Bahnhof Strasse
Met up with Hannah Courtoy a week next Tuesday
"Even Labour MPs"?
Whether they're red, blue or yellow, they're all neoliberals. Same shit, different arseholes.
Tories & Labour, two cheeks of the same arse
"Even Labour MPs"?
Whether they're red, blue or yellow, they're all neoliberals. Same shit, different arseholes.
"Even Labour MPs"?
Whether they're red, blue or yellow, they're all neoliberals. Same shit, different arseholes.
So you're a Thatcherite?neoliberalism is the best system we have currently
At least Labour MP's campaign for social democracy and strong public services. Labour are the lesser of two evils and I would vote for them to be in government.
I think neoliberalism is the best system we have currently, although it's not without its flaws. The challenge is to make it work better so its of benefit to everyone - rich or poor.
What is neoliberalism - and what are the other real options 'currently' on the table that it is better than?At least Labour MP's campaign for social democracy and strong public services. Labour are the lesser of two evils and I would vote for them to be in government.
I think neoliberalism is the best system we have currently, although it's not without its flaws. The challenge is to make it work better so its of benefit to everyone - rich or poor.
So you're a Thatcherite?
Neoliberalism is a system that has spiraled out of control due to all the things that it planned to do and that it necessarily entails. Nonetheless the way to remedy this in the future is though neoliberalism and all that it entails.No, that's like calling anyone who votes for Labour today a Thatcherite.
Neoliberalism is a system which has spiralled out of control due to poor regulation of the banks, loss of industry, loss of social housing, loss of the state and huge inequality. After years of growth, the inevitable boom and bust had to happen and that was in 2008. The poorest in society have paid for it since with austerity.
However, I am not anti-capitalist and think it's the system that works best today. There's no going back to Socialism and there needs to be more of a social element to capitalism, which focuses less on the need for big business and rich individuals.
The five factors that you've listed as causing neoliberalism to spiral out of control are pretty much defining qualities of neoliberalism.Neoliberalism is a system which has spiralled out of control due to poor regulation of the banks, loss of industry, loss of social housing, loss of the state and huge inequality.
That's why I'd like to see a more responsible form of capitalism which keeps big business and banks in order, reverses the trend of growing inequality and doesn't look to shrink the state all off to the private sector. It is possible and it's the kind of policies Labour campaign for. The 11 years of Blair showed it was possible.The five factors that you've listed as causing neoliberalism to spiral out of control are pretty much defining qualities of neoliberalism.
The rest of your post isn't really coherent enough to comment on.
It's because you don't know what neoliberalism is.That's why I'd like to see a greater a more responsible form of capitalism which keeps big business and banks in order, reverses the trend of growing inequality and doesn't look to shrink the state all off the the private sector. It is possible and it's the kind of policies Labour campaign for. The 11 years of Blair showed it was possible.
As for my post not being coherent, maybe because you don't agree with it?
No, that's like calling anyone who votes for Labour today a Thatcherite.
Neoliberalism is a system which has spiralled out of control due to poor regulation of the banks, loss of industry, loss of social housing, loss of the state and huge inequality. After years of growth, the inevitable boom and bust had to happen and that was in 2008. The poorest in society have paid for it since with austerity.
Tony Blair thought the same. Shame Giddens was proven to be a guru with feet of clay, whose "third way" was shot full of assumption and wishful thinking.However, I am not anti-capitalist and think it's the system that works best today. There's no going back to Socialism and there needs to be more of a social element to capitalism, which focuses less on the need for big business and rich individuals.
No, it's because you don't understand what neoliberalism is.As for my post not being coherent, maybe because you don't agree with it?
Yes, I do. It's effectively all about shrinking the state, slashing government spending and enhancing the role of the private sector.No, it's because you don't understand what neoliberalism is.
That's why I'd like to see a more responsible form of capitalism which keeps big business and banks in order, reverses the trend of growing inequality and doesn't look to shrink the state all off to the private sector. It is possible and it's the kind of policies Labour campaign for. The 11 years of Blair showed it was possible.
The five factors that you've listed as causing neoliberalism to spiral out of control are pretty much defining qualities of neoliberalism.
The rest of your post isn't really coherent enough to comment on.
Thus deliberately resulting in "poor regulation of the banks, loss of industry, loss of social housing, loss of the state and huge inequality". Explain how this was both the aim of and what caused neoliberalism to spiral out of control.Yes, I do. It's effectively all about shrinking the state, slashing government spending and enhancing the role of the private sector.
Enhancing is an interesting word to use here isn't it?Yes, I do. It's effectively all about shrinking the state, slashing government spending and enhancing the role of the private sector.
I agree with you that Labour has moved away from its socialist roots and has moved from the left-wing party it was a few decades back to occupy a space in the centre ground.Given the current basis of Labour's political thinking, then "Thatcherite" is close to the mark. The Labour Party's core ideology is closer to "one nation" Toryism circa the 1970s/'80s, than it is to anything vaguely resembling socialism. It accepts neoliberalism as the start-point of any policy on the economy.
Yes, I do. It's effectively all about shrinking the state, slashing government spending and enhancing the role of the private sector.
What - brutal state-led top-down neoliberalism with social characteristics. Sounds like just what you want.I see myself as left-wing but I'm left feeling like a Tory on here.Is the system in China really the kind of society we'd like to live in compared to our own system?
What is the system in China?I see myself as left-wing but I'm left feeling like a Tory on here.Is the system in China really the kind of society we'd like to live in compared to our own system?
What - brutal state-led top-down neoliberalism with social characteristics. Sounds like just what you want.
There are 'elements' of democracy in China and it's not a communist state. And it's been pushing private enterprise for 30 years now.it's just a one-party communist state which does nothing to promote enterprise and rules the lives' of its people.
What?I think neoliberalism is the best system we have currently, although it's not without its flaws.
Neloiberalism thrives off this chaos.Neoliberalism is a system which has spiralled out of control due to poor regulation of the banks, loss of industry, loss of social housing, loss of the state and huge inequality.
There never was 'socialism' despite what has been spouted over the decades about it.... 'Social' capitalism? Good luck with that...There's no going back to Socialism and there needs to be more of a social element to capitalism, which focuses less on the need for big business and rich individuals.
Not going to happen.That's why I'd like to see a more responsible form of capitalism which keeps big business and banks in order, reverses the trend of growing inequality and doesn't look to shrink the state all off to the private sector.
[wipes drink off monitor]It is possible and it's the kind of policies Labour campaign for. The 11 years of Blair showed it was possible.
So why go on about how it's the best system we have? Unless you think the above is a good thing?Yes, I do. It's effectively all about shrinking the state, slashing government spending and enhancing the role of the private sector.
The Chinese state does nothing to promote 'enterprise'? (And is enterprise a word like 'enhancement' - a given unchallangeble good?) Are you sure of this?At least there's an element of democracy where we all get a chance to vote for a range of different parties.
In China, it's just a one-party communist state which does nothing to promote enterprise and rules the lives' of its people.
How far right are you? You sound like a crazy ideologue shouting that they are the centre ground that all things musty revolve around. A confused one mind.I'm out of this thread.
How far left are people on here?