ruffneck23
front left
ta
You might be right, I seem to recall Thatcher taunting Neil Kinnock that he was 'frit' about the coming election (87?) and that would have happened this time round too. Still, there's a chance Labour might emerge from in an election in 2020 better than we know they will emerge from this one. Also, as Raheem said, an election now strengthens May within her own party.Once it was called, I don't see that he had a choice.
There won't be a 2020 now tho will there? And if they lose heavily Corbyn isn't going to be able to hang around long enough for the next one!Labour made the decision to vote for the election in the knowledge that they will lose it (and lose heavily). Voting against it probably wasn't a good look, but was the best option. One scenario is that brexit negotiations go badly and Labour do a bit better in 2020. The other and probably more likely scenario is that negotiations go badly but people back the Tories as some kind of crisis/wartime/nationalistic logic. That means there's a good chance Labour do even worse in 2020. Same time, set against knowing they will do very badly in 2017, leaving the election till 2020 was probably the best way to go.
I'll admit, it was an almost impossible choice for Corbyn - and I may even have said something different myself at the time of the vote. But ultimately 2017 is a turkeys/Christmas thing.
I have a feeling those in nailed on safe seats would have backed itPlenty of Labour MPs eager for the defeat and the end of Corbyn would perhaps have backed the election call even if Corbyn had tried to block it...
We say "weak" nowadays, Uncle Aleister.
Who's "we" Is that like a royal we or do you have something like a gang?
Or are you really just a jumped up butt-plug with aspirations of becoming a decent human being? Curl up and hibernate you twat.
I'm started to get the feeling the leak might have come from the leadership. They've given the impression of being sort of prepared in their response to it, whereas the Labour right seem caught off guard. Then Ian McKellen is on the TV declaring his support, now Chomsky it seems. To borrow and flip the Progress WWII analogy, has Corbyn planned this as his D-Day?
Far be it from me to come to the defense of Pickman, but the word he used, i.e. feeble is hardly archaic."We" is "anyone under the age of 85",
Fantasising about anal pleasure again?
bestiality-boy.
How very...revealing.
it almost seems to good to be true
Labour's list is just getting a bit 'everything that people like':
"What about giving everybody one of those old nokkia phones that have made a come back?"
"Piers Morgan to be horsewhipped every Thursday"
"Erm, what about, ermm, Wagon Wheels? Yeah, something about Wagon Wheels..."
Even wor Polly likes the manifesto, spending 2/3 of her article saying so before business as normal is resumed and she says Corbyn should be taken out and shot:
Never mind who leaked it, this Labour manifesto is a cornucopia of delights | Polly Toynbee
I dread to google.As much as I'm loathed to say it Richard Littlejohn had her pegged all those years ago.
My question was, if you were going to make a film about British politics, who would you get to play Theresa May.Before I get asked: Tom Pride.
My question was, if you were going to make a film about British politics, who would you get to play Theresa May.
I dread to google.
Tom Pride apparentlyWhassername? Miranda.
Grand Old Duke of Islington - he marched them (the 500,000) up to the top of the hill and he marched them down again.which leaves me wondering just what the point of the Corbyn leadership really was, except to have a totemic old left figurehead.
"Remember us." As simple an order asI've been wondering for a while about what Corbyn's legacy as Labour leader might be.
Una StubbsMy question was, if you were going to make a film about British politics, who would you get to play Theresa May.