Organs can be replaced. Maybe someone will donate one #hereallweekInterior surprisingly OK, though I believe organ is fucked.
Salma Hayek’s husband apparently.
Some billionaire has already donated 100 million euros (£86m) towards the restoration.
A spate of thefts and vandalism in French churches has led to calls for the government to act.
Recent incidents have included a fire in Saint-Sulpice church in Paris, human excrement smeared on the wall in Notre-Dame-des-Enfants church in Nîmes, southern France, and vandalism of the organ at Saint-Denis basilica outside Paris, where all but three of France’s kings are buried.
This is always a pretty sterile comparison to make. “Why not spend the money on a better cause?” Firstly, everyone would have to agree on what the better causes are. Then you’ve got a problem with extent. If a billionaire should spend his money on poor people rather than rebuilding Notre Dame then surely you and I should give our money to homeless people rather than spend it on beer or holidays, and if everyone prioritised human suffering, animal charities would receive no donations.I don't know why but my immediate reaction to this is not sympathy. Notre Dame is a beautiful building no doubt. But it is still a church. At one time it was almost pulled down by the people of Paris.
That a billionaire can cough up 100 million to restore it makes me feel even less sympathy. Thats 100 million that could have been spent improving life in the banlieues, but it wasn't accessible for that. Why not make them as beautiful, or at least liveble. Or working on the multitude of problems that France faces.
Am I missing something here; has the Church of Rome said that it won't pay for the re-build?This is always a pretty sterile comparison to make. “Why not spend the money on a better cause?” Firstly, everyone would have to agree on what the better causes are. Then you’ve got a problem with extent. If a billionaire should spend his money on poor people rather than rebuilding Notre Dame then surely you and I should give our money to homeless people rather than spend it on beer or holidays, and if everyone prioritised human suffering, animal charities would receive no donations.
Do you think they did it for the insurance?
Because what's burning is above the vaulted stone roof.How is it possible that the interior looks that lightly damaged? Doesn't fit with this pic, something doesn't add up for me
How is it possible that the interior looks that lightly damaged? Doesn't fit with this pic, something doesn't add up for me
This is always a pretty sterile comparison to make. “Why not spend the money on a better cause?” Firstly, everyone would have to agree on what the better causes are. Then you’ve got a problem with extent. If a billionaire should spend his money on poor people rather than rebuilding Notre Dame then surely you and I should give our money to homeless people rather than spend it on beer or holidays, and if everyone prioritised human suffering, animal charities would receive no donations.
Nah, not an Act of God; merely a consequence of "his" permissive will.And does the insurance cover acts of God?
How is it possible that the interior looks that lightly damaged? Doesn't fit with this pic, something doesn't add up for me
That’s neither here nor there. If they said they you’d just have people saying that money should go elsewhere. It’s about the relative merits of the causes rather than where the money comes from.Am I missing something here; has the Church of Rome said that it won't pay for the re-build?
Well that’s one to take up with the various religions.Isn't charity the teaching of Christ? I don't think Jesus wanted any churches at all.
Isn't charity the teaching of Christ? I don't think Jesus wanted any churches at all.
Probably both 'here' & 'there' if there's any question of public money being spent on repairing a building owned by a private, religious corporation well itself able to pay.That’s neither here nor there. If they said they you’d just have people saying that money should go elsewhere. It’s about the relative merits of the causes rather than where the money comes from.
Probably both 'here' & 'there' if there's any question of public money being spent on repairing a building owned by a private, religious corporation well itself able to pay.
How is it possible that the interior looks that lightly damaged? Doesn't fit with this pic, something doesn't add up for me
This is what happens when men sodomise boys and girls
How is it possible that the interior looks that lightly damaged? Doesn't fit with this pic, something doesn't add up for me
Because what's burning is above the vaulted stone roof.
Indeed it does, but for many years the state has declined to finance repair, hence the 'Friends of ND' attempting to raise the £ from public/donors. Raises question of why the Church of Rome would not want to use a relatively small sum from its vast wealth to finance the upkeep of a building exclusively used to promote its particular supernatural belief system.It's owned by the French state.
This is what happens when priests sodomise choirboys
sounds great.standard three hour lunch break
French culture definitely has the right idea about a lot of things, and that’s one of them.a standard three hour lunch break.