Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Jeremy Corbyn's time is up

Half the problem there is selecting "Corbynite" candidates, who as you and Bush state go on to get shot down and who come from a small talent pool anyway.

They should really be looking to get in people who have considerable experience / achievements outside of politics, which would present much more of a danger to the current PLP (and by extension, to a Tory Party that is increasingly dominated by the same sort of political obsessive), be less of a threat to the current leadership (at least in terms of not making every selection contest a war that they lose), have a better chance of winning by-elections and gradually improve the quality of debate in the Commons (and further down the line the quality of minister).

Tricky. I'm not sure that Shami Chakrabarti's performance in her role suggests this would be a rip-roaring success for MP candidates. Success and achievement is also pretty likely to = establishment.
 
Half the problem there is selecting "Corbynite" candidates, who as you and Bush state go on to get shot down and who come from a small talent pool anyway.

They should really be looking to get in people who have considerable experience / achievements outside of politics, which would present much more of a danger to the current PLP (and by extension, to a Tory Party that is increasingly dominated by the same sort of political obsessive), be less of a threat to the current leadership (at least in terms of not making every selection contest a war that they lose), have a better chance of winning by-elections and gradually improve the quality of debate in the Commons (and further down the line the quality of minister).
Parachute in candidates with little connection to the local area and party activists you mean? Don't think that's really on the cards right now.
 
Parachute in candidates with little connection to the local area and party activists you mean? Don't think that's really on the cards right now.

I meant directing local parties to look at, and ideally select, people based on their achievements outside politics.
 
she doesn't appear to have been damaged by the problems within the NHS - which have been very serious around here with the minor injuries units closed to get staff into the A&E, and lots of bad news from the A&E which features regularly in the local media - the national polling suggests that Labour simply isn't trusted to do any better, and from the doorstep i'd agree with the polling.

my personal suspicion is that the friction of events will wear down the tory lead, and that fewer voters will say they like her, but i don't see Corbyns ratings improving much even if Labour starts grazing the 30/33% mark. my view that that almost regardless of what happens between now and 2020 and who peple say they will vote for, voters will walk into the polling booth and decide on than Corbyn or May - and i know who they'll choose...


Simon Stevens(NHS Boss, former US healthcare exec) is going to make major announcements/changes, on Friday, the STP plans will mean lots of A/E closures, hospital wards, etc.
 
Tricky. I'm not sure that Shami Chakrabarti's performance in her role suggests this would be a rip-roaring success for MP candidates. Success and achievement is also pretty likely to = establishment.
Bearing the above article in mind are you still sticking by your ridiculous claim that if/when Corbyn goes the party can move to the left?
 
I meant directing local parties to look at, and ideally select, people based on their achievements outside politics.
Like having founded a hostel for homeless veterans, or being a doctor or something? Half of the Gorton shortlist were social workers with years at the coalface... There's plenty of people with real world achievements ending up on the shortlists (which are drawn up by the NEC rather than the local party anyway) - but unsurprisingly, the nomination will go to whoever organises best. That tends to favour activists, trade unionists and councillors with networks and support in the local party & unions rather than tenuously connected 'achievers'.
 
Kier Starmer now looking like the great hope of the labour rightwing. The likes of Toynbee are having fevered dreams of him leading an anti-brexit, urban-liberal-friendly party.
 
Bearing the above article in mind are you still sticking by your ridiculous claim that if/when Corbyn goes the party can move to the left?

What I meant was that he was preventing the left gaining ground by making it look utterly unattractive to everyone but keyboard warriors like yourself.

Imagine what a capable left wing leader could achieve with that level of membership support? But, sorry, I forgot. Everything is shit, nothing can improve and the Labour Party is full of ungovernable muppets.
 
So now you're no longer claiming that Corbyn's resignation will result in a move to the left, i.e. you were talking cobblers from start to finish.
 
So now you're no longer claiming that Corbyn's resignation will result in a move to the left, i.e. you were talking cobblers from start to finish.

Quote me where I wrote that. IIRC I wrote he was holding its advancement up, not a move further to the left. Nor was that a prediction of what would happen, because that would depend on who took over.

Do you think Jeremy is really delivering a move to the left or just offering the hope of one?
 
upload_2017-3-29_15-27-4-png.103125


_52063837_008710420-1.jpg
 
What I meant was that he was preventing the left gaining ground by making it look utterly unattractive to everyone but keyboard warriors like yourself.

Imagine what a capable left wing leader could achieve with that level of membership support? But, sorry, I forgot. Everything is shit, nothing can improve and the Labour Party is full of ungovernable muppets.
Don't know if this link has already been posted on this thread, but Michael Rosen is fairly cogent on why a "capable left wing leader" would be no different to Corbyn:

Michael Rosen: George Clooney wrong man to lead the Labour Party
 
Back
Top Bottom