Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Feminism - where are the threads?

so what's the actual proposal to abolish sex work within wage labour? criminalising it obviously doesn't work. And I think prostitution is a grotesque aborration, but surely that necessitates organising against the pimps?
I dont have the answers. That's why I am interested in having a thread with intelligent women (and some men I suppose) to chew these ideas over.

The Nordic model criminalises men, the buyers of sexual services, rather than what happens mostly in the world wherein the provider, the woman (girl) is criminalised for providing those services. The reasoning is said to be that men use prostitutes because they can. If they are in fear of recrimination they may stop and thus supply and demand is diminished. The model also allows, in theory, for women to gain skills to remove them from the game
 
so what's the actual proposal to abolish sex work within wage labour? criminalising it obviously doesn't work. And I think prostitution is a grotesque aborration, but surely that necessitates organising against the pimps?
It necessitates decriminalising it. Like they did in Australia. Now the industry is a much safer place there.
 
But there is whoring yourself and WHORING yourself

You working for the man is not the same as you taking the man's cock inside you

I mean I didn't say it was, I was just saying that, any proposals to abolish sex work under our current system will drive it underground or even legitimise it under histrionic moralist outrages. In Turkey for instance, prostitution is unspeakably taboo. We wouldn't be able to have this conversation outside without at best receiving suspicious looks and being told to leave the store, at worst getting a slap on the hand (or if known to be a political oppositionist, be arrested on trumped up charges.)

This doesn't mean there isn't a huge industry dedicated to this that everyone knows about.
 
I dont have the answers. That's why I am interested in having a thread with intelligent women (and some men I suppose) to chew these ideas over.

The Nordic model criminalises men, the buyers of sexual services, rather than what happens mostly in the world wherein the provider, the woman (girl) is criminalised for providing those services. The reasoning is said to be that men use prostitutes because they can. If they are in fear of recrimination they may stop and thus supply and demand is diminished. The model also allows, in theory, for women to gain skills to remove them from the game

There are very easy ways for men (any competent criminal really) to avoid being caught under such a model.
 
I mean I didn't say it was, I was just saying that, any proposals to abolish sex work under our current system will drive it underground or even legitimise it under histrionic moralist outrages. In Turkey for instance, prostitution is unspeakably taboo. We wouldn't be able to have this conversation outside without at best receiving suspicious looks and being told to leave the store, at worst getting a slap on the hand (or if known to be a political oppositionist, be arrested on trumped up charges.)

This doesn't mean there isn't a huge industry dedicated to this that everyone knows about.
Thanks for the clarification.

And in part, I agree. Women will put themselves at risk because of economic necessity and who are we especially as feminists to criticise?
 
There are very easy ways for men (any competent criminal really) to avoid being caught under such a model.
All I am hearing is women put up with it. Men are going fuck so men are going to fuck.

Perhaps some women would like to comment, or is this thread on feminism becoming all about the menz? I do hope not.

For now I bid you guys goodnight
 
All I am hearing is women put up with it. Men are going fuck so men are going to fuck.

Perhaps some women would like to comment, or is this thread on feminism becoming all about the menz? I do hope not.

For now I bid you guys goodnight

I'm not saying that? I'm saying without an in depth analysis of protection rackets people can't just be like Nordic model might be an option. It might be, but this requires probing.
 
All I am hearing is women put up with it. Men are going fuck so men are going to fuck.

Perhaps some women would like to comment, or is this thread on feminism becoming all about the menz? I do hope not.

For now I bid you guys goodnight
I thought feminism was about equality? I don't see anyone stopping women from posting, but it seems a couple are trying to stop men from posting.
Women will put themselves at risk because of economic necessity and who are we especially as feminists to criticise?
Men put themselves at risk, too. Not because they want to, but out of economic necessity. Do you think it's only women who are affected by austerity and capitalism?
 
I thought feminism was about equality? I don't see anyone stopping women from posting, but it seems a couple are trying to stop men from posting.

Men put themselves at risk, too. Not because they want to, but out of economic necessity. Do you think it's only women who are affected by austerity and capitalism?
Yes, but this thread is particularly for women about women's issues. Sorry if it hurts your feelz

(Gromit I added a z!)
 
was gonna say people still subtly imply my username is stupid (which it is) but naming yourself after judith butler, one of the most establishment academic intellectuals is definitely something a returner would do on urban.
 
Oh, I beg your pardon....

In work, not in daily life?

I’m not sure. Slaving away in women’s work may be physically safer than the equivalent in men’s work, to be sure.
There's no 'could be'. It is.
I'm not saying 'shut up and deal with it' I'm saying don't talk like men aren't in the same boat.
 
Back
Top Bottom