Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Goldsmiths University Diversity officer facing sack

Should she be sacked?

  • Yes she should

    Votes: 71 53.4%
  • No she should not

    Votes: 32 24.1%
  • Official warning

    Votes: 7 5.3%
  • Attention seeking option

    Votes: 23 17.3%

  • Total voters
    133
It's worth pointing out that the Screenwriter for Suffragette was also responsible for the Iron Lady. Emmeline Pankhurst is a perfect feminist for the ruling class today - she was anti-Communist, an imperialist and classist so there is little that needs to be done to make her acceptable for conservative sensibilities today. It is not really surprising that we are seeing a film centred around her rather than, for example, Emma Goldman or Rosa Luxemburg.

Or her daughter Sylvia.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
 
Nothing new is it? Limited focus on the more palatable parts of history (even when it is about unpalatable women's suffrage :facepalm:), and the more palatable views/position of those being celebrated...Damn right there was a choice by the film makers. Equally Sisters Uncut made the right choice to protest this IMO.
Having previous experience of sisters uncut, they are just a bunch of middle class self publicity seeking group with no interest in anything other than self promotion. They are divisive and intersectionalist .I would recommend anyone with true intentions to stay well clear of this group.
 
Having previous experience of sisters uncut, they are just a bunch of middle class self publicity seeking group with no interest in anything other than self promotion. They are divisive and intersectionalist .I would recommend anyone with true intentions to stay well clear of this group.
that's quite a divisive comment
 
Having previous experience of sisters uncut, they are just a bunch of middle class self publicity seeking group with no interest in anything other than self promotion. They are divisive and intersectionalist .I would recommend anyone with true intentions to stay well clear of this group.
true intentions of what?
 
Sorry mate...wasn't questioning you horribly...was hoping you might know the answers as you seemed to have a lot more knowledge of it than me.

part of the problem is that it hasn't been looked at. there was literally nothing until this year when a biog of singh was published. and as much as it looks like we have the role of women in that era is covered, it's still new enough as a field for their to be massive gaps. I spent a while looking for answers to these questions a couple of years ago and even when this went as far as discussing with postcolonial feminist historians, they didn't know either.

the more we find out, the better.

but what i do know about many of the women involved in feminism in that era, there's a lot of distinctly unpleasant ideas. fawcett was classist and pro imperialist. bessant believed in some very odd racialist philosophy, stopes in eugenics. as a movement, we want heroes, but our heroes had their bad side and we want heroes who were perfect. criticizing those heroes becomes attacking the movement, because we're used to being under seige from people who do so. in the end, i think that the odd and nasty beliefs of some of the movement's founders are less of a discredit to feminism than refusing to address those beliefs.

idk if we will find deliberate exclusion or hiding black women, but whatever we find, we need to address. and address the points that sisters uncut are raising how minority women get fucked over and how they are not protected from abuse. and the willingness to accept that multiculturalism means accepting screwing over women (recommend reading Sarah Song - Justice, gender, and the politics of multiculturalism for a look at this, should be compulsory reading for anyone asking why minority women complain feminism fails them)

and for whoever thought up those tshirts - you fucking idiot.
 
Big enough to smell a rat! sisters uncut have nothing to do with feminism

why do you get to define who is and isn't feminist?

from sisters uncut

We are a feminist group taking direct action for domestic violence services

Austerity is killing women. Join us in the fight #deadwomencantvote

what qualifications do you have that makes you better able to define who is and isn't feminist than the women defining themselves as feminist?
 
Im guessing the original slogan was trying to create a link between feminist campaigns and the anti slavery campaigns. which makes more sence in it's context than it's does now. but to use it now is a long way past being considerate or thoughtful an well into being a fucking ignorant twat
The use of the quote is nonsense tbh as is the offense at it. It is clearly meant in the colloquial rhetorical sense of making a stand. Any other questions about what the film makers went with should stand apart from that.
 
That's a big claim. How are you deciding who and who doesn't have something/anything to do with feminism? :hmm:
I hope you are nothing to do with them. If not do some research and find out for yourself. Middle class bored spoilt brats, the absolute opposite of any self respecting working class feminist.
 
Feminism is only a working class woman's issue? :hmm:

Also, can you outline what Feminism is? That way I might be able to understand why you are making such big, blanket statements about what women struggle for and against.
Investigate them for yourself and then it is your choice to decide.
 
Back
Top Bottom