(who will like all young people get more self-deluded as they age)
(who will like all young people get more self-deluded as they age)
Oh YES!!!! A Sparks reference on U75.I always wondered what Ron Mael from Sparks did as a youth. Now I know - he was a model for socialist realism artwork.![]()
Not that long, without votes. They need the votes, and they are haemorrhaging them.What about the really rich (esp. corporate) donors to the vermin? How long could they keep the Tory machine on life support?
Don't waste your time with this lot. Just console yourself with the thought that, even if Corbyn does win next time, he'll make such a major fuck of the economy (upon which all social services rely) that the Tories will win the following 5++ elections in a row.
The key point is, a majority of people under 59 voted Labour last time. If the Tories somehow spin this out for 4 years, that's a huge slice of their majority wiped out, and a big boost to Labour, purely courtesy of the grim reaper
Any evidence for this one? Although we are still waiting for the evidence you promised earlier, of course.Not much logic there. As people get older and wiser, they tend to vote Tory, so although some Tories may die off over the next few years, many more will take their place.
Any evidence for this one?
Oh dear, you really don't understand, do you?It's self evident. You may not have noticed, but the Tories have been around a long, long time but have still been the most popular political party at the last few elections.
It's self evident. You may not have noticed, but the Tories have been around a long, long time but have still been the most popular political party at the last few elections.
Those scholarly articles, they're a figment of your imagination aren't theyIt's self evident. You may not have noticed, but the Tories have been around a long, long time but have still been the most popular political party at the last few elections.
You're spot on regarding Corbyn.
However regarding wasting my time, I find more enjoyment in debating politics with those I disagree with than nodding heads with those with whom I agree. Obviously, unlike myself, many here obviously prefer the feeling of security that being in the company of the likeminded presumably gives them.
Many of the posters here are typical socialists who probably have no idea what JFK was on about when he urged people to ask what they could do for their country rather than ask what their country can do for them.
He was talking to his fellow Americans, not addressing people in Canada, Mexico, or the UK. Perhaps you should read the speech. You might learn something.You're spot on regarding Corbyn. However regarding wasting my time, I find more enjoyment in debating politics with those I disagree with than nodding heads with those with whom I agree. Obviously, unlike myself, many here obviously prefer the feeling of security that being in the company of the likeminded presumably gives them.
Many of the posters here are typical socialists who probably have no idea what JFK was on about when he urged people to ask what they could do for their country rather than ask what their country can do for them.
How the fuck would you know? You've just uncritically swallowed whole his completely unsubstantiated assertion. Is that how shit works among Tory lickspittles?
Sorry, but that's absolute nonsense.Not that long, without votes. They need the votes, and they are haemorrhaging them.
the best way to judge them then would be to hang them all and let them really be neck and neckSorry, but that's absolute nonsense.
This is their performance over the last 12 years. That is not haemorrhaging votes.
Year | % of vote | % of electorate
2005 32.4 19.9
2010 36.1 23.5
2015 36.8 24.4
2017 42.4 29.2
Neither does current polling (FWIW) show any haemorrhaging, a decline from the pre-election (probably overestimated) values they had, but the general picture is the Tories and Labour pretty much neck and neck.
I'd love to agree with you, but by the time the next election comes around they will be nearly 190 years old as a recognizable political party and they have spent most of that time both being consistently wrong and consistently winning elections. They aren't going to die off, they aren't going to be crushed by the youth (who will like all young people get more self-deluded as they age) and they will find a way to "fix" the housing crisis that results in them benefiting the most.
What about the really rich (esp. corporate) donors to the vermin? How long could they keep the Tory machine on life support?
Sorry, but that's absolute nonsense.
This is their performance over the last 12 years. That is not haemorrhaging votes.
Year | % of vote | % of electorate
2005 32.4 19.9
2010 36.1 23.5
2015 36.8 24.4
2017 42.4 29.2
Neither does current polling (FWIW) show any haemorrhaging, a decline from the pre-election (probably overestimated) values they had, but the general picture is the Tories and Labour pretty much neck and neck.
Not much logic there. As people get older and wiser, they tend to vote Tory, so although some Tories may die off over the next few years, many more will take their place.
Corbyn was very good during the last election in persuading the young and gullible to vote for him. His vague comments about student loans in the lead up to the last election brought him a shit load of votes, only for him to backtrack on what he'd said, after the votes were counted. No doubt he will use the same tactics before the next election. Everyone likes a free lunch. Many of those who vote for him are more interested in immediate reward for themselves rather than the long term stability of our economy.
If you mean the average of a member of the Tory party is 72 then killer b showed that that figure is pretty dubious here. 57 is a more likely number.How much of that 29% of the electorate are pensioners though?
The average age of the Tory Party is 72.
And yet they've increased both their share of the vote and the share of the electorate at the last three elections.Their support amongst the under 35s is 27%. Their support amongst the under 45s is 33%. This is a worse generation gap than they have ever had.
And demographics where going to kill them off in the 00s, just as demographics where going to mean that the Republicans would never win another presidential election. Not only is this argument utterly ignorant of the past but it ignores that people change and respond to material conditions.The sheer size of the baby boomer generation, whose firm support was won largely through them profiting from home ownership, has served to conceal how fucked the Tories really are and they are only just starting to realise it now.
This isn't true. Estimates vary (they don't publish figures) but most surveys put it at 57 (four years older than the average Labour member)The average age of the Tory Party is 72.
Anyone here remember the Tory party?, They were quite a big thing until they died in 1997.
It's historical left parties dying isn't it, in this period, rather than right ones.
Aren't all the traditional parties dying? The left parties just have fewer life-support systems to prolong their demise.
Aren't all the traditional parties dying? The left parties just have fewer life-support systems to prolong their demise.
The average age of the Tory Party is 72.