All these silicon valley pratts who have warbelled on about "disrupt" in their trendy converses, what happens when you "disrupt" your own company into oblivion, or at least to the out reaches of a far rigth hell scape?Didn't Zikak praise in ironic way teh sheer power of Coca-cola - how the product itself is untouchable, the brand just stands by itself. No real need to beg and simp, the wars been won with all rivals. He said it's the perfect capitalist archetype.
Musk and Twitter:
Can't say I'm wildly enthusiastic about Musk's plan to kill all birds, but at least it'll get rid of the seagulls, so that's something to say for it.
Elon Musk wants to relive his start-up days. He’s repeating the same mistakes.
What PayPal’s history teaches us about Elon Musk’s management of Twitterwww.disconnect.blog
Apparently he's wanted x.com for a while...
Oh is there a pathetic Edgelord own the libs angle? Pray tell?hmm world wide brand recognition
fuck that own the libs "x"
hmm just to clarify no brand association
There's something in this. That x is associated with a lot of filth. "What if my boss/kids glances, sees it and misinterprets?"Now I feel like I'm posting on a strip club's forum. He must have a bet on, like in trading places or something.
8.5 out of ten on the abuse scale. Excellent content.To be fair to him, If I blew 44 billion dollars on something i too would want to be able to set fire to it in the most public and stupidest way possible. Do like that he was saying the x should be monochrome & in the style of art deco, the giant helpless shithead.
Oh is there a pathetic Edgelord own the libs angle? Pray tell?
I’m no corporate branding expert, but this seems like a really shit idea.
Turns out you can make it to being the richest person in the world an still be fixated on a 20 year-old humiliation.I don't think there's an "owning the libs" angle to Musk's pursuit of the the X brand, I think it's more to do with him having a long-standing obsession with getting it off the ground ever since it lost out to PayPal. His thinking seems to be putting the cart before the horse, as if building an edgy late-90s style image is the key to success, rather than establishing a reputation first. The fact that he's doing this by ripping the skin off a already-established brand and crudely sewing on the skin of one his old failures betrays his lack of awareness that the rest of us can see what he's doing.