19force8
For the avoidance of faith
You only get busy after they arrive.George too busy with twins on the way.
And I don't think George will have too many sleepless nights.
You only get busy after they arrive.George too busy with twins on the way.
(my own conversations with Labour activists suggest a similar view (or worse) is fairly widespread among those who were previously sympathetic, except among the most messianic of the momentum lot)
I think "disaster" is too strong a word, its just that the scale of what he has to do (appeal to the country, win the next election, reform the party, deal with the malcontents) is beyond him - though it would probably be beyond anyone. Things like Danczuk still not being dealt with (for that texting or his expenses claims) by the party is a terrible sign.
A good summary, but in terms of TM, will it last?
Yes NO ONE will lead them to glorious victoryRound here, Momentum could be referred to as "previously-messianic", even though (as you said in the post previous to this) they can't name a deserving alternative for their zealous affections.
Yes NO ONE will lead them to glorious victory
All hail NO ONE
no man has blinded meYes NO ONE will lead them to glorious victory
All hail NO ONE
Cometh the hour...
...cometh Tim Farron, all down your trouser leg.
I'd have Tom Hardy in his James Delaney role .Big old boots up on the Front Bench, bit of bone dust , smoke and African magik, just staring at May and the Cabinet before beckoning the Deputy Leader, " Watson, I have a use for you" .Don't know if this link has already been posted on this thread, but Michael Rosen is fairly cogent on why a "capable left wing leader" would be no different to Corbyn:
Michael Rosen: George Clooney wrong man to lead the Labour Party
Oh God, mind bleach....cometh Tim Farron, all down your trouser leg.
Oh God, mind bleach.
Oh God, mind bleach.
I should hope so.Apologies.
AgreedCorbyn is therefore the only chance of getting rid of the Tories now
Well, in practice, he is a drag on the party, I agree - though I suspect I'm agreeing with you from a different political position. But then the party has also been a drag on his leadership - the coups and briefings ensured he never had a chance, nor, more to the point did the attempt to restore the party to a social democratic position. But equally, more so in fact, I blame the Corbynites for never building that project, engaging with people. It was always going to be difficult, to change direction, to get people feeling they had a connection with the party - but it was never going to happen if they didn't actually do it. But all that adds up to, well, nothing. There's no realistic prospect of any kind of even semi successful political project emerging from the ruins. A united social democratic party would have more chance - even a united fucking Blairite party would have more chance in the polls than what there is now - but neither of those things is going to happen - so removing Corbyn does nothing.So what though?Corbyn is a massive drag on Labour and therefore the only chance of getting rid of the Tories now
My guess is that if Corbyn hadn't found his way onto the ballot paper and Burnham or Cooper had won they'd be a couple of points higher in the polls, almost entirely on the grounds of being a more united party (than now), but still out of the game. They'd also have 100,000 + less members. Labour councils would still be cutting jobs and services and we'd all be equally depressed.I must say that I despise the PLP for their determination to change the Labour Party into the UUK equivilent of the Democrats. In fact, I am losing all sympathy for, if not empathy with, my fellow Labour supporters. Fuck it. Go crowbar in Dan Javis or some other "non-Corbynite" and watch the front bench of the opposition fill up with the likes of Rachel "tougher on benefis than the Tories" Reeves and Hillary "bomber" Benn. The only hope now is the SNP and a Scottish address.
While I often find myself... frustrated by the same issue, I think it's worth bearing in mind that this is happening for structural reasons rather than a mass failure on the part of the Corbynites. It was just never going to happen. The monolith of the party & establishment was too strong, and the organisation of the labour left too weak - and all the while they've been trying to deal with the biggest political challenges the party has faced since the war.But equally, more so in fact, I blame the Corbynites for never building that project, engaging with people. It was always going to be difficult, to change direction, to get people feeling they had a connection with the party - but it was never going to happen if they didn't actually do it.
Well, I sort of agree - and you must be right because that's exactly what's happened. But I still wonder what the fuck the Corbynites thought the job in hand was - 'say social democratic things and watch the voters flood back'? And yes, okay, it goes back to the circumstances under which he was elected - totally unexpected and without any serious plans, structures or policies. The extent to which the Blairite takeover was organised can at times be over-exaggerated, but it really did have a plan, money and a longstanding body of work to draw on from the eurocommunists through to the business friendly think tanks. But still, and I'm left with a 'but still...', all those new members... all the money that came with them... the possibility of something happening. Corbynism isn't even to my political taste, but it's been galling watching it getting precisely nowhere.While I often find myself... frustrated by the same issue, I think it's worth bearing in mind that this is happening for structural reasons rather than a mass failure on the part of the Corbynites. It was just never going to happen. The monolith of the party & establishment was too strong, and the organisation of the labour left too weak - and all the while they've been trying to deal with the biggest political challenges the party has faced since the war.
Vinegar stroke - but organic balsamic.Crikey, we could create a whole thread out of this fella.
How did you not type orgasmic balsamic ?Vinegar stroke - but organic balsamic.
Hit the post.How did you not type orgasmic balsamic ?
I think the thing is that to achieve that (and I'm not sure how much social democracy really is or was the aim of Corbynists) requires a political logic that must today surely point away from the Labour Party - needing a view of what is necessary for rebuilding a foundation for that politics that is antagonistic to the needs/demands of parliamentarism and of Labourism. Arguably it even points beyond social democracy itself, but that aside, I think it would have been pretty much impossible for a movement in the orbit of Labour to make that shift. Their politics exhausted itself decades ago and its roots have withered away.Well, I sort of agree - and you must be right because that's exactly what's happened. But I still wonder what the fuck the Corbynites thought the job in hand was - 'say social democratic things and watch the voters flood back'? And yes, okay, it goes back to the circumstances under which he was elected - totally unexpected and without any serious plans, structures or policies. The extent to which the Blairite takeover was organised can at times be over-exaggerated, but it really did have a plan, money and a longstanding body of work to draw on from the eurocommunists through to the business friendly think tanks. But still, and I'm left with a 'but still...', all those new members... all the money that came with them... the possibility of something happening. Corbynism isn't even to my political taste, but it's been galling watching it getting precisely nowhere.
That's it really. My paradoxical posts on this thread have been variants on 'loads of people joined, wanted to do social democracy but even within their own logic, they've failed'. But I'm not into electoral politics and the real lost moment I saw in Corbynism was a brief time when the expanded membership could have looked outwards, engaged with communities - and in doing that started to unravel the assumptions and communication channels of labourism, along with breaching the structures of the party itself. Fwiw, even that wouldn't have been in line with my anti-system politics, but it would have been interesting. It was probably an unrealistic notion that a largely middle class membership could get back into working class communities - a membership also that hasn't discovered that social democracy isn't there to be had any more. But even after saying all that it's disappointing that they've done nothing at all, give or take fighting what has become a pointless struggle to plot some route or other through the arcane systems of CLPs and rulebooks (and haven't, as far as I can tell, achieved much through that pathway either)/I think the thing is that to achieve that (and I'm not sure how much social democracy really is or was the aim of Corbynists) requires a political logic that must today surely point away from the Labour Party - needing a view of what is necessary for rebuilding a foundation for that politics that is antagonistic to the needs/demands of parliamentarism and of Labourism. Arguably it even points beyond social democracy itself, but that aside, I think it would have been pretty much impossible for a movement in the orbit of Labour to make that shift. Their politics exhausted itself decades ago and its roots have withered away.