butchersapron
Bring back hanging
The blood alcohol, coroner talking about that now and will from part of this one.
and this (note - link to a doc) coroners order that seems to severely restrict reporting of last weeks pre-inquest.
The order made on 31 March 2014, pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Contempt of Court Act
1981, is hereby varied as follows. Reporting is permitted of proceedings on 31 March 2014
to the extent only that it may be reported that (a) a jury is being empanelled to serve in these
inquests; (b) the jury is to be sworn on 1 April 2014; and (c) potential jurors have been
provided with a non-exhaustive list of potential witnesses with a view to considering whether
any of them knows a potential witness.
Diff ruling mate. Come back in this later but this was about last weeks pre-inquest meeting.
Going to be a year of this:
This is the talk about what will be covered.
This isn't some truth and reconciliation bollocks is it?
This isn't some truth and reconciliation bollocks is it? These fuckers need to go down, for a long time.
I was having these arguments in the 1990s when it really was an outsider campaign and the official line was very widely accepted. There is absolutely no way that events like today's would have been held back then across the country to commemorate the victims and widely acknowledge that justice was not served at the time. There are still nobheads out there who believe the sort of stuff you quote - but they're a lot rarer than they were. We've come a very long way (over far too long a time however).The Mail has an article about the silence observed at the matches today. The comments beneath it are fucking depressing...time to move on, only ever the victim etc....ffs.
The so-called Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), named to give the pretence of independence when it does not have any, has now announced its board. And those of truly independent mind have homed in on the presence of one William Newman, former managing editor and then ombudsman of the Murdoch Sun.
...
“It is the Sun’s duty as a newspaper to publish information, however hurtful and unpalatable it may be at the time”, he told. “On reflection, we accept the way in which the article was displayed could have given cause for offence. For that we apologise. For the substance we do not ... We cannot possibly apologise for facts and to do so would be an abdication of our responsibility to a wider public”.
A slight tangent, but any help on this most appreciated.
Does anyone know if John Beggs QC - the silk (“indisputably the lead QC to go to if you're a police force in a tight spot”) representing Duckenfield & co for the PSA and who said the Hillsborough Inquiry wasn't independent because it dealt with survivors' and support groups which have “an agenda” - was ever actually charged in connection with his previous life as an animal rights activist & spokesman for ALF, HRS, ARM etc?
The 1989 Henshaw book says no.
Also, anyone know what he did between 1993 & 1998?
(PS Yes, I have seen the April/May 2012 Private Eye articles but they don't address the questions above.)
Hope that helps
A former South Yorkshire police officer who was on duty at the Hillsborough disaster in 1989 has said a reference he made in his statement to a "smell of alcohol" in the pens where 96 Liverpoolsupporters died was wrong in hindsight and could have been "the smell of death".
Alan Ramsden, who served in the force from 1974 until 2002, told the new inquest into the disaster that other officers had not encouraged him to make reference to alcohol. "It was just an assumption by me at the time," he said.
After the disaster, Ramsden's statement was changed, which he said was done without his approval, and of which he remained unaware until this year. The first change was to remove his recollection that before the 1987 FA Cup semi-final at Hillsborough, police officers formed a cordon outside the Leppings Lane end to control the flow of supporters by ensuring they had tickets and did not carry anything offensive, including weapons. Two years later, police did not operate a similar "sterile area".
The second section removed from his statement referred to the location of the police control box at Hillsborough, "overlooking the area where the tragedy took place". Ramsden had written in his original account: "Were not the officers appreciative of the developing situation? What was the feedback from the officers working the perimeter of the pitch? Couldn't they see the developing crush on the terraces?"
He agreed with Simblet that his observation about the position of the control box was significant and remains important today. Mark George QC, representing 21 bereaved families, asked Ramsden: "You have got a control box overlooking the very end of the ground where this disaster happened, and you couldn't understand how on earth this had happened under the eyes of the officers in charge?"
"That's correct," Ramsden replied. He said he had felt "let down" by senior officers.
This thread's excellent for separating the wheat from the chaff. I often hear about stuff on this thread that I wouldn't stumble across otherwise. Many thanks to everyone who's contributed.Hard to balance posting everything with what is 100% relevant/key/important.