scifisam
feck! arse! girls! drink!
newbie said:The sound on the Other stage for Arcade Fire was dreadful, as were the screens and the camerawork.
I thought the sound was great, mixing all the instruments really well, and the camerawork was jumpy but far better than Bjorks!
The camerawork was absolutely dire in her set; it showed her a lot in close-up, which is good, it showed the keyboard player an awful lot, mostly from one static angle, which got really boring, it showed the mixing desk a Hell of a lot, and it's not interesting enough to fill as much time as it was given, and a couple of times it showed the set from so far away that you could barely tell it was a stage, let alone what was on it. One of the reasons I was looking forward to Bjork so much was that her sets are usually stunning, and I still am not sure what was actually on there. Bjork herself was wonderful, and the song choices greatly pleased me, but the cameraman should be shot.
I am still glad I saw her set, although the walk back afterwards was one of the worst; at one point a car pulled up into a gate as I was walking through it, and stopped, so that we were all squished in for more than ten minutes.
There was hardly anyone there for Bjork, too. How weird is that? Who wouldn't want to see Bjork?