Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Thames Water about to collapse?

How many industries or even companies has this government actually nationalised?
I remember them nationalising this one a couple of years back
but then it is a key defence industry allowing it to go bust would have resulted in us having to build nuclear subs out of old bog rolls or even worse buying the steel off Johnny Foreigner.
Haven't they nationalised (at least temporarily a couple of train operators?)
 
Labour would do it first. What we have is unanimous agreement among the pols that nationalisation is over. They will take in failing operatrors, return them to health at the publics expense then give them back to the private sector. So its not about tory majorities or labour majorities. None of them have any intention of changing this.
Not so sure about that myself. I agree with you that large scale nationalisation Corbyn style is a non-starter these days, I'm not convinced that even a Starmer led Labour Govt forced to nationalise a utility would immediately resell it as soon as possible though. I think it's more likely that they would keep hold of things like water and rail. It's in their draft proposals at least to take the railways back as contracts expire. Things like energy suppliers which are doing fine (profit wise at least) aren't going to get nationalised though.
 
Not so sure about that myself. I agree with you that large scale nationalisation Corbyn style is a non-starter these days, I'm not convinced that even a Starmer led Labour Govt forced to nationalise a utility would immediately resell it as soon as possible though. I think it's more likely that they would keep hold of things like water and rail. It's in their draft proposals at least to take the railways back as contracts expire. Things like energy suppliers which are doing fine (profit wise at least) aren't going to get nationalised though.
You can trust everything shammer says to be changed
 
I used to visit Clearwater Court in Reading (Thames Water's head office) when I worked for another company in the group.

The amount of money spent on those offices was, er.... just a little excessive IMO :eek:

Anyway, I was going to say that they did employ some pretty clever people. However, the management was unbelievably complacent. Not to say incompetant too.
 
How many industries or even companies has this government actually nationalised?
I was thinking of railway companies. Don't get me wrong, I'm not applauding the actions of the government. More, laughing at their perfidious, utter hypocrisy.
 
One to watch might be South West Water, owned by Pennon Group who are proud as Punch about their sector-leading dividends at 10.9%. The head honcho was sufficiently embarrassed about dumping sewage in the sea to forgo her almost £500k bonus and word is that the water will run out during the summer, in Cornwall at least. There's a Devon MP calling for investigation of their affairs and a couple of enquiries ongoing about sewage dumps. Someone in Head Office is certainly crunching the numbers to calculate the point at which it is more advantageous to throw in the towel.
 
Listening to Feargal Sharkey on LBC was vary enlightening... Listen from here Link to interview

" Water companies have an operating license, in order to revoke that licence the government have to give the water companies 25 years notice...

Loaned companies 25 years worth of profits paid through to themselves as dividends in effect mortgaged the profit for the company for the next 25 years. Not only that but with accruing these huge debts they can then charge interest on the debt helping themselves again."

14 billion debt for Thames water. Various shell companies set up etc....Look at KEMBLE WATER FINANCE LIMITED. Carrying £21.7 billion pounds of debt. When Thames was privatised in 89 it was debt free.
Thames water is the tip of the iceberg"

we've been fleeced. Again. and people are crying out for us to bail out a company that has been asset stripped and leveraged to high heaven. The government are more broke than Thames water 😕
 
Last edited:
And, of course, it's debatable whether or not 'nationalisation' by a neoliberal, consolidator state is the answer. Asset manager society has developed precisely because the ideology of the main UK political parties has willed it, and they will clearly only re-nationalise as part of the de-risking 'contract' with the asset manager corporations. It's no coincidence that this whole sector of the economy remains beyond regulation and is 'overseen' by toothless bodies that have themselves been deliberately hollowed out.

I think Nine Bob Note neatly sums up above how the blue/red tories would see any 're-nationalisation'; take on the debt, hold for a short while then, having de-risked, sell on to another set of asset manager criminals. Same old, same old; privatise the gains and socialise the losses.
See also banks during 2009/10 bank incurred recession
 
I remember them nationalising this one a couple of years back
but then it is a key defence industry allowing it to go bust would have resulted in us having to build nuclear subs out of old bog rolls or even worse buying the steel off Johnny Foreigner.
Haven't they nationalised (at least temporarily a couple of train operators?)
and operated by gameboy controllers.
 
One to watch might be South West Water, owned by Pennon Group who are proud as Punch about their sector-leading dividends at 10.9%. The head honcho was sufficiently embarrassed about dumping sewage in the sea to forgo her almost £500k bonus and word is that the water will run out during the summer, in Cornwall at least. There's a Devon MP calling for investigation of their affairs and a couple of enquiries ongoing about sewage dumps. Someone in Head Office is certainly crunching the numbers to calculate the point at which it is more advantageous to throw in the towel.

We've been in an official state of drought for over a year now. And probably will be indefinitely.
 
I was listening to some Sir Whatever on Radio 4 get asked about the possibility of nationalisation yesterday (itself a rarity) and he just waved it off with the same waffle about efficiency that we've been hearing for 40 years. The interviewer didn't challenge his assertion at all, of course.

Private Is Best remains absolutely armour-plated dogma as far as the political class is concerned no matter how much shit goes wrong or how clearly the model is a money pit mess in natural monopoly sectors.
 
If it was nationalised would we somehow have to compensate people who own shares in a manifestly doomed enterprise? If so, why? You invest in a dud, you lose, that's how the market works, tough shit.
Given the circs, any non-neoliberal governing party would legislate to nationalise the thing for a nominal price and the former owners should think themselves very lucky that they can walk away from £40bn debt.
 
I was listening to some Sir Whatever on Radio 4 get asked about the possibility of nationalisation yesterday (itself a rarity) and he just waved it off with the same waffle about efficiency that we've been hearing for 40 years. The interviewer didn't challenge his assertion at all, of course.

Some cunt on BBC news last night explaining that the debt is just money gone to shareholders, but the government is hoping for a 'shareholder injection of money soon' - ffs, why do they repeat this utter drivel they are given by various govt. departments? Do we not have any actual journalists any more?
 
Back
Top Bottom