And I'm asking you how your model works. We both have the same goal. But if Britain underwent a revolution that entity would still exist because of borders and other ostensibly state mechanisms. The capitalist countries in the rest of the world would conspire to crush us. Under democratic working class control I see no reason why the state, untilsuch time as it withers, would be oppressive on anyone expcept capitalists seeking to regain power. Whether that's a federation of communes or a central bureacracy it's going to amount to the same thing. The state oppresses us now because of capitalism
You remind me of glitchhiker. He used to like derailing this thread in a very similar way and had the same sort of politics.. I think you're perfectly capable of finding out for yourself how the commune model works and are probably not genuinely interested in it, but simply want to run it down and apply your own cynicism. But hey, maybe I'm wrong, so I'll just leave you with this . . .
Throughout history there have occurred, when needed, structures of popular assemblies and workers councils (which is the same structure known as the commune - where the term communism originates). Popular assemblies are meetings of ordinary people which organise against the dominant hierarchical institutions (states, corporations, etc). Assemblies are non-hierarchical, with everyone having equal power instead of dividing the group into order takers and order givers. Libertarian communism is usually used to make decisions in the assemblies. These assemblies can be formed in the neighbourhoods, workplaces, villages, towns and cities. They typically use mandated & recallable delegates to coordinate their activities.
Mandated delegates simply implement the decisions of their assemblies, where decision making power stays, unlike representatives who can implement any decision they want once they gain power. The most famous systems of mandated & recallable delegates are the workers councils, which are confederations of worker assemblies. This structure of decentralized communism is the embryo of an anarchist society. An anarchist society would be organized by voluntary non-hierarchical associations, such as these assemblies & councils, rather than through authoritarian institutions like corporations and the state. These organs of workers self-organisation were usually short lived and disbanded within a few years or so. This is because these structures consisted of a majority of participants who were not anarchists and did not see these structures as the embryo of the future society, but we believe they can be - however it would require a working-class revolution for it to be achieved.