Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is this woman a transphobe?

I just arrived and just being me. I saw this topic and added my views to it. But i am losing interest now. If you want to talk about it. Please be less insulting i might reply again at some point
 
I just arrived and just being me. I saw this topic and added my views to it. But i am losing interest now. If you want to talk about it. Please be less insulting i might reply again at some point

You just arrived, and you just happened to see this thread, which hadn't been posted on since November last year, so you just thought you'd add your "views" to it.

And you're just being you...
 
i wish this wasn't so
Me too. Because it's meant that we've abandoned respectful disagreement between people who are, by and large, politically sound. And, insofar as there's any public discourse, that void has been largely filled by extremists. But, if it was causing pain to (and the loss of) established members of this community - on all 'sides' of the debate - maybe it's for the best. Especially as, to be honest, we'd reached a position of going round in circles, and taking past one another.
 
hmm was not sure where to put this when i saw it this might work


p5412ygj8hd91.jpg
Fuck off.
 
oh good, is it post the most insane nasty old shit you've ever seen on a barrel-scraping trash website and have been saving on your desktop for just such an occasion time?

This is better check these out.
 
oh good, is it post the most insane nasty old shit you've ever seen on a barrel-scraping trash website and have been saving on your desktop for just such an occasion time?

This is better check these out.

Gummy squirrel. :cool:
 
oh good, is it post the most insane nasty old shit you've ever seen on a barrel-scraping trash website and have been saving on your desktop for just such an occasion time?

This is better check these out.


I love the words abyssal and megafauna.
 
Truss as Equality minister under Johnson fills the EHRC with those sympathetic to the government, leading to a number of resignations in the EHRC. EHRC then 'recommends' to Badenoch changes to the Equality Act that effectively will render the Gender Recognition Act as useless.

Even if its full of barriers to actually implement any change, looks like people are getting what they want despite the chorus of 'we dont want to repeal the GRA, just asking questions..'. Thanks then.
 
Truss as Equality minister under Johnson fills the EHRC with those sympathetic to the government, leading to a number of resignations in the EHRC. EHRC then 'recommends' to Badenoch changes to the Equality Act that effectively will render the Gender Recognition Act as useless.

Even if its full of barriers to actually implement any change, looks like people are getting what they want despite the chorus of 'we dont want to repeal the GRA, just asking questions..'. Thanks then.

From a policy perspective this is a total mess. It seems to be based on the EHRC's newly discovered belief that only trans people with a GRC benefit from Equality Act protections. But that's not what the act says, it's not what the courts have found, and it's not what the EHRC used to say until Falkner and the gang of terfs took over. I don't know whether they really believe this, or hope that for some reason any future case may fall on their side, but trans people without a GRC are already going round using single sex spaces so the proposed change will make little difference. And even if it does than it will only take one court verdict to throw things into chaos. It either needs a Supreme Court decision in their favour or total rewrite of the Equality Act to be in any way robust.

From a culture war and electioneering perspective however it makes perfect sense. It's probably not a vote winner but it's not a vote loser either. It keeps Labour on the backfoot, increases the risk of a internal Labour splits on the issue and allows loads of election airtime to be taken up with this instead of the fact people can't afford to heat their homes and food prices double every fortnight. It also pacifies the segment of commentariat who are obsessed with trans people who will now devote their energies to attacking any Labour politicians remotely supportive of trans rights. If it's a mess policy-wise it doesn't matter, in the unlikely event they win the next election they can worry about that then.

The biggest worry I think is they try bodge something through quickly with secondary legislation before the election. And that's going to be fucking horrible because there's no way they can really force businesses to discriminate against trans people without significant change to the law but the GCs will think that's the case. It's likely to result in trench warfare as GCs escalate attacks on any business or organisation which has trans inclusive policies, whilst trans people attack those that don't (which I suspect won't be many because who needs the hassle of forcing staff to guess someone's chromosones).

One option is businesses where possible just do away with changing rooms and public toilets when they aren't legally obliged to provide them. Another is to make everything gender neutral, which may well be the most robust legal position under any bodged law change. More worrying though is it's also likely to vastly increase abuse of gender nonconforming people in single sex spaces as every fucking terf turns into a gender cop and starts harrassing anyone they think doesn't look womanly enough to be in the women's toilets. And there's been plenty of gender critical and far right men recently threatening violence with this in mind.
 
Also should add that whilst these proposed changes are aimed at trans woman they will prove equally if not more devastating for trans men. Under what's proposed by EHRC if a business decides to exclude trans women from women's spaces then they will be pretty legally vulnerable if they don't also exclude trans men from men's spaces. Otherwise they may risk a sex discrimination claim, somewhat ironically from a trans woman on the basis she is a man who is being treated differently from a woman (who's actually a trans man). Sex discrimination cuts both ways in law and remove the proportionate and legitimate clause and instead permit a blanket ban then it will have to apply equally to both trans women and trans men.

So trans men will have to use women's toilets where they are likely to face harrassment and abuse and trans woman will have to use men's toilets where they will face the risk of sexual assault and violence. The end result if widely adopted will be the elimination of trans people's access to large parts of social and civic society - something we all fucking told you was the aim of the gender critical movement. And it will not end there, it will escalate as we are seeing in the US.
 
Back
Top Bottom