Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Thames Water about to collapse?

Fuckers have not been able to supply water to Guildford or Godalming since Saturday night and still not sign of when they will be able to. They claim it’s cos of too much rain recently, said that with a straight face.

Last financial year they had revenue of £2b and from that they made a profit of £1b. Either they charged twice as much as was needed or there was a potential £1b of much needed investment that wasn’t made.

Cunts.
Yep, the asset management cunts that own the monopoly extract the wealth and then shift it to other parts of their portfolios that extended stupid credit under the Macquarie years. See, they take no dividends.
 
We need emergency legislation to prevent a total water supply and financial meltdown if Thames Water fails
Richard Murphy. December 15 2023
As is now widely acknowledged, including by the company itself, Thames Water is now facing significant financial difficulties. That company has a £190 million debt to repay in April 2024 and is at present suggesting that it does not have the means to make settlement. This means that at a technical level the company might be insolvent and might need to enter into insolvency administration. The enormous quantity of debt that has been piled upon this company, coupled with the increase in interest charges over the last two years has placed it in a situation of financial unsustainability in its current format.

Insolvency is a dire situation for any company to find itself in. Thames is, however, in a very different situation from most companies for some very particular reasons.
 
Yes, you can't let the corporate shareholders down. Keep borrowing billions at excessive rates to pay out the dividends and sod the customer base. None of these corporate schills should ever be allowed to run any business ever again but they'll get on the corporate merry-go-round and swap over to another company and start it all again, after collecting their golden leaving and joining bonuses.
 
Yes, you can't let the corporate shareholders down. Keep borrowing billions at excessive rates to pay out the dividends and sod the customer base. None of these corporate schills should ever be allowed to run any business ever again but they'll get on the corporate merry-go-round and swap over to another company and start it all again, after collecting their golden leaving and joining bonuses.
Largely because they're doing exactly what they're remunerated to do.
 
How could England’s water system be fixed?
Wed 10 Jan 2024
A debt-ridden, leaking, polluting industry, owned largely by foreign investment firms, private equity and pension funds who have presided over decades of underinvestment most shockingly illustrated by the scale of raw sewage dumping into rivers: that is the privatised English water industry in 2024.

It is a global anomaly. Over the last three decades it has evolved into a notoriously complex system of shadow ownership that has loaded debt on to the balance sheet, while providing rich dividends for investors.

Today, water as an industry is in varying levels of crisis. In the south-east, Thames Water, the biggest company, is riddled with debts of £18bn and struggling to extract the millions it needs from shareholders while its value plummets. At South East Water, the cost of servicing its debt has risen in six months by £7.4m to £54.8m as inflation and higher interest rates bite.

Water companies across England are under criminal investigation into suspicions thousands of treatment works have been illegally dumping sewage into rivers for many years.

Total dividends paid since 1989 have reached £83.7bn at today’s prices. Meanwhile, customers are being asked, via bill increases of up to 40%, to pay for required new investment of £96bn.
Some ideas in the article, don't know enough about it to say if they are viable.

Richard Murphy, of the Corporate Accountability Network and Sheffield University, argues the water companies are in effect environmentally insolvent because they do not have the financial means to raise the £260bn needed to stop their sewage dumping, according to a House of Lords assessment. Therefore no compensation is due to shareholders, or to those who lent money to the companies.

But Murphy said in order to be pragmatic, a small offer to shareholders and a reasonable offer to secured creditors would be required to take the companies back into public control using the special administration rules.
 
Moral collapse of any pretense at regulation:

It makes complete sense; in the neoliberal economy of privatised natural monopolies, the regulator only exists to give the pretence of regulation whereas their role is really one of maintaining minimal risk to the asset management companies that rotate ownership of the dividend mines.
 
Shareholders are refusing to come up with the £500m that is due to be paid by Monday, Sky is reporting that if they don't find the funds elsewhere, which seems somewhat unlikely, the government will have to step in and nationalise them, potentially costing the tax-payers billions. :mad:

If I heard it right, they have paid out £7bn in dividends, and have debts of £8bn.

Thames Water said its shareholders will no longer provide £500mn of fresh equity by the end of the month, saying that conditions imposed by the industry regulator make the company’s business plan “uninvestible”.

The £500mn was the first part of a £750mn commitment made by shareholders last July, which was subject to the implementation of a new business plan.

In a statement on Thursday, Thames Water said it was still hoping to agree a business plan with regulator Ofwat that was “affordable for customers, deliverable and financeable for Thames Water, as well as investible for equity investors”. It added that it was planning “to pursue all options to secure the required equity investment from new or existing shareholders”. This is a developing story.

 
Back
Top Bottom