little_legs
Поехали!
Hadley Freeman
Hadley Freeman gets money from American evangelists?Hadley Freeman
To be fair the vast majority of trans hostile posts on these boards have come from men, inline with the polling posted up thread.Aye, I accept it's not helpful. Maybe I should have said that it feels like a lot of the posts on this site appear to be influenced by the appalling opinions of terf journalists. My apologies.
There was a very good thread on Twitter the other day from a trans woman reiterating that trans people have never 'demanded' the removal of the word 'woman' or 'mother' etc, but they have asked could medical language reflect that some people who aren't women might need smear tests etc and make sure they get the check ups and treatment they need, and she specifically said this is fine in fact best to be 'women and people with cervixes' etc so it includes everyone.I will just observe that the debate has become needlessly vitriolic. On the face of things there is very little to argue about - a plurality of people in UK polls support self-identification and use of toilet facilities aligned with that. But there just hasn't been a discussion about how society uses language around gender. Government should be having these discussions and should be arranging citizens' assemblies to find a way through, but instead it is shamefully exploiting the whole thing as a wedge issue. This has I feel led to people feeling that definitions have been foisted on them by unaccountable entities - and this is creating anger. This has been compounded by some very clumsy use of language (e.g. 'menstruators', 'womb-havers') - supposedly to be more precise about language for (amongst other things) medical reasons - but I see no reason for e.g. smear tests why you couldn't just say 'women and trans men'.
Is that sentence your evidence for your allegation that she is funded by American evangelical xtians?A while back the Guardian US published an open letter criticising Freeman.
Just out of interest, why do you think all these left wing radfem terfs are being exploited? Why haven't they noticed? Or could it just be that they disagree with you?A while back the Guardian US published an open letter criticising Freeman.
Edit: I'll find the letter when I get to my laptop. It's not a secret that evangelicals are exploiting the British terfs in the mainstream media.
No, polling doesn't tell you which side is right and which wrong. But in this case, I think it does undermine some key claims and arguments of the gencrit lobby.All I was doing was pointing out that the polling on this issue is not straightforward. Even if it was, either way, it still wouldn't say who was right, just what most, or a plurality, of people thought.
I guess they'd point to the fact that pre-op trans women have access to women's changing rooms despite the fact that (as the poll shows) most women don't want that.That we are being steamrollered into accepting trans rights by men who refuse to listen to the views of women.
Is that sentence your evidence for your allegation that she is funded by American evangelical xtians?
i mean, if thats all you've got i'll stop asking.
There is a real & interesting thing here, somewhere nearby, about how the worst people in the world (evangelicals, right wing extremists, the Republican Party, the Polish government, 'traditional family' promoters and all the many assorted dregs of that kind are absolutely loving this, as a wedge issue, and will leverage the hell out of it. And at the same time it is a real - and eternal - problem that some people will turn a blind eye to and even pal up with the absolute worst shitheads just because they think they are aligned on one thing.
That's what actually scares me, the leverage that is being wrung from this by properly dangerous people.
As an aside, not quite an illustration, check this out, Alex Jones just met Graham Lineham on a lesbian dating app.
Just out of interest, why do you think all these left wing radfem terfs are being exploited? Why haven't they noticed? Or could it just be that they disagree with you?
They'd be missing the point. This hasn't happened because it represents the views of men and those of women have been ignored. Across the board, men are less supportive of trans rights than women.I guess they'd point to the fact that pre-op trans women have access to women's changing rooms despite the fact that (as the poll shows) most women don't want that.
As an aside, not quite an illustration, check this out, Alex Jones just met Graham Lineham on a lesbian dating app.
The poll shows that nearly 30% of women polled don't know whether pre-op trans women should have access to women's changing rooms. I'd say you're on pretty dodgy ground talking about what 'most women' want based on a 900 person poll in which almost 1/3 say they don't know. I'd also say that framing your post in that way is slightly disingenuous.I guess they'd point to the fact that pre-op trans women have access to women's changing rooms despite the fact that (as the poll shows) most women don't want that.
What am I missing?
It’s definitely him as he’s boasted about it and posted those pics himself on his shitty blog. As to whether the clip itself is genuine and not just edited slyly, I dunno, but the fact that Jones has gone to the bother of videoing printed out photos from the internet instead of displaying them digitally and has also not bothered to format them so they end up spreading over two pages - well, it strongly suggests it’s either genuine fucking old man idiocy or an extremely well thought out troll/jokeDo we think this is actually Linehan? I'm not sure it passes the basic test of looking like him. What am I missing?
I wonder if they got the pics from Linehan's "research" and just didn't know/care that one of them was the daring investigative journalist himself.It’s definitely him as he’s boasted about it and posted those pics himself.
As to whether the clip itself is genuine and not just edited slyly, I dunno, but the fact that he’s printed out photos from the internet and not bothered to format them so they end up spreading over two pages strongly suggests it’s either genuine or an extremely well thought out troll/joke
I doubt Jones is even aware of Linehan and his shithouseryI wonder if they got the pics from Linehan's "research" and just didn't know/care that one of them was the daring investigative journalist himself.
That only holds true for those who don't consider trans women to be men.They'd be missing the point. This hasn't happened because it represents the views of men and those of women have been ignored.
No, but his researchers might have been, or might have been led to him when they googled "man on lesbian dating ap".I doubt Jones is even aware of Linehan and his shithousery
I doubt he or they care either wayNo, but his researchers might have been, or might have been led to him when they googled "man on lesbian dating ap".
The poll shows there's not majority support amongst women for pre-op trans women's access to female changing rooms (and a plurality that's actively against it). As to the sample size, 900 seems reasonable, and I note that the objection wasn't raised to counter earlier claims that it demonstrates women's trans inclusivity.The poll shows that nearly 30% of women polled don't know whether pre-op trans women should have access to women's changing rooms. I'd say you're on pretty dodgy ground talking about what 'most women' want based on a 900 person poll in which almost 1/3 say they don't know. I'd also say that framing your post in that way is slightly disingenuous.
As an aside to that aside, I briefly forgot the difference between Alex Jones and Alex James and was wondering what possible connection the Britpop cheese man could have to all this.As an aside, not quite an illustration, check this out, Alex Jones just met Graham Lineham on a lesbian dating app.
It needs more people who are trans, presenting programs on the Television, especially the BBC. For cis people it is quite a culture shock to see trans people. It will take quite a time for it to be seen as "normal". Celebrations such as pride are certainly working. Gay people are now almost totally accepted. Trans is much more difficult to put across. It needs a constant positive view of trans people being shown on the Television. Drip, drip, drip.So if trans people shouldn't stand for elected positions and shouldn't take part in sports etc what are they supposed to do then? It honestly seems to me that some people want them to be pushed out of anything 'visible' whatsoever
When you say that gender critical feminism is "a conservative movement that asserts that men are always stronger and inherently violent so the best women can hope for is to establish safe spaces and ferociously police the borders of womanhood to prevent any males from entering those spaces. "
Hell, seems like just the other day a bunch of parents got freaked out because a kids' telly presenter had a minor disability.It needs more people who are trans, presenting programs on the Television, especially the BBC. For cis people it is quite a culture shock to see trans people. It will take quite a time for it to be seen as "normal".
Which disability?Hell, seems like just the other day a bunch of parents got freaked out because a kids' telly presenter had a minor disability.