butchersapron
Bring back hanging
On the basis of 'they'll implode'? They didn't implode any of the other times that it was sure that they would. But go on, i'd like to see what's lead you to this conclusion then
They will implode though, whatever happens. Apart from older events - the Walkers quitting, Lee Barnes' hilarious attempts to present himself as legally qualified, and OMG Collett's arrest was the icing on the cake. They're a farce. I was much more worried about them a year ago. Now I'm finding it hard to take them seriously. Am I being naive?
Despite all these problems and more they're still here, it's interesting how it affects them getting activists out and it'll be interesting to see what happens after the election when they've got nothing but each other to get their teeth into (asuming they don't take a seat or even a significant number of council seats). It won't be the end of them. What could be the end is the financial irregularites that apprently exist but that might all be sour grapes from former members.
They haven't exactly made huge strides towards westminster though have they? There was a big fear that they would - and it hasn't materialised. In fact, the more exposure they've got, the more they've made themselves the object of ridicule. While the organisation of the party remains this inept, I'd expect that pattern to repeat itself.On the basis of 'they'll implode'? They didn't implode any of the other times that it was sure that they would. But go on, i'd like to see what's lead you to this conclusion then
In terms of the long term threat, I agree that they're worth maintaining an eye on. But the current set up is less than united, politically or personally. Even if they do completely implode (and the financial irregularities may be the catalyst as you say), then no doubt a clone of the BNP will rise to take their place. There will always be a RW extremist element to be countered, and the support gained by the BNP, EDL, UKIP and the swing towards the tories may be symptomatic of a disconcerting shift to the right overall. At this present moment though, the BNP themselves are what is termed in medicine as a 'self-limiting condition'. The more exposure they get, the more their inadequacies are exposed. I just don't see any clear and present danger.Despite all these problems and more they're still here, it's interesting how it affects them getting activists out and it'll be interesting to see what happens after the election when they've got nothing but each other to get their teeth into (asuming they don't take a seat or even a significant number of council seats). It won't be the end of them. What could be the end is the financial irregularites that apprently exist but that might all be sour grapes from former members.
They haven't exactly made huge strides towards westminster though have they? There was a big fear that they would - and it hasn't materialised. In fact, the more exposure they've got, the more they've made themselves the object of ridicule. While the organisation of the party remains this inept, I'd expect that pattern to repeat itself.
In terms of the long term threat, I agree that they're worth maintaining an eye on. But the current set up is less than united, politically or personally. Even if they do completely implode (and the financial irregularities may be the catalyst as you say), then no doubt a clone of the BNP will rise to take their place. There will always be a RW extremist element to be countered, and the support gained by the BNP, EDL, UKIP and the swing towards the tories may be symptomatic of a disconcerting shift to the right overall. At this present moment though, the BNP themselves are what is termed in medicine as a 'self-limiting condition'. The more exposure they get, the more their inadequacies are exposed. I just don't see any clear and present danger.
I really don't mean to preach complacency though. But I'd rather without the over-dramatisation either. The RW appears to get the majority of its publicity from LW reaction. I'm not 'no-platform' to any extent - that time has passed if it was ever there - but there's still a danger that LW 'backlash' can create interest where previously was only apathy.
what the fuck?
No seriously, i have no idea what you think you said.
It's drivel.
...out here in the boonies...
Yawn.Pithy? I didn't go to public school.
Or school at all, it seems.It doesn't. It's distance from real life is genuine.
This is just GE vote?
The British National Party has expelled a UKIP mole standing for the BNP in Thurrock after discovering that his aunt was the UKIP candidate and that he had been sent into the party to discredit it, Thurrock organiser Emma Colgate has announced.
“Mark Onions appeared out of the blue a short while ago and became very active,” Ms Colgate said.
“We never dreamed for a minute that his aunt was the UKIP candidate standing against us, and he gained our confidence enough to volunteer to be our candidate in the local ward against his aunt.
“When we discovered the link, our suspicions were alerted that something was amiss.
“Further research showed that he had posed for prank pictures in pubs and had written things on the Internet which could be used against the BNP, and Mr Onions was formally expelled from the party on Tuesday 13 April,” she continued.
“Unfortunately we discovered the deception too late to get his name off the ballot paper, but the public should be aware that Mr Onions is not a member of the BNP and has no official backing,” Ms Colgate concluded.
BNP webchat goes brilliantly:
http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/e...rson-bnp-1.694755?referrerPath=news/elections
pls link to something about a 300 person brawl at the nat. conf. or stfuTheir national conference attracted about 300 people, who ended up in a drunken brawl.
pls link to something about a 300 person brawl at the nat. conf. or stfu
Carshalton & Wallington — Charlotte Lewis;