Not quimmyCunxit
Sure he could have gone to Pride - but perhaps there is something else going on that he should have got involved in?
Tbh it's more of a cellar floor of skeletonsHas Chuka's mystery closet of skeletons been dealt with yet?
Should never miss an opportunity to tell him to piss off though.He isn't in the cabinet.
Jezza doing such a great job
'Leaked internal Labour party polling of people who voted for Labour in 2015 reveals that nearly a third (29%) would support a different party if a general election was held today.' (guardian)
The only Scottish Labour MP. The only one. Is resigning as Shadow Scottish Secretary. This means that as well as being 3rd place at Holyrood, they'll be forced to use either a peer or an MP for an English constituency as Shadow Scot Sec just at the moment the party in Scotland looks like it's split over independence (several big names making favourable noises or at least acknowledging that a lot of theLabour No vote has fled to Yes over the EU result).
Not sure how true this is, but;
"David Milliband to be given Jo Cox's vacant seat so he can stand against Corbyn... how low will the Blaireites stoop?"
It couldn't come at a worse time for Labour Unionism: if the indyref2 No campaign is by default a Tory affair, then Yes is in a far stronger position: a Tory /non-Tory polarisation of the Indy question is exactly what Yes needs.Well it's not like there is anything Labour can really do to strengthen support in Scotland at this point. It's just gone, regardless of what does or doesn't happen within Labour
Maybe they could rally round an elder statesman of the moral calibre and punching power of, I don't know... Jack Straw?On the Guardian front page. "Hilary Benn sacked and others resign".
Others? Post truth eh?
Not sure how true this is, but;
"David Milliband to be given Jo Cox's vacant seat so he can stand against Corbyn... how low will the Blaireites stoop?"
Who are you quoting
I didn't say he should hide away - quite the opposite.
Sure he could have gone to Pride - but perhaps there is something else going on that he should have got involved in?
So he should have gone to Pride, where the set up was planned to take place. That being the case the press, sympathetic as they are to Corbyn, would have reported it. Meanwhile his speech on the need to protect workers rights, oppose the threatened continuation of austerity and expose the dangerous lies of the rexiteers goes unreported. Do you think that might have happened?
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
Not sure Pride was the best use of his time yesterday tbh - and don't bother claiming he would have been labelled a homophobe for articulating Labour's vision of a Brexit and urging a general election instead.
Are you aware that swathes of voting intention polls come out every month? Labour aren't doing too bad in them - better than they actually did in the actual 2015 general election. If it is a fact that 29% of Labour voters have jumped ship then evidently they've already been replaced by non-Labour voters who would now vote Labour if a general election was held tomorrow. That's literally what the voting intention polls are telling us.
Not sure how true this is, but;
"David Milliband to be given Jo Cox's vacant seat so he can stand against Corbyn... how low will the Blaireites stoop?"
Surely only if the locals select him as a candidate, but TBH I would not be shocked by such serpentile behaviour these days.