Johnny Vodka I was trying to think of a way to explain to you why your posting style is so annoying on here. All I could come up with us this. Maybe if I get enough likes for it, I'll know that I'm saying something recognisably true and you'll have something to work with.
It's like we're all in the pub (this pub analogy keeps getting wheeled out because it does work well on here)... So we're all in the pub and we're sitting and talking about a football game. We're discussing the tactics, and the manager's choices about who was on the pitch, and whether or not the weather played a part, or the new pitch, or the fact that some of the fans had been arrested outside. We're listening to those who know a lot about the play and the background, and the witty ones have enough space to pipe up every so often, even if they're not adding anything to our understanding of the game. And then you come in, and you bang the door on your way in so we all look up, and someone groans a bit and several others say "Oh he's alright at least he's a trier" so when you come over from the bar with your pint, having not offered anyone else a pint, we squish up to make space, and you sit down. You're quiet for a moment or two, and then you suddenly pile in to the conversation and you seem to be saying that the game we were discussing isn't football at all, or at least not in your interpretation, because once, you spoke with someone in Delhi who explained to you the history of the game and how it's meant to be played. The conversation stops, and someone tries to point out that Delhi football is indeed a thing, but not what we're talking about, and we try to get back to the interesting and informative discussion we were having before, but you keep piping up to tell us that on the wrong track, and we really do need to get our head around the fact that were not really discussing what we think we are, and really we ought to redefine out terms along the lines that you suggest.
So some people will just shut up, or go to another table, or even leave the pub. And some people will listen to your stuff and try to understand it and why you think that your angle is better or more true than everyone else's. And some people will actually get into a debate with you about what you're saying and try to prove that even if what you say is not in itself inaccurate, it's irrelevant to the conversation we were having.
But before too long, that original conversation is completely lost, and now we're all talking about what you think, and what you say.
And then, at some point, someone will start to lose patience with all this, because the conversation we were having was interesting and fun, and this just isn't.
At some point, you'll "inadvertently" insult someone in your effort to make a strong point.
At some point, someone will say something potentially hurtful to you, but you'll seem not to mind, maybe because some attention is better than none.
Eventually, everyone who's still at the table will begin to talk about you as if you're not even there, trying to decide whether you're actually malicious and deliberate in the way that you seem to disrupt and overturn every single conversation that you get involved with.
The thing is though, unlike
Sasaferrato and
Utopia and
Quartz , you do seem to be at least somewhat interested in the debate rather than just imposing your viewpoint. Now, I can't work out if you really are interested in the debate, or if you've worked out that you can keep the thread going indefinitely by being
just flexible enough to make everyone else feel that it's not pointless to engage with you.