Bingoman
Well-Known Member
Yeah that's himdo you mean the fella with a life long stutter
Yeah that's himdo you mean the fella with a life long stutter
do you mean the fella with a life long stutter
he did say that I wasnt imaging it thenVice-president Trump now
and....it's goodnight from him
Gaining momentumOkay, he's now speaking up for unions!
I've changed my mind, the man is on top form. Go Joe!
And eventually they will have to do a goodnight from her.
If they think Kamala Harris is a good candidate, I have a bridge that I would like to sell them.
Thing is though (I recognise what you are saying) he seemed quite relaxed and down to earth. Thoughtful, competent, on his brief.Even if we exclude the most obvious gaffes with the wrong names, there were a number of times in that press conference where his train of thought or rhetoric trailed off and he just said 'anyway' and moved on.
Thing is that its reached the stage where perception is more important than the underlying reality, especially given that the press are now circling like vultures.Thing is though (I recognise what you are saying) he seemed quite relaxed and down to earth. Thoughtful, competent, on his brief.
If you think some very slick, younger more forceful speaker would be more likely to win, unfortunately I would definitely agree.
Whether he or she would be a 'better' president I don't know. I suspect not.
He's saying the polls aren't accurate or aren't reliable, though I don't know what the polls are saying. I assume then it doesn't look good.Thing is that its reached the stage where perception is more important than the underlying reality, especially given that the press are now circling like vultures.
I dont actually have a prediction about what the democrats will do, especially as I dont exactly rate them, but now things are even more of a circus than they usually are.
He's nearly tied or slightly ahead of Trump. Harris is polling even better. the dems got this, folks...He's saying the polls aren't accurate or aren't reliable, though I don't know what the polls are saying. I assume then it doesn't look good.
A few minor stumbles apart, he actually did pretty well, I thought. He answered all the questions with detail, was barely repetitive, was pretty darned staunch in defending his record and his workload. The only problem was...
That's a pretty low bar
He only sounded good when you thought "well, compared to how Trump would be answering"
You were still waiting with bated breath breadth every time he paused to see if he would pick up where he left off
Half the muttering of Biden not being up to it has to be Harris as VP would take over... hence the calls for an open primaryI think Harris could do it with Gavin Newsom on the ticket as her VP. A young, white, handsome male who can level things up in the minds of the idiots who constitute the American electorate who can't stomach the prospect of a black woman getting the job.
Biden just has to do the decent thing, and fast. This Nato summit is three gruelling days of him trying to be appear to be the most powerful person in the world. And he's clearly, clearly not up to it.
This is the problem though: clearly Biden is the better choice, as it stands. But Biden cannot function. Gaffe after gaffe. His performence after the debate at a rally was touted as a comeback, but it's just as bad. He sounds old and tired and people will see that. It's a gamble and can we risk running him given that, in the next debate, he could be as bad or worseBiden. Old but heart in the right place and surrounded by realtively normal people. Or Trump, a man who has vowed to end democracy and believes America literally has invisible planes, stares directly at an eclipse and believes that the noise from wind turbines, which he calls windmills, gives you cancer.
I'll take four (probably fewer) years of Biden than Trump any time. You get Biden, you plod on for a bit, you get Trump and the world is fucked for a very very long fucking time.
As was trump in 2016I honestly think Kamala would be less popular than Clinton in 2016.