Treacle Toes
Time
If true, could this policy be described as burqas by the back door.
Shut up. Please.
If true, could this policy be described as burqas by the back door.
If true, could this policy be described as burqas by the back door.
If true, could this policy be described as burqas by the back door.
Here's a burqa by the back door...
London mayor plans negative body image advert ban on Tube, buses and trains - BBC News
"As part of his mayoral election manifesto Sadiq Khan pledged to ban adverts promoting "unhealthy or unrealistic" body images."
Seems a bit odd to me, I wonder if it is to pander to conservative Islamic communities. It's not a huge big deal but if this policy is a front for something else, then it is.
Why does it seem odd to you? Have you not been aware of criticism of adverts that engage in body shaming? The "beach ready" thing?
I was aware of that particular instance even though I hadn't seen the adverts (independently of the story), which I understand were primarily on the London underground. So if I was aware (someone who can count his visits to London on one hand), it was obviously a sizeable story.
As for the wider issue of the advertising industry promoting a certain body image, surely you were aware of these criticisms?
I could describe David Attenborough as a school of fish wearing a human suit.
you stupid berkIf true, could this policy be described as burqas by the back door.
The clues are there once you know what to look forThat BASTARD!!!
I trusted him, and he turns out to be sardines!
Here's a burqa by the back door...
London mayor plans negative body image advert ban on Tube, buses and trains - BBC News
"As part of his mayoral election manifesto Sadiq Khan pledged to ban adverts promoting "unhealthy or unrealistic" body images."
Seems a bit odd to me, I wonder if it is to pander to conservative Islamic communities. It's not a huge big deal but if this policy is a front for something else, then it is.
I dunno, is Greebozz 's concern about this issue a front for islamophobic bigotry? or a front for anger at not having naked women on display at all times? or a front for a worryingly poor sense of humour?
Not read much Pratchett then, Frank?... the real Greebo is always so pleasant, wise and reasonable ....
In the past Greebozz (who from the name I always assume is Greebo's evil and stupid alter ego, which might help to explain why the real Greebo is always so pleasant, wise and reasonable) has always been a purveyor of unironic, unreconstructed, does-what-it-says-on-the-tin complete bullshit. I fear this thead is no exception.
Not read much Pratchett then, Frank?
If true, could this policy be described as burqas by the back door.
that's MY lineGreebozz , however, has much to be modest about...
good point well madeThere's a huge difference between enforcing modesty and banning unrealistic body images
What the OP is effectively saying is that its not possible to be immodest if you have a realistic body image. Which is a lot more offensive that they're realising.
on the plus side we won't see your slobbering unnatural face gurning out at us from posters on the tubeLondon mayor plans negative body image advert ban on Tube, buses and trains - BBC News
"As part of his mayoral election manifesto Sadiq Khan pledged to ban adverts promoting "unhealthy or unrealistic" body images."
Seems a bit odd to me, I wonder if it is to pander to conservative Islamic communities. It's not a huge big deal but if this policy is a front for something else, then it is.
My mysogyinistic, uber-porn loving contacts on Facebook are fucking *FUMING* about this.
*FUMING*
let me give you a sampleWhat is uber-porn and where can i watch it?
let me give you a sample
first we take the underground1st stage of sharia law in London apparently
#facebook fact