Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Gender idealism?

Silas Loom said:
Anybody who seriously thinks this is a bot really doesn’t understand humans, or bots. If it’s just a convenient insult for abusing a newbie who seems unlikely to be an ornament to the boards, carry on.
Click to expand...
It's not a "convenient insult" and I have no desire to insult anybody, whether human or not. I admit, I haven't read the whole thread but from the posts I did read, it just seems to scream AI. I also admit I'm no expert on AI generated content so I don't know that for sure. I do know quite a bit about people (some of them are my friends), and for me, these posts don't pass the smell test. Yes, I am aware that I may be wrong about this and that the newbie might be a real person. If that turns out to be the case, then I apologise in advance.

On a side note, while I am a materialist, particularly in respect to Marx and Engels' materialist conception of history, I've always been sceptical of dialectical materialism. It always struck me as a bit too priestcraft-like. But that's just, like, my opinion, man.
 
Silas Loom said:
You don’t think that a Bosnian pan-Slavic Leninist might legitimately be keen on outmoded political trends?
Click to expand...
For one thing, the reference to Eurocommunism came out of nowhere. The post being replied to contained not a hint of a reference to Eurocommunism. Secondly, the poster says that they are opposed to Eurocommunism, which of course they would be, given that they purport to be Stalinist, and Eurocommunism was ostensibly opposed to Stalinism. Why mention something to which they are opposed, and to which no-one made a reference?
 
hitmouse said:
Is a random unprovoked mention of Eurocommunism more or less likely for a human being than a 36-page thread about whether adults eat flavoured crisps?
Click to expand...

It depends on the context and environment where these topics come up. A 36-page thread about flavored crisps, especially in a casual setting like an online forum or social media, is fairly plausible because people love talking about food, and these kinds of light-hearted debates can spiral into long, humorous discussions.

On the other hand, a random unprovoked mention of Eurocommunism is probably less likely to arise in everyday conversation, unless you're in an academic or politically engaged group. Eurocommunism, a specific leftist ideology from the mid-20th century, requires some knowledge of political history, making it a more niche topic compared to flavored crisps, which appeal to almost anyone with an appetite!

In short: the crisps thread is much more likely in most casual human contexts, unless you're hanging around political theory enthusiasts.
 
Silas Loom said:
It depends on the context and environment where these topics come up. A 36-page thread about flavored crisps, especially in a casual setting like an online forum or social media, is fairly plausible because people love talking about food, and these kinds of light-hearted debates can spiral into long, humorous discussions.

On the other hand, a random unprovoked mention of Eurocommunism is probably less likely to arise in everyday conversation, unless you're in an academic or politically engaged group. Eurocommunism, a specific leftist ideology from the mid-20th century, requires some knowledge of political history, making it a more niche topic compared to flavored crisps, which appeal to almost anyone with an appetite!

In short: the crisps thread is much more likely in most casual human contexts, unless you're hanging around political theory enthusiasts.
Click to expand...
1728898921435.jpeg
 
PTK said:
For one thing, the reference to Eurocommunism came out of nowhere. The post being replied to contained not a hint of a reference to Eurocommunism. Secondly, the poster says that they are opposed to Eurocommunism, which of course they would be, given that they purport to be Stalinist, and Eurocommunism was ostensibly opposed to Stalinism. Why mention something to which they are opposed, and to which no-one made a reference?
Click to expand...

Whatever they purport to be, they are consistently not keen on Stalin.

Yugoslav said:
Simple. My username indicates that I am a pan-Slavic commie. Something Stalin is not good at.
Click to expand...
 
PTK said:
For one thing, the reference to Eurocommunism came out of nowhere. The post being replied to contained not a hint of a reference to Eurocommunism. Secondly, the poster says that they are opposed to Eurocommunism, which of course they would be, given that they purport to be Stalinist, and Eurocommunism was ostensibly opposed to Stalinism. Why mention something to which they are opposed, and to which no-one made a reference?
Click to expand...
Think you're on shaky ground here, I feel like arbitrarily attributing political positions to your opponents and then arguing against that is a long-standing leftist tradition.
 
I suspected it could be someone with mental health issues tbh. :(
Silas Loom said:
It depends on the context and environment where these topics come up. A 36-page thread about flavored crisps, especially in a casual setting like an online forum or social media, is fairly plausible because people love talking about food, and these kinds of light-hearted debates can spiral into long, humorous discussions.

On the other hand, a random unprovoked mention of Eurocommunism is probably less likely to arise in everyday conversation, unless you're in an academic or politically engaged group. Eurocommunism, a specific leftist ideology from the mid-20th century, requires some knowledge of political history, making it a more niche topic compared to flavored crisps, which appeal to almost anyone with an appetite!

In short: the crisps thread is much more likely in most casual human contexts, unless you're hanging around political theory enthusiasts.
Click to expand...
Is this ChatGPT? :D I guessed it was because of the American spelling.
 
existentialist said:
Yeah, intellect. Are you one of those fruitcakes that thinks we can intellectualise our way out of every challenge we face?
Click to expand...
giveing off strong beard stroking 'intellectual' communist deep in purity and philosphical discussion while people are actually suffering and pragmatic social democrats and Socialists are making material change and providing actual support and solidarity
 
Epona said:
Ugh ffs, what is it with cis people who think it's OK to sit around discussing trans people without realising that there are trans people in the room for whom it is actually a lived experience and not a theoretical debate?

I doubt anyone would think it was OK for a group of men to sit around and decide what to do about women's rights, would they?
Click to expand...
this is the point that has been made to the thread's OP numerous times

as for the latter this is what MAGAts and Evangenitals do all the time
 
Yugoslav said:
Previously I had such debates with trans people. Needless to say, they weren't much different compared to what the non-trans idealists are doing here. This is a very serious problem apparently over a simple solution that would truly be a revolutionary progress for all the trans people suffering.
Click to expand...
1. you are spouting beard stroking bollocks
2. you have consistantly Othered trans people
3. you speak over trans people
4. you speak over those who point out you are speaking over trans people, and finally,
5. you are spouting beard stroking bollocks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

danny la rouge
Scottish velar fricative change by age, gender and class in Glasgow - hypothesis
2
Replies
59
Views
1K
maomao
maomao
friendofdorothy
Feminism and the Gender Pay Gap
3 4 5 6 7
Replies
183
Views
12K
Monkeygrinder's Organ
M
weltweit
Is there an ideal population level for a country?
2 3
Replies
65
Views
4K
fela fan
F
Back
Top Bottom