ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
...and why are you so fascinated by circle jerks?
For the same reason CR is.
...and why are you so fascinated by circle jerks?
Continual Rejection?For the same reason CR is.
Over the course of 35,000 posts here and on the other shit site, CR has proved that he has an unfortunate habit of ganging up with the far right time and time again, inevitable given his infantile anti-imperialist pose, so in this instance, it's fair to say there's a significant overlap between himself and the scumfronters. He's a little bit vichy."Stormfront language".
Nope. That's flimsy. Very flimsy. There are still many parts of the UK where "that lot" is used to denote everyone and anyone from supporters of a rival football team to members of a rival religious or political sect. Yes, it's a deliberately "othering" term, but your instant assumption that use denotes racist language is daft. If you'd claimed it solely about his calling them all rapists, I would agree, but "that lot" is colloquial English.
Cajfash said:the brits should be thanking their lucky stars to this day we never rowed in firmly behind the germans , whod have let us write a blank cheque . Financial reparations etc from Britian . Had that have happened Britian would have been finished for good . [...] Our self interest and sovereignty is what must come first , not some musty old empire that destroyed and annihilated this country
Where did you find that ? Is it some sort of official government sponsored leaflet to be handed to everyone at the border??Germany seem to have this all in hand. They've released a leaflet about respecting women and gays and not hitting kids
Guide: Germany and its people | BR.de
Yes, looks like it - the article explains that the video clip concerned has been used to fuel ant-Muslim / immigrant hatred based on no facts at all.is Scopes right?
Where did you find that ? Is it some sort of official government sponsored leaflet to be handed to everyone at the border??
There's other versions, like this here 'refugee guide' Chapter 0 – Introduction which includes advice like 'Smiling in public is fine and quite acceptable, it is not considered to be flirting, even if you are talking to a stranger' but also warns that, in Germany, 'Punctuality is very important.'.
Dunno. It's pretty out there in parts. Don't think this advice would go down very well on U75 for instance :Its like a PC pamphlet for telling immigrants how to be PC but too PC to explain PC
'one can remember...'It is interesting how the response from the euro left to the attacks like in Heesch is so weak, one can remember the attacks in Cotbuss in post re-unification Germany, they sent ripples across the world.
Hardly surprising. He sees himself as "Everyman".
Cheers for posting. Just read it. Why the need for you to bring sarcasm with it? (Hate filled bastard)
The difference here is he is talking, in terms I wouldn't dispute, about multiculturalism as state enforced and the problems and contradictions that brings. I don't have a problem with his argument.
Except the average person on the street, fuck it, me anyway, doesn't necessarily use the word multiculturalism in this way. He talks of 'diversity' in a kind of opposition to multiculturalism. To me it's semantics. And using the word 'multiculturalism' as a negative gives succour to pretend lefties like CR to deal in their casual racism.
An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an attack on an argument made by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, rather than attacking the argument directly. When used inappropriately, it is a logical fallacy in which a claim or argument is dismissed on the basis of some irrelevant fact or supposition about the author or the person being criticized.
Too much of this going on!!!
The "average person on the street" , you're smart enough not to
say what you are thinking I will give you that. However it is quite obvious that this is just sneering classism.
He uses the language of the people in the pub, the people on the estates, the streets, shops, places of work. He is not some effete hand wringer.
The image for personal freedom isn't very helpful:
He looks like something off the Scarfolk blog. "Watch out there's a humanoid simulacrum about"That is not a bad pint he has pulled to be fair.
What is supposed to be going on in that picture? I can not work it out. Never wear speedos around reading nuns?
yeh. but now he's going to drink it.That is not a bad pint he has pulled to be fair.
That is not a bad pint he has pulled to be fair.
Analyse his arguments. Saying that he thinks he's everyman isn't ad hominem, it's an accurate presentation of how he represents his views as normative "common-sense" views. Most people hedge their views by making clear that it's their opinion only. He doesn't. He deploys the politician's trick of placing himself as the centre of rational and reasoned commentary on the subject he's discoursing on.