Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

lefty party predictions

35,000 for TUSC then. A lower average vote than the RCP's Red Front in 1992. Absolutely abysmal. Half a million pissed away on egotism.

e2a: 1987, sorry, not 92

Not half a million and, as has been explained before, money that they were given for this purpose only.

TUSC's votes were predictably small. I'm not a fan at all of the idea of low profile parties standing huge numbers of candidates. But let's at least be fair.
 
In fairness to TUSC what they did was valid, logical and worthwhile - and always doomed to "failure". But they didn't really have any other choice. This was, and remains, the next step on the path they've chosen.

Aye, only real question is what they do next, split off into the composite parts or spend the next few years working on real stuff and building support for next time.
 
The people who run the left wing parties, all of them, must resign en masse and hand over their parties to the youth. (Plus some real leftist economists, see Syriza, Podemos.)
They must go home and never campaign again. They must abandon all their political aspirations, they are rank failures and relentless losers. Go away, give up and get out of the fucking way.

Stand aside mate, I'm younger than you :D
 
Not for next time, for now ( and i know every single person involved is already doing) but all that money...

Am I imagining it or was the deposit money given on the condition be spent that way? Sure I read that somewhere on Urban ( so tenuously reliable source). If so a waste but it is what it is.
 
They did even worse than I expected. What can you expect from thousands of paper candidates though.

TUSC did retain a councillor in Southampton though.

Be fair, most weren't paper candidates, there were active campaigns.

Because it enabled us to put forward Socialist ideas in this election, because its helped us to make contact with hundreds of new contacts up and down the country who want to do something, not just vote, and that matters. Especially now we've got a majority Tory govt to take on. Because Don Thomas got re-elected, and hopefully so have other ex Labour councillors TUSC is working with. Because I'd rather use the elections on our terms than sit at home and moan at the telly and the bleakness of everything.

And because I personally spoiled the Green vote in my ward by standing and caused them to lose a seat to Labour. :cool:
 
Two years ago, the EDL came here, there were thousands on the streets opposing them, lots of old lefty faces, some of then trying to marshal the crowds like generals, absolutely loving it, a few weeks later an anti-atos protest saw about twenty people.
 
Am I imagining it or was the deposit money given on the condition be spent that way? Sure I read that somewhere on Urban ( so tenuously reliable source). If so a waste but it is what it is.

Yes. An old left winger left money to the remains of the Socialist Alliance for electoral purposes only, which the SA remains then dished out for deposits etc. TUSC were not given a large sum of money to spend as they chose.
 
Yes. An old left winger left money to the remains of the Socialist Alliance for electoral purposes only, which the SA remains then dished out for deposits etc. TUSC were not given a large sum of money to spend as they chose.

If it was for 'electoral purposes' could the money not have been used to focus on a handful of reasonable seats rather than the scatter gun thing?
 
If it was for 'electoral purposes' could the money not have been used to focus on a handful of reasonable seats rather than the scatter gun thing?

As I understand it, no, Left Unity were up for doing that but it was a wide challenge kinda deal.

Just so you know though, even if you did spend a lot of money on a couple of seats you'd still only get 50-1000 votes.
 
"“Can’t you see that the problem is you? That politics has nothing to do with being right, that politics is about succeeding?” One can have the best analysis, understand the keys to political developments since the sixteenth century, know that historical materialism is the key to understanding social processes. And what are you going to do — scream that to people? “You are workers and you don’t even know it!”
The enemy wants nothing more than to laugh at you. You can wear a T-shirt with the hammer and sickle. You can even carry a huge flag, and then go back home with your flag, all while the enemy laughs at you. Because the people, the workers, they prefer the enemy to you. They believe him. They understand him when he speaks. They don’t understand you. And maybe you are right! Maybe you can ask your children to write that on your tombstone: “He was always right — but no one ever knew.”"
 
"“Can’t you see that the problem is you? That politics has nothing to do with being right, that politics is about succeeding?” One can have the best analysis, understand the keys to political developments since the sixteenth century, know that historical materialism is the key to understanding social processes. And what are you going to do — scream that to people? “You are workers and you don’t even know it!”
The enemy wants nothing more than to laugh at you. You can wear a T-shirt with the hammer and sickle. You can even carry a huge flag, and then go back home with your flag, all while the enemy laughs at you. Because the people, the workers, they prefer the enemy to you. They believe him. They understand him when he speaks. They don’t understand you. And maybe you are right! Maybe you can ask your children to write that on your tombstone: “He was always right — but no one ever knew.”"

I see you're quoting that wanker Iglesias. Link to the full article so we can read about how strikes are futile.
 
He's just one guy though, what is behind Podemos is much more powerful and significant than that. There is a lot of working class involvement and participation, by both young and old. Age isn't the important thing. But they do seem fresher and a challenge.

I wouldn't be snearing when there are such key tactical lessons to be learnt. From either the electoral approach or what goes behind it.

A mass movement without blahing on about a general strike is hardly a waste of time. What use is a one day general strike every now and then when capital has total control and there's mass unemployment? It has achieved jack fucking shit in Spain, if anything it has demotivated people from more regular struggle.
 
Gerry Carroll of SWP/PBP came second in west belfast with 6798 votes (19%) and I *think* I saw them use the "if this result was repeated across the country" line somewhere. I may have dreamt it however.
 
The Socialist Equality Party stood two candidates in the general election, Katie Rhodes in Glasgow Central and David O’Sullivan in Holborn & St. Pancras, London. Rhodes secured 58 votes and O’Sullivan 108. The purpose of the SEP’s campaign was to raise the necessity of a new socialist movement of the working class, one based on the fight for a workers government in Britain within the framework of a United Socialist States of Europe and a world socialist federation.

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/05/09/brit-m09.html

:hmm:
 
He's just one guy though, what is behind Podemos is much more powerful and significant than that. There is a lot of working class involvement and participation, by both young and old. Age isn't the important thing. But they do seem fresher and a challenge.

I wouldn't be snearing when there are such key tactical lessons to be learnt. From either the electoral approach or what goes behind it.

A mass movement without blahing on about a general strike is hardly a waste of time. What use is a one day general strike every now and then when capital has total control and there's mass unemployment? It has achieved jack fucking shit in Spain, if anything it has demotivated people from more regular struggle.

I'm not sneering at Podemos but I am a bit sceptical of the nature of this w/class participation - Iglesias seems to be centralising power around himself and the 'circles' don't have any structural power in the organisation.
 
People Before Profit is so much of a better name than TUSC or Left Unity. Just better branding, I know that's a small thing but I don't think it hurts.

It's a usefully soft name for vote gathering. Ironically, years ago the Irish SWP (then SWM) used to criticise the Workers Party for using People Before Profit as a slogan, because it puts a cross class "people" at the centre of its politics.

Very good performance by Carroll though. That must put him in line for an Assembly seat. The odd thing is that the SWP is tiny in Belfast. The vote they just got bears absolutely no relationship to their activist numbers in a city where they may well be the sixth or seventh biggest left group.
 
People Before Profit is so much of a better name than TUSC or Left Unity. Just better branding, I know that's a small thing but I don't think it hurts.
There's a party in Lewisham called "People Before Profit". In Deptford they went head-to-head against TUSC (represented by an ex-councillor). They got 666 votes (1.40%). TUSC got 286 (0.5%). In the two other Lewisham seats, "People Before Profit" stood in one, TUSC in the other. The one got 390 votes (0.91%), the other 391 (0.81%). I agree that "People Before Profit" is better than "TUSC". "People Not Profits" would be better, though.
 
Latest rationalisation from my local candidate as to why she didn't do well - "most of my supporters are asylum seekers, so aren't allowed to vote"
 
Back
Top Bottom