Mason has always appeared a bit biased
Mason has always appeared a bit biased
You don't have a single original thought in your head.Corbyn has to go. Labour are unelectable with him at the helm. I don't doubt his principles, but his leadership is weak and crumbling. Rapidly losing support and confidence of his MPs. Slow off the mark for remain, he could barely hide his real opinion for wanting to be out of the EU. Lost many voters to ukip and brexit in recent times in traditional labour heartlands. Time's up, jezza. No idea who an ideal replacement could be, but as mentioned earlier , if labour can't capitalise from an increasingly fractured Tory , then they're fucked for a long while.
You might as well say what Hodgson needs to do now is to get england to win all their remaining games in the euros. It's content free.Plenty of people have switched allegiances to ukip from labour and the Tory's.
You love jezza, we get it
He's on borrowed Time, I'm sorry to tell you.
Labour should now regroup around a plausible future leader who can capitalise on a fractured Tory party, if they can't now , it will be another long wait.
Tripe and tropes.Jezza, principled man with convictions, living in a bygone socialist era and with little leadership skills or control or confidence of his cabinet as they are pushed or jumped.
What should he do? Do you think he can assemble a SC and win a GE with a clear majority?
It's always difficult when many here support corbyn and in some fantastical world believe he is a strong leader that can you unite his party and bring back ex voters. Because what is happening here and in the referendum is not the case. He did ok in the recent elections, and that allowed him to survive a little longer.
A new leader is needed to prevent damage limitation.
No I'm not a blairite. Corbyn would have done well in the past industrial era, and I support his strong convictions and ideology , but that alone cannot win elections, that alone cannot bring back ex voters .Like who? Lemme guess, some Blairite twunt?
Well say who, say why they are credible as leader, why they would do better than corbyn (where, why and how again please) and the method by which they become leader. Please say something substantive.It's always difficult when many here support corbyn and in some fantastical world believe he is a strong leader that can you unite his party and bring back ex voters. Because what is happening here and in the referendum is not the case. He did ok in the recent elections, and that allowed him to survive a little longer.
A new leader is needed to prevent damage limitation.
Read my posts then. I named several possibilities who I believe to be front runners, and I would support Burnham to be the ideal candidate to bring back ex voters , which is the key.Well say who, say why they are credible as leader, why they do better than corbyn and the method by which they become leader. Please say something substantive.
No I'm not a blairite. Corbyn would have done well in the past industrial era, and I support his strong convictions and ideology , but that alone cannot win elections, that alone cannot bring back ex voters .
I don't have a solution, but the party need to regroup as time is now to capitalise on a fractured Tory party.
No, you named people who might decide to be candidates - nothing else. Nothing to answer a single one of the questions i just put to you.Read my posts then. I named several possibilities who I believe to be front runners, and I would support Burnham to be the ideal candidate to bring back ex voters , which is the key.
Well it's not something we can choose. There's likely to be a vote of no confidence , I expect more resignation, and corbyn to leave at some point honourably rather than face a leadership contest.Having yet another leadership contest doesn't strike me as a good way to capitalise on Tory infighting.
Well it's not something we can choose. There's likely to be a vote of no confidence , I expect more resignation, and corbyn to leave at some point honourably rather than face a leadership contest.
this political class really are a bunch of self serving cunts arent they
Well it's not something we can choose. There's likely to be a vote of no confidence , I expect more resignation, and corbyn to leave at some point honourably rather than face a leadership contest.
Read my posts then. I named several possibilities who I believe to be front runners, and I would support Burnham to be the ideal candidate to bring back ex voters , which is the key.
Burnham was a weak candidate when he stood last, he stands for nothing, a Burnham leadership would guarantee a tory win in 2020.Read my posts then. I named several possibilities who I believe to be front runners, and I would support Burnham to be the ideal candidate to bring back ex voters , which is the key.
Well say who, say why they are credible as leader, why they would do better than corbyn (where, why and how again please) and the method by which they become leader. Please say something substantive.
If you have no answer to these questions you're not actually saying anything at all.
AFAIK, Corbyn's name is automatically included on the ballot. No nominations required.Just to re affirm this, cos you tend to know, but we sure that Corbyn needs PLP backers, as incumbent, to get on the ticket if ( when ) there's a leadership challenge ?