are involved in direct action and strikes? :eek: You never read any history? Heard of the CNT at all?

knotted is so "genuinely surprised" (!) that they ignore the historic struggles of anarchism against authoritarian communism !


To knotted:

Have you actually bothered to study anarchist theory/social science and history, knotted?

Conflating anarchists with 'communists' and 'socialists' shows an appalling lack of understanding. They may share some values/methods/ideas, but have different ways of achieving these. Anarchist collectivism and communes aren't quite the same as communist collectivism and communes.

Whilst it's possible for anarchists to work with non-authoritarian left-communists and non-state left-socialists (and there is evidence in the last 80 years this occurring) it's not possible to work with state/authoritarian/bureaucratic/hierarchical/right-wing communists and top-down socialists.

Anarchist communes and collectivism exist through reference to the needs of the collective or commune, not through reference to the needs of an external ideology.

Communist collectivism, of course, is predicated on referencing communist ideology.
 
Actually, a lot of anarchists would agree that they're socialists. I certainly describe myself as a libertarian socialist. Pretty much synonymous with anarchist as far as I'm concerned.
 
Anarchists would argue that opposing the exploitation of your class is also self defence. I thought you'd read the anarchist faq? All the arguments I'm using are in there.

There are three references to self-defence in the FAQ.

All three are to do with self-defence against violence.
 
There are three references to self-defence in the FAQ.

All three are to do with self-defence against violence.

Maybe it would help if you actually read the thing, rather than doing a quick text search on the pdf? Might help you understand it. Just a thought.
 
How do you know I haven't?

It's obvious from your posts! For you to be able to come up with "three references to self-defence in the FAQ" so quickly can only have been done by a pdf search. If you had actually read the thing, you would recognise the arguments I'm making about solidarity.

waits whil knotted searches the pdf for references to solidarity :D
 
Back
Top Bottom