Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Establishment networking, sleaze and corruption. A handy compendium.

It would have been worse under that monster.

TERRORIST SYMPATHISER


Anyway, I do wonder whether anything tangible will really come of it in the end, but without the Good Law project would there even be the level of scrutiny they are driving?
Has to be in the courts to have any hope of an effect. Even if per the post up thread it "just" drives behaviour change (which, of course, will just mean they'll be more careful when being corrupt)
 
TERRORIST SYMPATHISER


Anyway, I do wonder whether anything tangible will really come of it in the end, but without the Good Law project would there even be the level of scrutiny they are driving?
Has to be in the courts to have any hope of an effect. Even if per the post up thread it "just" drives behaviour change (which, of course, will just mean they'll be more careful when being corrupt)
Corbyns lies about the NHS being up for sale ruined this country :mad:
 
Had a little dig and it looks like Jo Johnson's association with this Dyson technical training institute goes back to 2017 when he was a minister for education - there's loads of publicity about it over the last few years. So it's not really a smoking gun for some kind of quid pro quo corrupt arrangement, just background noise for a generally corrupt (but somehow accepted) revolving door between government and industry. I guess that's why it's only got random twitterers and The Canary excited.
 
Property developers responsible for flats covered in dangerous cladding have donated £2.5 million to the Conservative Party since the Grenfell Tower fire in 2017, analysis has found.

Boris Johnson has personally received £50,000 from individuals with links to the cladding debacle.

 
185902979_2542669232708305_7469500845763500813_n.jpg
 
Wrt to Torygraph article above here is a c&p of an email from GLP which may have more detail:

"It never stops.

Good Law Project has uncovered remarkable evidence that a Tory Minister brought a former Chair of the Tory Party, a man who now runs a lobbying firm, into the heart of Government to work on the massive multi-billion PPE procurement process. Having got his feet under the table that former Chair lobbied to win PPE contracts for at least one, and possibly a number, of clients of his lobbying firm.

The Tory Minister is Lord Bethell. The former Tory Party Chair is Lord Feldman - once described as David Cameron’s oldest and best friend - and he worked for Bethell from 23 March to 15 May 2020. And his huge lobbying firm is Tulchan, whose client list includes Bunzl Healthcare.

Bunzl was given a £22.6m PPE contract by the Department for Health without any competition in April 2020, smack bang in the middle of the period Feldman was working with Bethell. And we have also learned, from Government’s own documents, that:

  • Feldman was involved in the award of this contract. Bunzl had been removed from the Department for Health’s ‘approved suppliers list’ - and Feldman got them back on. An email from Feldman to Bunzl on 22 March 2020 states that he was acting as “an unpaid advisor to Matthew Hancock at the department of health...but that there have been some historic issues which mean that you have been removed from the approved suppliers list. I would like to remedy that as soon as possible”.
  • On the same day, he emailed Bunzl, copying in Andrew Wood whom he describes as “the person leading the accelerated procurement process in Cabinet Office” and said “I have spoken to him [Andy Wood] about Bunzl and the opportunity for you to supply the UK Government with equipment. He will be in touch”.
  • And then, several days later, when Bunzl thought the deal was not progressing quickly enough, it asked Feldman to intervene - which he did. On 25 March Feldman wrote directly to the line manager of the official dealing with Bunzl, encouraging him to expedite the contract award process: “We need to move quickly”.
We fear these revelations just scratch the surface. We have seen Lord Feldman’s ‘Declarations of interest form’ and it contains a list of his other conflicts of interest. But Government has concealed these other names:

“some of our clients [Tulchan Communication LLP], as well as many other companies are offering assistance to the government during the covid-19 crisis. This includes [REDACTED], Bunzl, [REDACTED], [REDACTED], [REDACTED]”.

Despite requests from our lawyers Government is refusing to confirm which other companies linked to Cameron’s oldest friend and his lobbying firm Tulchan Communications were introduced to Government and/or won public contracts.

We have now launched formal Judicial Review proceedings. If you would like to help us challenge this extraordinary abuse of power - you can do so here.

We are publishing the Judicial Review Bundle we’ve submitted to the Court. Our amended Statement of Facts and Grounds and my Witness Statement are well worth a read.

Thank you,

Jo Maugham QC
Director of Good Law Project"
 
It's a bit of an exaggeration to describe Tulchan as 'huge' in the industry, they're a relatively smaller player, dealing with mostly FTSE 350s. And they're certainly not 'his'. He's the current (co) boss but only came on board a couple of years ago. The firm is very much Andrew Grant's baby. Regardless, this isn't a good look for a PR agency.
 
Maybe there is another thread that would be better for this one but I cant resist putting it here.

Creative invoicing.


Greensill's business model - called supply chain finance - worked by placing itself between customers and suppliers. It would immediately pay the invoices that suppliers gave to their customers, meaning those suppliers would not have to wait possibly for months for payment.

The Financial Times has claimed that one of Mr Gupta's companies had sent Greensill invoices for business it had supposedly done with four European metal companies. But those European companies told the newspaper they had not dealt with GFG.

However, GFG said the invoices were for products it expected to perhaps sell in the future and that the financial arrangement was common for many of Greensill's clients.
 
Back
Top Bottom