Crispy said:I know exactly what you mean. I got exactly one random conversation all weekend, everone else just stomp stomp stomp on by. And so much stuff left behind! I know sometimes it's difficult to get everything out, but I saw entire campsites abandonded - tents, sleeping bags, gazebos, stereo systems, the lot. I think it's been changing steadily over the last 7 years, but this one really brought it home.
I agree about the tat being left. The mud provides some -- but only a small -- excuse, but tat abandoning was pretty bad in 2005 too, and it was dry at the end of the festival, with the tat being left everywhere irrespective of how badly affected they were by the flash flooding of earlier.
BUT I disagree that the lack of random conversations and lack of friendliness. I think these factors may very well have been worse on the Oxfam Festival Safely frontline, or (in Crispy's case) the lack of friendliness may have benn more obvious on some parts of the site than others. (You were up with the Wicket Ground campers weren't you?)
Up in the Greenfields I had no problems finding a friendly conversation at any time, often they started it, often I did, and all was fine. Admittedly I know one or two GF people, but complete strangers were with very few exceptions pretty nice also. All over the site in fact, I scarcely witnessed, let alone get caught up in, any twattery.
There are LOADS of lovely people at Glastonbury!!
I think one criticism wiskey made earlier, about passive consumerism and lack of sponteneity, is a valid point in general. Glastonbury has definitely changed in that way over the years. But I think it's a BIT harsh to single out this year for special criticism of it, given the conditions!