The Wedding Photographer is not horror, but is particularly grim, and dark as fuck. Though justice is served at the end.Haven't watched the new one yet but my 12yo has just discovered Inside No.9 and is working his way through on iPlayer. Last night he watched The Harrowing before bed, and ended up getting into bed with us at 1am because he was scared <3
I recognised him - 'It's Johnson!' - but couldn't remember his name. His name is 'Johnson' now and for always.I was sure I recognised Pantalone through the mask, but I failed to place it. I finally realised on reading the credits that it was Johnson from Peep Show.
I was coming here to say this was the very first episode of Inside No 9 I managed to guess the twist well before it happened.I called at least part of the twist, I'm quite proud to say.
He was barely in it, though.Sheersmith ruined it for me. Crude, boring and shit acting.
Proper performance-driven, well written stuff you devour every line of dialogue off. If they were making these as small production theatre plays as opposed to television, they would scoop every industry award going.Absolutely loved this week's one. I've enjoyed the last 2 but this one ticked all my boxes for Inside No9.
The first one, although not my favourite, had that quality of "where else do you see anything like this?" It reminded me of Zanzibar in that respect.
The second one was classic darkness but this week - such a great claustrophobic set up with mutiple payoffs. I love this show.
Yes, I thought the strength of this eoisode was in the performances rather than the story.I thought this week's was a bit flat. The stuff with Adrian Dunbar was all very "Extras" and the twist was not that great.
Excellent perfomances from Mrs Doyle and the daughter though.
I thought this week's was a bit flat. The stuff with Adrian Dunbar was all very "Extras" and the twist was not that great.
Excellent perfomances from Mrs Doyle and the daughter though.
Totally agree with your last bit. In fact, they could easily just have written him out of the story altogether. But I don't agree with the first bit. I thought Pemberton was believable as the obsessive jilted man, while the lipreader was a bit Mike Leigh caricature, which then made perfect sense with the twist - she was playing a Mike Leigh caricature.Less keen on the hotel story. I didn’t buy either of the principal characters. Sheersmith’s interruptions didn’t help either. His character belonged to a different story.
They were idiots.In the podcast they made the point that the German hotelier was necessary as comic relief, they felt it would have been too serious without him.
Pemberton and Sheersmith?They were idiots.
I reckon the crossover between 9 viewers and those who saw One Man Two Guvnors is significant enough for them to get away with it.I’ve just caught up with the series so far. The first one was bloody cheeky. Detailed and lovingly written “second year drama degree” content, which - as a drama graduate I appreciated, but... it’s niche.
Obviously there were a bunch of pop culture references too, but even still, the commedia stuff was pivotal. Including the punchline.
I reckon the crossover between 9 viewers and those who saw One Man Two Guvnors is significant enough for them to get away with it.
Fraid so. Sheersmith just took a shit centre stage for me. It just wasn’t funny, it was just lazy. The phone call part, that was funny, even if there were no reason for her to make that call. But sheersmith just took me out of the moment and made me notice various plot holes which just undermined the whole story.Pemberton and Sheersmith?