Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is this woman a transphobe?

A while back the Guardian US published an open letter criticising Freeman.

Edit: I'll find the letter when I get to my laptop. It's not a secret that evangelicals are exploiting the British terfs in the mainstream media.
 
I will just observe that the debate has become needlessly vitriolic. On the face of things there is very little to argue about - a plurality of people in UK polls support self-identification and use of toilet facilities aligned with that. But there just hasn't been a discussion about how society uses language around gender. Government should be having these discussions and should be arranging citizens' assemblies to find a way through, but instead it is shamefully exploiting the whole thing as a wedge issue. This has I feel led to people feeling that definitions have been foisted on them by unaccountable entities - and this is creating anger. This has been compounded by some very clumsy use of language (e.g. 'menstruators', 'womb-havers') - supposedly to be more precise about language for (amongst other things) medical reasons - but I see no reason for e.g. smear tests why you couldn't just say 'women and trans men'.
There was a very good thread on Twitter the other day from a trans woman reiterating that trans people have never 'demanded' the removal of the word 'woman' or 'mother' etc, but they have asked could medical language reflect that some people who aren't women might need smear tests etc and make sure they get the check ups and treatment they need, and she specifically said this is fine in fact best to be 'women and people with cervixes' etc so it includes everyone.
 
A while back the Guardian US published an open letter criticising Freeman.
Is that sentence your evidence for your allegation that she is funded by American evangelical xtians?
i mean, if thats all you've got i'll stop asking.

There is a real & interesting thing here, somewhere nearby, about how the worst people in the world (evangelicals, right wing extremists, the Republican Party, the Polish government, 'traditional family' promoters and all the many assorted dregs of that kind are absolutely loving this, as a wedge issue, and will leverage the hell out of it. And at the same time it is a real - and eternal - problem that some people will turn a blind eye to and even pal up with the absolute worst shitheads just because they think they are aligned on one thing.
That's what actually scares me, the leverage that is being wrung from this by properly dangerous people.


As an aside, not quite an illustration, check this out, Alex Jones just met Graham Lineham on a lesbian dating app.
 
Last edited:
A while back the Guardian US published an open letter criticising Freeman.

Edit: I'll find the letter when I get to my laptop. It's not a secret that evangelicals are exploiting the British terfs in the mainstream media.
Just out of interest, why do you think all these left wing radfem terfs are being exploited? Why haven't they noticed? Or could it just be that they disagree with you?
 
All I was doing was pointing out that the polling on this issue is not straightforward. Even if it was, either way, it still wouldn't say who was right, just what most, or a plurality, of people thought.
No, polling doesn't tell you which side is right and which wrong. But in this case, I think it does undermine some key claims and arguments of the gencrit lobby.

Namely:

That a more traditional view of sex and gender represents self-evident common sense. If that were so, you would expect a healthy majority of the public to subscribe to that view, but they appear not to.

That we are being steamrollered into accepting trans rights by men who refuse to listen to the views of women. How can this make sense when most women support trans rights, and are much more likely to do so than men?
 
That we are being steamrollered into accepting trans rights by men who refuse to listen to the views of women.
I guess they'd point to the fact that pre-op trans women have access to women's changing rooms despite the fact that (as the poll shows) most women don't want that.
 
Last edited:
Is that sentence your evidence for your allegation that she is funded by American evangelical xtians?
i mean, if thats all you've got i'll stop asking.

There is a real & interesting thing here, somewhere nearby, about how the worst people in the world (evangelicals, right wing extremists, the Republican Party, the Polish government, 'traditional family' promoters and all the many assorted dregs of that kind are absolutely loving this, as a wedge issue, and will leverage the hell out of it. And at the same time it is a real - and eternal - problem that some people will turn a blind eye to and even pal up with the absolute worst shitheads just because they think they are aligned on one thing.
That's what actually scares me, the leverage that is being wrung from this by properly dangerous people.


As an aside, not quite an illustration, check this out, Alex Jones just met Graham Lineham on a lesbian dating app.


Lineham's behaviour on that app is really one of the lowest points of this debate. It's an app which openly welcomes queer, trans and non binary people, some of the people he has outed to his thousands of readers said in their profile they were not out in their everyday lives. He has no idea where they live or what their circumstances are, he could cause real damage to someone doing shit like this, just because they had a profile on a queer dating app, and he, a straight man, doesn't like it.
 
I guess they'd point to the fact that pre-op trans women have access to women's changing rooms despite the fact that (as the poll shows) most women don't want that.
They'd be missing the point. This hasn't happened because it represents the views of men and those of women have been ignored. Across the board, men are less supportive of trans rights than women.

(As an aside, though, I think there are likely methodological problems with those "what about pre-ops" questions. Repeating a question and providing more information the second time may seem to some people like an invitation to reconsider. It also puts responses unnecessarily on a scale, and so introduces a potential end-aversion bias - people avoid putting themselves on one end or another of a scale. Moreover, allowing post-op trans women, but not pre-op trans women, to use the women's loos is in reality impracticable. So the survey leaves us unsure as what women's attitudes would be wrt real world policy. Would those women who support post-op wees but not pre-op wees, given that the question is not really divisible in that way, tend to prefer on balance a come one come all policy, or would they prefer to exclude all trans women? We don't know, because the question wasn't asked.)
 
As an aside, not quite an illustration, check this out, Alex Jones just met Graham Lineham on a lesbian dating app.

Do we think this is actually Linehan? I'm not sure it passes the basic test of looking like him. What am I missing?
 
Last edited:
I guess they'd point to the fact that pre-op trans women have access to women's changing rooms despite the fact that (as the poll shows) most women don't want that.
The poll shows that nearly 30% of women polled don't know whether pre-op trans women should have access to women's changing rooms. I'd say you're on pretty dodgy ground talking about what 'most women' want based on a 900 person poll in which almost 1/3 say they don't know. I'd also say that framing your post in that way is slightly disingenuous.
 
Do we think this is actually Linehan? I'm not sure it passes the basic test of looking like him. What am I missing?
It’s definitely him as he’s boasted about it and posted those pics himself on his shitty blog. As to whether the clip itself is genuine and not just edited slyly, I dunno, but the fact that Jones has gone to the bother of videoing printed out photos from the internet instead of displaying them digitally and has also not bothered to format them so they end up spreading over two pages - well, it strongly suggests it’s either genuine fucking old man idiocy or an extremely well thought out troll/joke
 
It’s definitely him as he’s boasted about it and posted those pics himself.
As to whether the clip itself is genuine and not just edited slyly, I dunno, but the fact that he’s printed out photos from the internet and not bothered to format them so they end up spreading over two pages strongly suggests it’s either genuine or an extremely well thought out troll/joke
I wonder if they got the pics from Linehan's "research" and just didn't know/care that one of them was the daring investigative journalist himself.
 
The poll shows that nearly 30% of women polled don't know whether pre-op trans women should have access to women's changing rooms. I'd say you're on pretty dodgy ground talking about what 'most women' want based on a 900 person poll in which almost 1/3 say they don't know. I'd also say that framing your post in that way is slightly disingenuous.
The poll shows there's not majority support amongst women for pre-op trans women's access to female changing rooms (and a plurality that's actively against it). As to the sample size, 900 seems reasonable, and I note that the objection wasn't raised to counter earlier claims that it demonstrates women's trans inclusivity.
 
Last edited:
So if trans people shouldn't stand for elected positions and shouldn't take part in sports etc what are they supposed to do then? It honestly seems to me that some people want them to be pushed out of anything 'visible' whatsoever
It needs more people who are trans, presenting programs on the Television, especially the BBC. For cis people it is quite a culture shock to see trans people. It will take quite a time for it to be seen as "normal". Celebrations such as pride are certainly working. Gay people are now almost totally accepted. Trans is much more difficult to put across. It needs a constant positive view of trans people being shown on the Television. Drip, drip, drip.
As for the Sport issue, in my opinion, Trans people arent doing themselves any good by entering cis-female sporting competions, with quite often a much stronger body and winning everything, because they are alienating themselves, not only alienating themselves but creating dislike for themselves, It is not good to do sports. There ought to be a Trans Sport section, this would promote publicity and would be benign, especially if there were some great positive characters in Trans Sport on the Television.
 
Last edited:
When you say that gender critical feminism is "a conservative movement that asserts that men are always stronger and inherently violent so the best women can hope for is to establish safe spaces and ferociously police the borders of womanhood to prevent any males from entering those spaces. "

I haven't read the post you're responding to so I don't know if you've correctly paraphrased what has been said but this ^^ is a wrong and misleading characterisation of what radical gender critical feminism says about men. It does not say that men are inherently violent.
 
Currently, in Ladies fashions, and especially with shoes and boots, Ladies are wearing boots and shoes that are almost fully masculine. Of course it is a trend that has happened with women wanting more money in the workplace and dressing like men to show they can do an equal job. The range of clothes goes almost the full gamut, from feminine through androgenous and into masculine. Conversely there has been a trend towards more androgenous fashions for men, but, men wont wear it because a lot of them are masculine anyway and the ones who would wear it are frightened of meeting with violence. I would go so far as to say it isnt Ladies whom are an opponent of trans-women but is in objective terms, Men. It is violence from men that is the opponent of Trans-women. Violence friom Men against Women is also still happening and was the reason for many protests this year. I have to say, in my opinion, violence, ego and delusion are three of the main enemies of individual liberty.
 
It needs more people who are trans, presenting programs on the Television, especially the BBC. For cis people it is quite a culture shock to see trans people. It will take quite a time for it to be seen as "normal".
Hell, seems like just the other day a bunch of parents got freaked out because a kids' telly presenter had a minor disability. :(
 
Back
Top Bottom