Jessiedog said:
Woof
but you would deny the right of workers here to organise against cheap labour?? makes no sense mate
Jessiedog said:
Woof
durruti02 said:er what does this mean then ???
Jessiedog " If you think that denying Philippine workers their right to work overseas to earn a crust to feed their families will end imperialism, you are more misguided than I thought. It won't. It will end in a meltdown of the Philippines that would take decades, or even longer, for the country to recover from. Hundreds of thousands would starve.
Frankly I don't think that would be good for Philippine workers rights and I will fight you tooth and nail to prevent such an atrocity.
So, better get out of the way - there's multiple-dozen, double-decker bus loads of nurses, cleaners, gardeners and drivers heading your way."
and again
" The entire economy of the Philippines depends upon remittances from the more than 10% of the population (predominately married mothers,) that work overseas. We are talking some 10 million peeps here - 30% plus of the adult female population. If these remittances were to cease, the country would collapse overnight and mass starvation would ensue."
that is quite clear VP
Y'know, durruti?durruti02 said:but you would deny the right of workers here to organise against cheap labour?? makes no sense mate
becky p said:I cant really work out where jessie dog is coming from on here. The Phillipines apparently gets 10% of its GDP from remittances sent from workers who have emigrated.But it loses nearly all its skilled workers. Are you seriously trying to say that people in phillipines benefit from this?
By my calculations, total overseas-worker remittances to the Philippines probably account for closer to 20% of GDP and prolly 30%+ of GNP.becky p said:I cant really work out where jessie dog is coming from on here. The Phillipines apparently gets 10% of its GDP from remittances sent from workers who have emigrated.But it loses nearly all its skilled workers. Are you seriously trying to say that people in phillipines benefit from this?
Jessiedog said:- the vast, VAST, VAST majority of Philippine overseas workers are actually working as domestic servants - though overqualified by a mile for that work are most of them)?
It's an "export industry", people study nursing/physio for the sole purpose of emigration (and the govt. subsidises the training in order to garner the foreign exchange remittances).
There are many doctors in the Philippines who have given up doctoring and are entering full time nursing school - it's much easier to get overseas thru' nursing.
I know two young women aged 15/16 who have just completed the equivalent of their "O' levels in the Philippines. They were educated at probably the best (local) private school in Manila - courtesy of their mother who works fucking hard as an overseas domestic helper to finance not just this, but the whole extended families (and assorted friends and hangers on - Oh! And they employ a domestic helper, too) wellbeing.
They both got A+ results in about ten subjects, are gifted in art, music and other extra-curricular activities. You'd think they'd be off to the top colleges in the country to study anything they wanted - they could. But they're not. They're trying to get into nursing school. It's a no-brainer for them, their families, their community and their society.
I think this is very sad, but understandable. *
The Philippines is currently churning out @ 50,000 freshly trained nurses a year (although last year, 2006, some 4,000 of those were found to have somehow "aquired" the examination results in advance of the finals - Oops! Peeps can be very creative where long-term and substantial financial benefits are involved). A very substantial minority (at the least) of these nurses never make it overseas and of those that do, most invariably return after a decade or so. The net result is an increase in trained nurses in the Philippines.
All in all, the opportunity that Philippine workers have to work overseas is the best thing that ever happened to the Philippines.
Jessiedog said:In practical terms, your "anti-immigration" stance boils down to being nothing but "anti-worker", pure and simple.
Just as long as you and your mates can earn an extra two-quid-fifty an hour, you don't give a fourpenny fuck if tens of millions of "foreigners" are plunged into deprivation and hunger as a result. And many of these "foreigners" are already trying to scrape by on less than US$2:00 per day, you stupid twat.
becky p said:Your calculations seem to be based on wishful thinking Jessie. One can only guess why you would wish to defend a situation that means the phillipines exports more people than any other nations except India and China?
Remittances from the 7 million workers working overseas in no way compensate the people of the phillipines for what they lose.
There maybe a few people doing well out of mass migration in the phillipines but they are very much in a minority. Other people see their families and way of life broken up.
The more i have seen of your arguements the less convincing they are.
Ummmmmmm.becky p said:Your claim that there is now an increase in trained nurses in the phillipines is interesting Jessie. So why is there now a shortage of nurses in phillipines hospitals?
Have you read the thread?Immigration is only ever going to be any kind of solution for a minority of people. I can't quite understand your enthusiasm for it?
Huh?becky p said:You seem to delight in misrepresenting what durriti has been saying. it really does your arguement no favours. Do you really think durruti is trying to defend low wages in the phillipines and other developing countries?
I mean is that really what you think?
Don't be fucking stupid!durruti02 said:the processes which benefit the phillipines thru remitances cause far more harm than the good they create , as bb says