DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
The bbc cannot be trusted with political reportage full stop- refusing to air the gaza appeal, robinsons lies against strikers, the 45 minutes iraq bullshit. They are nakedly pravda.
They might well start to but it takes more than 90 minutes (even with extra time and penalties) to invade a country with ground troops. The stated aim to "take over Gaza" will take months.I've been wondering for the past couple of days whether they were going to send the ground troops in while the rest of the world is watching the football.
Sadly not so. Pravda means "truth".The bbc cannot be trusted with political reportage full stop- refusing to air the gaza appeal, robinsons lies against strikers, the 45 minutes iraq bullshit. They are nakedly pravda.
Sadly not so. Pravda means truth.
I assume everone knows that.its also the name of the soviet unions state paper, renowned for its untruths and misdirections.
I assume everone knows that.
They might well start to but it takes more than 90 minutes (even with extra time and penalties) to invade a country with ground troops. The stated aim to "take over Gaza" will take months.
There may be some special force people on the ground to help direct the bombing but surely regular troops would be at risk from that very bombing.I wasn't suggesting they would be in and out before the final whistle! I read earlier today they'd already sent some in for a bit anyway.
There may be some special force people on the ground to help direct the bombing but surely regular troops would be at risk from that very bombing.
The very same words were also uttered by James Purnell the Director of Strategy and Digital at the BBC. He is also a member of Labour Friends of Israel which means that he can not deliver an unbiased news strategy. The BBC is a nightmare in its coverage of Israeli policy and actions.
I wasn't suggesting they would be in and out before the final whistle! I read earlier today they'd already sent some in for a bit anyway.
@OccPalGaza
People on Khan Younis beach breaking their fast targeted in Israeli air strike. Injuries reported. 8.15pm
When the fuck is the west going to stop pandering to these religious lunatics in israel. it's clear they view everyone else as second class citizens.
prada? the emperor's new clothes and that?The bbc cannot be trusted with political reportage full stop- refusing to air the gaza appeal, robinsons lies against strikers, the 45 minutes iraq bullshit. They are nakedly pravda.
Dont patronise me you daft little nonsense spongeIt's not a difficult thing to understand. Two factions in a power struggle with two different strategies neither faction with any record of tolerating dissent try to set up their own little dictatorships.
'get knotted' doesn't have the same ring to it as 'get carter'It's not a difficult thing to understand. Two factions in a power struggle with two different strategies neither faction with any record of tolerating dissent try to set up their own little dictatorships.
A Norwegian doctor in the besieged Gaza Strip has strongly criticized Israel for using cancer-inducing bombs against Palestinian civilians.
Dr. Erik Fosse told Press TV that the majority of patients hospitalized in Gaza are civilians injured in attacks on their homes and about thirty percent of them are children.
Dense Inert Metal Explosive, known as DIME, is an explosive device developed to minimize collateral damage in warfare.
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/07/13/371162/israel-drops-cancerinducing-bombs-on-gaza/
Oh fuck with this. Palestinians haven't been driven mad. How patronising is that?
Hamas are trying to pressure Israel into releasing the latest batch of prisoners Israel took in the West Bank over the last few weeks. It's a modest and quite sane goal. Their methods are terrorist even if their options are limited.
Also there is no "slow genocide". There's plenty of real shit going, without resorting to such contortions.
Dont patronise me you daft little nonsense sponge
What created the situation for them to have such power?
No doubt you are of the belief that the world sprung into being when you seeped from a place near your mams rignpiece, but, guess what?
It didn't
There was something before your pathetic snivlllings on here
Fuck off and learn how not to be so simplistic
http://angryarab.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/syrian-revolutionaries-are-not-angels.htmlSyrian "revolutionaries" are not angels
Whenever I criticize the Syrian "revolutionaries" (and they are to revolution what I am to Zionism), I am often met by comments along the lines: the revolutionaries are not angels. Today, I remembered those statements. During the Lebanese civil war, when I was a radical leftist boy, I was always criticizing the thuggery of the Fath Movement and its gangs in Lebanon. I kept saying that those crimes will bring so much damage to the Palestinian revolution. I was always told: the "revolutionaries" are not angels, and one Fath fanatic once wanted to arrange my assassination because I dared to "criticize the revolution". (Comrade `Imad saved me, thanks you wherever you are now). Later, when the Israeli invasion happened, it of course relied on the climate of hostility to the revolution that was created by the thuggery of Fath and its affiliated groups. I used to run into some of those who used to tell me "the revolutionaries are not angels" after the invasion and I would look at them with such anger, not really feeling vindicated given the high price we paid. I think about that in the case of Syria. Finally, it is not a revolution when it is all thuggery, as is the case with the Ikhwan and Salafite thugs in Syria. Good night.
Ithink when you have a state thats sunk to the level of actually counting the calorific value of food imports it will permit into gaza ...
It's hardly patronising to theorise that if you expose a population to particular external stimuli, that they'll develop neuroses and pschoses related to those stimuli, you doughnut!
ViolentPanda said:"Slow genocide" boils down to a matter of perspective, of how we choose to look at the facts of oppression and their results. To choose to see operations such as this as exercises which have a convenient by-product of a reduced (both through death and emigration), further-cowed population is rational, rather than a "contortion". We need to ask ourselves "does the state of Israel need to kill on this scale to achieve lawful aims?". The inevitable answer is "no, it does not, but it uses those methods because they dispose of potential problems in the shape of oppressed individuals and communities".
the thing is the uk govt condemned it when it was the germans doing this sort of thing but seem to find the zionists' more technical ways of organising and bombarding a ghetto more to their liking.Just as some other fascists did in ghettoes in "Greater Germany". I agree with whoever on the thread said they don't like comparisons to the Nazis, but the Nazis did exactly this, at least until they stopped permitting any "imports" into the ghettoes at all.
'get knotted' doesn't have the same ring to it as 'get carter'
you seem to have missed the palestinian deaths caused by zionist action widely reported over the past few daysDoes Israel have the power to decrease the population if it wanted to?
you seem to have missed the palestinian deaths caused by zionist action widely reported over the past few days
If the rockets were in any way effective Gaza would be a smoking ruin completely by now. Given how much of a bloodthirsty zealot the Israeli government already is, an actual real attack would be the beginning of armageddon.
as per definition of genocide posted above it is not simply about killing peopleWell if you want to move the conversation to an abstruce argument about genocide rather than the human consequences of Israel's actions, then we need to stop thinking emotionally and start thinking about numbers. Is this kill rate likely to be maintained indefinitely? How does it compare to the natural birth and death rate?
as per definition of genocide posted above it is not simply about killing people