belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
lol.Maybe they were scared of being attacked by this tool and her stupid acolytes?
lol.Maybe they were scared of being attacked by this tool and her stupid acolytes?
I dont. I use it as evidence that they dont give a shit. 3% is pretty tiny, 300 students. If they cant manage that, then it is clearly a massive fuss over nothing.The percentage of students that would need to vote for a recall is set at such a level that its to all intents and purposes impossible to remove her by that method, when you consider how totally disengaged most students are.
I dont think you can point to the lack of interest by most of the student body as evidence that she enjoys their support, or that her behaviour is somehow ok.
Is the best you have? Why bother bellend?lol.
because you're a misogynist prick, not worth engaging with.Is the best you have? Why bother bellend?
because you're a misogynist prick, not worth engaging with.
Odd that after all these years, you decide now that the popularity of a position is what gives it authority.I dont. I use it as evidence that they dont give a shit. 3% is pretty tiny, 300 students. If they cant manage that, then it is clearly a massive fuss over nothing.
10/15 years of reading his postsAre you going to explain how you leaped to that bizarre conclusion?
eh? Where have I dont that? I have repeatedly says that all it shows is that the bast majority of students dont give a shitOdd that after all these years, you decide now that the popularity of a position is what gives it authority.
that appears to be their view, yesAnd therefore its a 'fuss over nothing'
that appears to be their view, yes
I think it's an absurd fuss over nothing, built up by idiots and bigots
where did you get 3% from btw? I read it was a third of the student body earlier in the year.I dont. I use it as evidence that they dont give a shit. 3% is pretty tiny, 300 students. If they cant manage that, then it is clearly a massive fuss over nothing.
"a motion of no confidence fell short of the 3% of union members required to trigger a poll."where did you get 3% from btw? I read it was a third of the student body earlier in the year.
yeh. maybe you did. but it was wrong.where did you get 3% from btw? I read it was a third of the student body earlier in the year.
lol. I would have no problem with a man tweeting #killallwhitemen, no. And I don't believe there is one person who would be genuinely threatened by it. Nor by the original offense of asking white men not to go to an event intended for minority ethnic womenSo a male Tweeting stuff like that in the official capacity of a diversity officer would also be acceptable? I believe in diversity and equality. i think that is where you and me differ somewhat.
wouldn't call it an offence myself.lol. I would have no problem with a man tweeting #killallwhitemen, no. And I don't believe there is one person who would be genuinely threatened by it. Nor by the original offense of asking white men not to go to an event intended for minority ethnic women
lol. I would have no problem with a man tweeting #killallwhitemen, no. And I don't believe there is one person who would be genuinely threatened by it. Nor by the original offense of asking white men not to go to an event intended for minority ethnic women
probably go down a treat in some quartersHow about a male diversity officer tweeting #killallwhitewomen
It might be better face to face, we might like each other.because you're a misogynist prick, not worth engaging with.
How about a male diversity officer tweeting #killallwhitewomen
Come on, whatever you think of her that's clearly not the same is it? The context is totally different.
I am sure this was all done up the thread. I have never intention of doing it all again. Except to say if you can't see any difference then that's your problem.How about a male diversity officer tweeting #killallwhitewomen
Stranger things have happened!It might be better face to face, we might like each other.
How about a male diversity officer tweeting #killallwhitewomen