Boeing had two massive 'hiccups' with their Max 8 designs and still exist and airlines still buy their planes since. That's in a different league to the fuss about blue ticks and puts things in perspective.My 'hiccups' don't usually involve major global methods of communication...
Boeing had two massive 'hiccups' with their Max 8 designs and still exist and airlines still buy their planes since. That's in a different league to the fuss about blue ticks and puts things in perspective.
In the end, whatever you personal feelings about him (quite clear what they are!), 99% of Twitter users generally don't care about him particularly and won't abandoned Twitter for just that reason.
The need for Celebs egos to get retweets and followers won't end in blue tick fuss.
The need for Celebs egos to get retweets and followers won't end in blue tick fuss.
Elon Musk has threatened to reassign NPR's Twitter account to "another company."
In a series of emails sent to this reporter, Musk said he would transfer the network's main account on Twitter, under the @NPR handle, to another organization or person. The idea shocked even longtime observers of Musk's spur-of-the-moment and erratic leadership style.
Handing over established accounts to third parties poses a serious risk of impersonation and could imperil a company's reputation, said social media experts.
"If this is a sign of things to come on Twitter, we might soon see even more of a rapid retreat by media organizations and other brands that don't think it's worth the risk," said Emily Bell, a professor at Columbia Journalism School who studies social media. "It's really an extraordinary threat to make."
...His remark on Tuesday that he may transfer NPR's primary Twitter account with nearly 9 million followers to another entity is typical of how Musk has run the social media site.
As is often the case with Musk, it is not clear whether he will follow through on the threat.
One former Twitter executive was taken aback by the remark, telling NPR that such a threat should be alarming to any business operating on the site, since it indicates that acquiescing to Musk's every whim may be necessary in order to avoid being impersonated.
For most of its 17-year history, Twitter has had rules that maintained a certain level of order and offered both individuals and organization some control over their presence on the platform.
NPR CEO John Lansing has previously said he lost faith with "decision-making at Twitter," and that more time is needed in order to determine if Twitter can be trusted again.
A spokeswoman for NPR declined to comment further.
Musk, whose statements to reporters are regularly laced with jokes, insults or attempts at trolling, responded sarcastically when asked who would potentially take over NPR's Twitter account.
"National Pumpkin Radio," Musk wrote, adding a fire emoji and a laughing emoji to describe the content of the fictional gourd-themed broadcaster. "NPR isn't tagged as government-funded anymore, so what's the beef?"
In an email sent at 2:19 a.m. EDT after the story was originally published, Musk wrote a message without any text in the body but with this subject line: "You suck."
Odd, why would legitimate business want to associate its representation with this extreme horseshit
thats some sorry shit... ignore them and their ignorant theoriesI’ve had a South African try the same shit with me, link after link of crime rates for black people in SA with the inference being that they’re predisposed to violence
Are those numbers wrong ?Odd, why would legitimate business want to associate its representation with this extreme horseshit
thats some sorry shit... ignore them and their ignorant theories
What numbers are you on about?Are those numbers wrong ?
That particular 'perspective' omits the white-on-white number which is in excess of 2.2 million (page 13, table 14). It also ignores that "the largest percentage of violent incidents committed against white, black, and Hispanic victims were committed by someone of the same race or ethnicity".Isnt the most common violence white on white, or just mixed
What numbers are you on about?
Isnt the most common violence white on white, or just mixed
That particular 'perspective' omits the white-on-white number which is in excess of 2.2 million (page 13, table 14). It also ignores that "the largest percentage of violent incidents committed against white, black, and Hispanic victims were committed by someone of the same race or ethnicity".
That particular 'perspective' omits the white-on-white number which is in excess of 2.2 million (page 13, table 14). It also ignores that "the largest percentage of violent incidents committed against white, black, and Hispanic victims were committed by someone of the same race or ethnicity".
Ahhh, yes. I'd been wondering why they didn't include the infamous "black-on-black" stats that they always like to point to, but I guess that'd make it even more obvious they're not also showing white-on-white.Exactly, the chart lies by omission by not including intra-racial violence numbers. It's exactly the kind of shithouse propaganda spewed forth by white nationalists.